Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Sizes consensus

Sizes consensus

I know this is a pretty subjective, touchy and even pointless issue with some. But for the sake of personal knowledge and curiosity, I wanted to bring it up. (As I speak I’m currently clamping, haha. How cool am I!)

In what ranges would you consider to be accurate for the following descriptions:

Small:
Below average:
Average:
Above average:
Big/large:
Wow:

What I’ll mainly seek from this research is what is officially considered small, and what is considered big and wow big.

Here’s mine, to use as an example. (I’m not too certain on my answers. Especially around the bigs area.)

Length (NBPEL. No point in using BPEL really, being the uncommon measure.)
Small: 3.0 - 4.7”
Below average: 4.7 - 5.4”
Average: 5.4 - 6.1”
Above average: 6.1 - 6.8”
Big/large: 6.8 - 8.0”
Wow: 8”+

Girth
Small: 3.0 - 4.4”
Below average: 4.4 - 4.7”
Average: 4.7 - 5.0”
Above average: 5.0 - 5.4”
Big/large: 5.4 - 6.0”
Wow: 6.0”+


Starting size: (April 1 2007) 5.95" BPEL x 4.65" EG. | Progress Thread (plus pics)

Now: (August 20 2007) 6.6" BPEL x 4.81" EG. Half way towards my goal! | Current Stats

Short term goal: (3-4 months) 6.8" BPEL, 5.0" EG.. Long term goal (1+ yr): 7.5" BPEL, 5.5" EG.

I agree with that.


2003: 5.75" BPEL, 3" Flacid /2004: 6.75" BPEL, 5" Flacid

2007: 7.5" BPEL, 5.5" Flacid /NOW: 8" BPEL, 5.74" Flacid

/Goal: 8.5" BPEL, 6" Flacid

Originally Posted by Nick33
I know this is a pretty subjective, touchy and even pointless issue with some. But for the sake of personal knowledge and curiosity, I wanted to bring it up. (As I speak I’m currently clamping, haha. How cool am I!)

In what ranges would you consider to be accurate for the following descriptions:

Small:
Below average:
Average:
Above average:
Big/large:
Wow:

What I’ll mainly seek from this research is what is officially considered small, and what is considered big and wow big.

Here’s mine, to use as an example. (I’m not too certain on my answers. Especially around the bigs area.)

Length (NBPEL. No point in using BPEL really, being the uncommon measure.)
Small: 3.0 - 4.7”
Below average: 4.7 - 5.4”
Average: 5.4 - 6.1”
Above average: 6.1 - 6.8”
Big/large: 6.8 - 8.0”
Wow: 8”+

Girth
Small: 3.0 - 4.4”
Below average: 4.4 - 4.7”
Average: 4.7 - 5.0”
Above average: 5.0 - 5.4”
Big/large: 5.4 - 6.0”
Wow: 6.0”+

Well, your right, because this is an opinion issue, and the word ‘average’ would not make sense in this because an average would be much more exact than what some guy thinks the average is. Don’t think I’m picking on you, it’s just that an average isn’t what you think, it’s what it is. Also, how can you have 2 measurements in 2 different categories? If my girth is 5”, (and it is) then is my girth average or above average?

With all that said, I do not think that 4.4” is a small girth at all.

Length Wow

Girth Wow

Is this what your looking for as an description.

Your girth falls between the two of them because of the upper and lower limits of each classification. I don’t see nothing wrong with this assessment. Would it have made more sense if he said: Average: 4.7 - 5.0” Above average: 5.01 - 5.4”

I agree with your averages Nick33.


Started: BPEL: 13 cm / EG: 10.5 cm // 27-06-07

Now: BPEL: 14.1 cm / EG: 10.7 cm // 18-10-07

Goal: BPEL: 17 cm / EG: 13 cm // Soon ;)

Based on this theory I’m in the big to wow area.
I think BPEL should trump NBPEL due to NBPEL be an inconsistent measurement. Yes it is not what you can see but what girlfriend can feel when sex displaces fat pad.

I also think undersides measurements should be considered, when the testicles are hanging at their lowest your at your biggest. 1/3 of your penis length is all of a sudden missing when you only get a top measurement.


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler
Would it have made more sense if he said: Average: 4.7 - 5.0” Above average: 5.01 - 5.4”

Not a bad idea, actually.

Originally Posted by kingpole
Based on this theory I’m in the big to wow area.
I think BPEL should trump NBPEL due to NBPEL be an inconsistent measurement. Yes it is not what you can see but what girlfriend can feel when sex displaces fat pad.

I also think undersides measurements should be considered, when the testicles are hanging at their lowest your at your biggest. 1/3 of your penis length is all of a sudden missing when you only get a top measurement.

Well, I think the key here is determining functional size. Therefore NBPEL measured from the top (shortest) part of the penis should be performed to get the size that is the maximum length, usable during intercourse. IMHO anyway

I consider big as 8NBP and 6.25EG. Wow big as 8.75NBP and 6.75EG. Average 6NBP and 4.9EG. It is wrong but still that is what I think. Following yours Nick, I would be wow in both categories but i dont feel like it.


Obsession is a word used by the lazy to describe the dedicated.

My Pics

AOM's training log

Originally Posted by concrete
Not a bad idea, actually.

Well, I think the key here is determining functional size. Therefore NBPEL measured from the top (shortest) part of the penis should be performed to get the size that is the maximum length, usable during intercourse. IMHO anyway

Men can stick their penis’s in a vagina right up to their testicles, the bottom measurement should be considered. Their is more than meets the eye.


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

I know I do. HEHE.


In search of a perfect body, penis, and girl.

The search NO longer continues. :)

Originally Posted by kingpole
Men can stick their penis’s in a vagina right up to their testicles, the bottom measurement should be considered. Their is more than meets the eye.

Now that I think of it, the distance balls-tip is actually shorter than tip-abdomen, so what you just said makes sense. However, I’m still not sure if it’s the balls that are the limiting factor as they are flexible whereas the abdomen are not. Will you at least agree that measuring from the top is easier and more accurate, though? :)

I agree with Kingpole. BP is a usable measurement, I think it more depends on your body fat percentage if you want to count YOUR BP as real or not. i.e: I am in good shape, my fat pad is about 1/2” and that extra 1/2” goes in the vagina when I go balls deep. (all 7 inches go in) So what would I be considered at over 6.5 NBP and 5.5 EG? Because of my small fat pad and good physical shape, my BP is almost the same anyway. If I was over weight then my fat pad would be bigger, and my cock might only be 5 1/2 NBP or less, and I would NOT be able to fit the entire cock inside a womans vagina. So its all relative to your body fat content IMHO. The bigger the fat pad, the less BP should be considered a usable measurement regarding sexual intercourse. laterz..


Current: BPEL - 7.438" EG - 5.375 (base EG - 5.688") FL - 4.250" FG - 4.438" [19.150 ci]

Future Goal: 8" x 6" (2 red bull cans stacked on top of each other)

"Give them nothing, but take from them everything."

Originally Posted by kingpole
Men can stick their penis’s in a vagina right up to their testicles, the bottom measurement should be considered. Their is more than meets the eye.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I always try to get the testicles in too. It doesn’t work, but I try.

I think Nick has it sussed out pretty well, although in a technical sense an ‘average’ would be a clear-cut mathematical reality. Still, we know what he means.


Before: I'd like to show you something I'm very proud of, but you'll have to move real close.

After: I\'d like to show you something I\'m very proud of, but you guys in the front row will have to stand back.

God gave men both a penis and a brain, but unfortunately not enough blood supply to run both at the same time. - Robin Williams (:

Originally Posted by concrete
Now that I think of it, the distance balls-tip is actually shorter than tip-abdomen, so what you just said makes sense. However, I’m still not sure if it’s the balls that are the limiting factor as they are flexible whereas the abdomen are not. Will you at least agree that measuring from the top is easier and more accurate, though? :)

Only if that measurement is a true BPEL right up to the pubic bone, Some guys dig it into the groove between the top base and under the pubic bone ouch. That measurement should be right on the pubic bone about a 1/4 inch above the penis like in Krowax”s latest pic.

In the bottom measurement the balls should be relaxed for maximum erect length, however in sex and ballooning the testicle enlarge and draw up towards the body, this would be minimum bottom length. Testicles should not be included in the base length measurement.

Oh yes, when you are retaining water your BPEL will be shorter, fluid retention does not shorten bottom measurements.


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
size's PE data revalations 1secjayPenis Enlargement2210-27-2010 08:01 PM
I need a pump with 3 different cylinder sizes, where can I get onenewbie2007Penis Pumps1405-13-2007 08:50 PM
"Warning" Size's Data ChartDino9X7Penis Enlargement801-02-2003 10:03 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 AM.