Am I missing something.

I know I’m pretty new to PE, but I’ve been doing a lot of reading (and stretching and jelqing.I’m a doer and thinker!) and from what I gather so far it seems that the idea that tissue will expand under tensile stress is a pretty established scientific fact. If this is the case, why is there such a vehement rejection of the theories behind PE among the medical establishment? I understand there is no scientific proof of PE, and maybe never will be, but if the idea of biological creep or plastic deformation is accepted then why the strong rejection of the ideas behind PE? Again, am I missing something? Is the idea that ALL human tissue can expand not an accepted fact? For example does the medical community claim that skin has this effect but not connective tissue? On what basis are they so quickly rejecting these ideas? Are their heads really that far up their asses or is the idea that tissue will expand not proven on a scientific level like PE?

Before the established medical profession will admit something is possible, they have to have substantial specific trials giving ‘proof’.

There is no money in it for them ‘if’ stretching and jelqing work, as they are free to do.
So they have no interest in PE - the only medical people who have much to do with the results of PE are urinary-genital specialists, and they only see the bad side, when someone has over-done it and developed erectile dysfunction etc. So the medical profession, while broadly accepting that PE should be possible in theory, for the very reasons you state, will not accept it for it’s own sake.

“All truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,

And third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

(Arthur Schopenhauer)

And fourthly it is forgotten, then it is ridiculed …

We are in a funny place in the cult of science.

There are many things that work, yet science dawdles doing studies, or not even doing studies but pronouncing that these many things are impossible or don`t work or are dangerous.

Like hypnosis for instance.

While I`1m not inferring that PE is like hypnosis, science treats both with a similar sense of disregard.

So I go on in spite of the fact that I have an inch longer dick than a year ago and that I hypnostise people in my work for stop smoking and weight loss and helping them to take plane rides when they couldn`t before, and so on.

We don`t have time for science to get around to “proving” these things so we can get on with our lives.