Believers and non-believers - who is right?
It is good and healthy having an open exchange of opinions regarding the ballzinger.
There are the non-believers (who have never, ever tried the zinger), who will demand absolute, objective, and scientific proof, and the true believers that had actually used and experienced the zinger and swear that it really “works”. But cannot really offer scientific “proof”.
How objective can it be when one can actually feel and see that his balls are “heavier” and the flaccid hang “bigger”? How hard is to proof that an erection is so hard and obvious that one cannot sleep at night? Who should anyone believe?
Does everyone, besides people in these forums, believe that PE works?.
I think that hobby et all, are good and honest veterans of this forum that, on their own ways, have “tried” the zinger and found that it does not work for them. I believe that. And I am sorry it does not work for them.
In my opinion, the ballzinger works for “me” as a package. The sum of its components is more valuable than the individual components themselves. I will even use BEER as an analogy:
Beer is made with hops, malt, yeast and water. Malt is the soul, hops the spice, yeast the spirit and water the body of beer. Take away any of these components, and you no longer have a beer.
So, let’s have a beer and keep commenting on the zinger. Good or bad.
:sheepdo: BALLZINGER :sheepdo: :sheepdo:
Dedicated to Building the Perfect Zinger!