The rare 1% penis-what size?

I’ve been obsessed about this topic for years. Just slightly ahead of ending world poverty and inequality but what do you guys think as the size required to truly be in the top 1% penis size category? So if you’re sitting in some lecture/meeting/theatre with 1000 adults on average you will be 1 of the 10 biggest guys in the room. Assume the 50% penis is 5.5” NBPEL x 5” MSG. Give you estimates in 3 categories: Length, girth, Overall size (Volume). Here are my estimates:

1. Length: 7.5” NBPEL
2. Girth: 6.25” MSG
3. Size: 7.5” NBPEL x 6” MSG

Tough one, Bohm.

I’d say…
1. 8.3” BPEL or 7.8” NBPEL
2. 6.4” MSG
3. 7.9” x 6.1” combined

Anyone else?

I think about this question a lot. When I go to a Giants or Raiders game, I wonder how I’d stack up with all if the guys there.

I am guessing its going to be around 8 inch in length and probably 6 inch in girth or more. What about the 1 in 1,000? or the 1 in 10,000 largest? That would probably be around 10 inch maybe more.

Top 1% would be 1 out of 100 guys not 1 out of 10.

I think your estimates are about correct just from glancing at the lifestyles condom study. Although not sure if being in the top 1% would be ideal for every woman in every situation, although it would be good for the ego.

The thing I am curious about is what if someone with a top 1% naturally hung, started doing serious pe? What would be the possible outcome? What is the maximum length and girth physically possible with a natural hung, then every pe method, and perhaps even surgical enhancement?

Sorry, it was worded badly but you would be 1 of the 10 biggest out of 1000: 10/1000=1%.

His original question is correct. 10 out of 1000 is 1%. He didn’t say the biggest, just among the 1%. The guy with the biggest out of 1000 would be .1%

The ones on the field, right? HA

Odd. I thought people at thunders had stats of people at thunders:

Here on thunders (circa 2009) that is:
Length: ~22.25 cm BPEL = 8.85”
Girth: ~16.50 cm MEG = 6.5”
Volume: ~ 449 cc of size = 27.399 ci

Note: Each result is separate from eachother, so the top 1% of length is…

I would say Bohm being your talking nbpel at 7.5 would put you in that 1%. Now on the girth, I think 6.25 would put you into .5% there are way more long ones than girth ones from what I’ve read and heard.

This all depends on the setting I guess, but here are 2 different situations of top 1% in size, all made up by me ofcourse and all NBP:

a] Soccer stadium in Manila, Philippines - 7 x 5.5

b] Raiders game in Oakland Coliseum - 8.5 x 6.25

I suspect the 99th percentile for BPEL would be a bit in excess of 8”. 8.3” sounds about right. For mid shaft erect girth I would think that 6.25” would be closer to the mark than 6.4”. For volume, I suspect the 99th percentile would be somewhere pretty close to 25 cubic inches, or around 400 cubic centimeters (ml), so various combinations of length and girth would apply, 7” x 6.9” for example.

My starting size was above average, and my experience: I’ve gained next to nothing. I have heard that larger guys have a more difficult time gaining than smaller guys. But I’m not sure if that is really true. I’m going to continue, regardless. :D

I was looking at the spreadsheet, I am not well versed in using Excel and can’t make much of it. I’m wondering if that result is the top 1% of just pre-PE measurements, or is that the top 1% of all lengths in the data. I suspect its the latter - a nearly 9 inch penis is quite large, I would think its closer to .1% of the normal population, but it could be the top 1% of already enlarged penises.