Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

The rare 1% penis-what size?

I don’t mean disrepect Jawbone but if one out of every one hundred guys had a penis that measured 8.5 x 6.25 then there would be about a bazillion of those walking around. If this was true then there would be a ton of amateur pictures on the net of them. I rarely see anything that large on the net. It is purely by observation but I find it hard to believe it would be quite that large of a size. My totally out of my ass guess for the top 1% would 7.6 nbpel, 6.2 girth.

I would guess top 1% is 7.75NBPEL by 6.25EG.

My thoughts on on top 10% is about 7NBPEL by 5.75EG. Does that sound about right?


Pre-PE: BPEL 6.25" NBPEL 5.8" EG 5.75 " Now: BPEL 7" NBPEL 6.5" EG 5.95"

Final goal: BPEL 7.5" NBPEL 7" EG 6"

There seems to be this difference between “scientific” studies and “real” world hunches.

1. I think it’s fair to say if you analyze all the studies on penis size the top 1% size guesstimate:

Length: 7-7.5” NBPEL
Girth: 6”
Size: 7” NBPEL x 6” girth (or equivalent volume)

2. But most of us would think the “real” world 1% values are bigger:

Length: 8” NBPEL
Girth: 6.25-6.5”
Size: 7.5-7.75” NBPEL x 6.25” girth (or equivalent volume)

If one accepts the latter (2) option does that mean that one has to also accept that the often quoted 5.5” x 5” average penis is also questionable? I can’t see how one can avoid it. If you accept option 2. doesn’t it imply that the real world average must be bigger than the the so-called “scientific” average? From a statistical point of view (e.g. Normal distribution, etc.) I don’t see how one can avoid this scenario since those 1% values are based on statistical stuff/standard deviations/means, etc?


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

The studies, and there are a lot of them, have to be accurate. I think that in reality a 7 NBP x 6 EG dick is top 1 percent. But that is size of guys that got a boner in the doctor’s office. We here are measuring our dicks’ largest boner ever. In the middle of active PE’ing and sometimes using morning wood or viagra. We should compare apples to apples. Your “dick study” size would be to work yourself up some random evening without viagra or active PE for a week and get a 3 day average. That might not be the quoted stats that are in Thunders but that’s a “real world” boner size.

Some of our sex boners are much larger than these manually assisted ones, just due to excitement…

I can see how a “boner” for a size measurement is not going to be as large as possible.

Some of the ‘boners for a size measurement” in the studies, though, were doing via chemical administration, which gives you 100%.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Originally Posted by PErsian
This all depends on the setting I guess, but here are 2 different situations of top 1% in size, all made up by me ofcourse and all NBP:

a] Soccer stadium in Manila, Philippines - 7 x 5.5

b] Raiders game in Oakland Coliseum - 8.5 x 6.25

HAHAHAHAAAAA!!!

Originally Posted by bohm
I’ve been obsessed about this topic for years. Just slightly ahead of ending world poverty and inequality ..

If you believe ending inequality is so important then why are you so obsessed with having a bigger penis than everyone else?
Why should the size of one’s penis be any different than the size of one’s bank account?

I love it how the proponents of social and material equality believe it should apply to everyone except themselves.

If we applied the same proposals for creating economic equality to penis size, everyone would end up with a 1 inch penis.

Originally Posted by Lampwick
Some of the ‘boners for a size measurement” in the studies, though, were doing via chemical administration, which gives you 100%.

I think the studies are accurate. For example the one that said maximum stretched length was 6.9. To us it seems too low but that’s because we are comparing our warmed up maximum full force stretch to someone who probably never stretched before,didn’t warm up and isn’t going to pull as hard. If that measurement was non bone pressed then maybe it would have been 7.8 bone pressed. If the dude warmed up with a heating pad and practiced for a week then it would probably have been well over 8 which is probably about right.

My goal is 7 NBPEL but I want that right out of my pants with every boner. Not just on certain days with great boners or after a string of great PE sessions. I think anything that size and bigger is getting near the 1 percent range. This would also mean that if you are always at least 7 NBPEL then on those great days you would be 7.25 or so.

Originally Posted by tinytim
If you believe ending inequality is so important then why are you so obsessed with having a bigger penis than everyone else? Why should the size of one’s penis be any different than the size of one’s bank account? I love it how the proponents of social and material equality believe it should apply to everyone except themselves.If we applied the same proposals for creating economic equality to penis size, everyone would end up with a 1 inch penis.

It was supposed to be a joke. Apparently not a funny one.


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by e211
I think the studies are accurate. For example the one that said maximum stretched length was 6.9.

Let’s forget about guys on Thunder’s who do daily stretching so that maximally stretched length is probably longer than erect length for many (not me, though). I’ve looked at this relationship in a few studies/papers. Although erect length is very closely related to maximally stretched length, the relationship isn’t exact. See Wessels data in Fig. 3 of this pdf below. Looking at that diagram it looks as if erect length is longer than maximally stretched length especially for smaller guys. This is also consistent with one other study which also suggested that erect length is slightly greater than maximally stretched length. This doesn’t appear to be the case for larger guys, though? Maybe I’m reading Fig 3 incorrectly:

http://www.enersol.com.au/CondomSize.pdf

Either way, even if we assume a stretched maximal length of 6.9” as the 1% mark, does that necessarily translate to the same size of 6.9” as the 1% erect length mark?


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)


Last edited by bohm : 12-29-2010 at .

I think you are correct. The 45 degree line of identity on Figure 3 does not go through the origin but intersects the ordinate (erect length) nearly 1 cm above the origin suggesting that flaccid stretched length underestimates erect length by about that much. If so that means that a maximal stretched length of 6.9” (17.5 cm) would be equivalent to an erect length of 7.3” (18.5 cm) or so.

Originally Posted by bohm
It was supposed to be a joke. Apparently not a funny one.

Funny yes, as a joke. It’s often difficult to discern sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek intermingled with legitimate discussion.
Some people make similar ludicrous statements in complete seriousness. It’s hard to let them slide.

Originally Posted by redbear52
I think you are correct. The 45 degree line of identity on Figure 3 does not go through the origin but intersects the ordinate (erect length) nearly 1 cm above the origin suggesting that flaccid stretched length underestimates erect length by about that much. If so that means that a maximal stretched length of 6.9” (17.5 cm) would be equivalent to an erect length of 7.3” (18.5 cm) or so.

In the Wessels original data: the average stretched NBPEL was 5.1” (12.89 cm). The average maximal non-bone pressed stretched length was 4.9” (12.45 cm). I still find it very difficult to believe that anything less than 7” NBPEL is the 1% mark. Even in the Wessels study with ~80 subjects, it looks like there are 6 individuals whose penises are longer than 7” (17.8 cm) NBPEL. Look at the dots in the curve in Fig. 3. It was a good study because it also included guys from different nationalities (black, white and Asian), if I recall.


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

I do this all the time. Whenever I am bouncing (my night job) I always wonder who has the biggest dick out of the entire crowd.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 AM.