There seems to be this difference between “scientific” studies and “real” world hunches.
1. I think it’s fair to say if you analyze all the studies on penis size the top 1% size guesstimate:
Length: 7-7.5” NBPEL
Girth: 6”
Size: 7” NBPEL x 6” girth (or equivalent volume)
2. But most of us would think the “real” world 1% values are bigger:
Length: 8” NBPEL
Girth: 6.25-6.5”
Size: 7.5-7.75” NBPEL x 6.25” girth (or equivalent volume)
If one accepts the latter (2) option does that mean that one has to also accept that the often quoted 5.5” x 5” average penis is also questionable? I can’t see how one can avoid it. If you accept option 2. doesn’t it imply that the real world average must be bigger than the the so-called “scientific” average? From a statistical point of view (e.g. Normal distribution, etc.) I don’t see how one can avoid this scenario since those 1% values are based on statistical stuff/standard deviations/means, etc?
Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)
Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)