Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

different races and dick sizes

1234

different races and dick sizes

is there any survey on diff races and their average dick sizes,showing which race has the biggest penis sizes and which has the least average sizes,just curious

Yes, but I have lost the link. Just do a google search on it. The one I found was extensive and done races, countries world wide, states in the US, and several other comparisons. I found out that my state had the smallest penis’ in the US per capita! Yeah, lucky me! I think worlwide, the largest was an African country.

Keep in mind though, the differences are rather small anyway. As much as no one wants to hear it, 6 x 5 is still pretty much a solid average worldwide.


Starting stats NBPEL 6" x EG 4.125" --> Mar 2008 NBPEL 7" x EG 5.25" Current Stats 7" NBPEL x 5.75" EG (Post 1st Round PMMA)

My noose style extender modification

My jelq routine

i dont think that 6times 5 is the average i read before it was like 5-5.5 besides 5 in girth?i dont think so besides some claimed that even these measurments are over rated cause guys just like to say they are bigger,not sure though

Girth average is actually listed at alot of sites as 4.8”.


Starting stats NBPEL 6" x EG 4.125" --> Mar 2008 NBPEL 7" x EG 5.25" Current Stats 7" NBPEL x 5.75" EG (Post 1st Round PMMA)

My noose style extender modification

My jelq routine

5.75 x 5.


Started: NBPEL 5.5 == EG: 5

Current: NBPEL 7.5 == EG: 6

Goal: NBPEL 8 == EG: 6

Originally Posted by 9_in_richard
Yes, but I have lost the link. Just do a google search on it. The one I found was extensive and done races, countries world wide, states in the US, and several other comparisons. I found out that my state had the smallest penis’ in the US per capita! Yeah, lucky me! I think worlwide, the largest was an African country.

Keep in mind though, the differences are rather small anyway. As much as no one wants to hear it, 6 x 5 is still pretty much a solid average worldwide.

I’d like to see it, because I think I have run across that too, and all it was, was sliced up data from something like the Definitive Penis Size Survey, which is not a valid survey due to complete lack of rigor and protocol.

Is this the thing you saw?

Http://www.free-condom-stuff.com/penis_size.asp

This baffles me, because this domain is registered to Ansell and you would think they’d be more careful about the content, given their meticulous approach with the LifeStyles survey in Cancun.

Notice they include results from a Nigerian survey but it’s only 18 guys. And they don’t mention how the measurement was obtained. I find all of this content to be highly suspect.

And furthermore, it does no good to state an average without stating what kind of measurement it is. Is it BPEL, or not? Is the girth measured base or midshaft? These are critical differences in the measurement technique that can be responsible for variance of more than one SD.

I’d say that the statement, “As much as no one wants to hear it, 6 x 5 is still pretty much a solid average worldwide.”, falls into the category of ambiguous but interesting. The length *might* be accurate if that is BPEL although from all the studies I have seen it’s a bit on the high side. The girth *may* be accurate if measured at the thickest point, whatever that might be.


4/2008 Bpel 6.50, Beg 5.5, Mseg 4.9

6/2008 Bpel 6.75, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

9/2008 Bpel 7.00, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1


Last edited by Fantom : 12-24-2008 at .

Fantom — You are absolutely right - that page is about the goofiest thing I have ever seen. Why would Ansell do something like this? Totally irresponsible. I would fire the guy who put that together.

tornadoman - if you want something that is goofy and fun, check out http://www.thevisualiser.net/

You can create an “image” of your penis by entering your length and girth stats, then you can compare to “average caucasian” “average asian” “average black guy,” “lifestyles average” as well as the kinsey and durex size study. And then several brand name porn stars. etc etc.

DISCLAIMER — I don’t know where they got their data on different ethnic groups because I never dug that deep into the site. The site is just for fun as far as I am concerned. I would stick with the lifestyles, durex, and kinsey data and not worry about the other stuff.


Last edited by sta-kool : 12-24-2008 at .

tornadoman,

There is a survey on guys that don’t post according to Forum Guidelines and that survey says they don’t last long around here.


The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

Originally Posted by Fantom
I’d like to see it, because I think I have run across that too, and all it was, was sliced up data from something like the Definitive Penis Size Survey, which is not a valid survey due to complete lack of rigor and protocol.

Is this the thing you saw?

Http://www.free-condom-stuff.com/penis_size.asp

This baffles me, because this domain is registered to Ansell and you would think they’d be more careful about the content, given their meticulous approach with the LifeStyles survey in Cancun.

Notice they include results from a Nigerian survey but it’s only 18 guys. And they don’t mention how the measurement was obtained. I find all of this content to be highly suspect.

And furthermore, it does no good to state an average without stating what kind of measurement it is. Is it BPEL, or not? Is the girth measured base or midshaft? These are critical differences in the measurement technique that can be responsible for variance of more than one SD.

I’d say that the statement, “As much as no one wants to hear it, 6 x 5 is still pretty much a solid average worldwide.”, falls into the category of ambiguous but interesting. The length *might* be accurate if that is BPEL although from all the studies I have seen it’s a bit on the high side. The girth *may* be accurate if measured at the thickest point, whatever that might be.

The “average” arguments can be argued to the end of time, but I will always personally consider and believe that 6 x 5 is an average measure to base from. As for bone pressed measurements, no one outside of a PE community is going to consider a BPL and NBPL or BPFSL or any of those things. I personally believe, as we are all entitled to our opinnions, that bone pressed measurements are BS. If I can’t drop it from my drawers and show it to you, then it doesn’t count.

I am currently edging on the 5.5” girth mark, but I will never refer to my penis as a 5.5” girth until it’s cemented. Can I hit a 5.5” post jelq, yes I can. Am I a 5.5” girth, No. When I can whip it out cold and measure a 5.5” girth without PE’ing it first for more than 60 days or so, then I’ll call it 5.5 and change my stats.

I know that this will get the BP guys flaming and I guess that’s just going to have to be the way it is. But, if you have to cram a ruler into your groin so deep that you’re damn near committing pubic suicide to measure that extra 1/2” then I personally won’t claim that 1/2”. I will only claim what the world sees when it’s out and about and that’s 7 x 5.25.

Besides, does lowering the average in a guys mind really make them feel more accomplished in their PE quest. Kind of like guys at the gym who use crappy form and swing the curl weights with their bodies or only come half way down on the bench press. You can claim to the world that your benching 350, but until you touch that bar to those pecs, pause and throw that shit up, you aren’t able to bench 350. You are just deluding yourself and anyone who sees your crap form is going to know that you are BS.

If you show a 6” cock and claim a 7” with a 1” pubic fat pad, I call BS. Hell, you also got more anchored to that pubic area with suspensory ligament. Whats next MRI’s to claim SLBPEL (Suspensatory Limited Bone Pressed Erect Length)?

If your under 6 x 5 then have faith, do the work and beat the the average and then be proud of your accomplishment. If you’re already over 6 x 5 then consider yourself blessed and be proud of your accomplishments. If your 6 x 5, then you’re in a huge brotherhood statistically, so be proud of that and focus on beating the average.

I say this in the interest of PE. I wish everyone the best in their personal journey and everyone is entitled to their opinions and this one is mine. I do not wish to argue the great, never ending “average” debate. I just believe that trying to claim a much smaller average than the studies show is cheapening the purpose of PE and is invalid.

In answer to your query, No, that is not the site or study that I referenced. I wish I had saved that link, it was very in depth and interesting. I do not ever read studies from sites that are biased (sales), not based in a scientific study, or presented by a marketing company for any PE or sex product.


Starting stats NBPEL 6" x EG 4.125" --> Mar 2008 NBPEL 7" x EG 5.25" Current Stats 7" NBPEL x 5.75" EG (Post 1st Round PMMA)

My noose style extender modification

My jelq routine


Last edited by 9_in_richard : 12-24-2008 at .

Just a question, do we get a thread like this every week? lol, sure seems like it.

:horse:

Originally Posted by gprent
tornadoman,

There is a survey on guys that don’t post according to Forum Guidelines and that survey says they don’t last long around here.


Originally Posted by cheeva
:horse:

:rolling: @ both posts!


PE for length: so her heart stops when she sees it. PE for girth: to get her heart started again!

One need only leave the surface of the planet to realize we are all one people.

Originally Posted by 9_in_richard
I know that this will get the BP guys flaming and I guess that’s just going to have to be the way it is. But, if you have to cram a ruler into your groin so deep that you’re damn near committing pubic suicide to measure that extra 1/2” then I personally won’t claim that 1/2”. I will only claim what the world sees when it’s out and about and that’s 7 x 5.25.

No flaming, I definitely get your point and agree with you to a certain extent.

But here’s my take on BPEL vs NBPEL:

— Basically BPEL is a “scientific” measurement, not a “bragging rights” measurement.

BPEL is a technical measurement - its purpose is for tracking PE gains (or lack of gains) so you can adjust your routine. NBPEL isn’t any good for tracking PE gains because it doesn’t take into account fluctuations in fat pad. That can vary even daily! (how much water did you drink today? did you eat a ham sandwich and a bag of doritos? Lots of salt, your fat pad is bigger!) My fat pad seems to vary between 1/3 and 1/2, sometimes it will be as low as 1/4 (Man i LOVE those days!!!!!!!) So it is useful for me to try to eliminate the fat pad variable with a BPEL measurement.

However:

— In “real world” sex if you go balls deep in some positions you are most likely delivering “near BPEL”, as your fat pad compresses against your partner’s body.

NBPEL “I will only claim what the world sees” - That is a little tricky, at least in my mind — what is that exactly?

For example, a woman sees your penis from different perspectives. Her first views were probably from the front or the side. Then there is a bottom view.

She most likely rarely sees the —exact— same top view that we see — we see it straight on (kind of a “flat” view), she sees it from a slightly different angle (more “3-D”).

I notice that if I measure visible penis from the side, I get the same or better measurement that my top BPEL measurement.

I think it is Tazbonito who advocates measuring NBPEL that way - visible penis from the side. And it sort of makes sense, as nobody really sees the exact top down perspective except for us

When I read stories here about women talk about their HUGE ex-boyfriends, I often think some of these women “guesstimate” based on a bottom view.

(But I do definitely get your point, and it is a good one)

Anyway, just some things floating around my head about the difference between the two.


Last edited by sta-kool : 12-24-2008 at .

Dude, I can’t even bring myself to reply to the BP NBP anymore. Let’s just agree to disagree. This topic is worn out. Like I said everyone has and is entitled to their opinion. Besides, I have no intention of indirectly hijacking this thread. The race information is out there. You just have to do the leg work and find it and don’t get your statistical data from phalloplasty sites, enlargement sites or any site related to porn or trying to market a product. Just my .02


Starting stats NBPEL 6" x EG 4.125" --> Mar 2008 NBPEL 7" x EG 5.25" Current Stats 7" NBPEL x 5.75" EG (Post 1st Round PMMA)

My noose style extender modification

My jelq routine

9_in_richard, trust me I am not arguing with you — just babbling. Thought I had put enough “hints” in the post that I even “agree with your disagreement”.

Plus tornadoman has a “How Do I Measure” thread up too, so it all kind of interconnects.

Top
1234

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.