Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Smaller Guys Gain MORE

Here’s for the “old farts.” I’m in my mid-sixties, started to lose erections in the middle of intercourse—very troubling. My urologist gave me viagra, but I hate the side effects. So I started PE last October. I was always well hung: 7 3/4” by 6”. Are you ready? I’m in my fifth month, and without mechanical devices, I am now 10 1/2” by 7”. But the best part is the PC flexes. I’m getting rock hard erections like a teenager. Hard to believe, but true. By the way, I’m in great physical shape (for an old fart). Long live PE!! Wish I had discovered it ten years ago.

Horsehung

Horsehung,
Do you have any pics of that monster cock by any chance?

wcraig, another “mature” member reported impressive gains for someone so new to the scene. You can read his story here: A senior citizen, the pump and exercises—great results


"Only enemies speak the truth; friends and lovers lie endlessly, caught in the web of duty". -Roland, in Stephen King's The Last Gunslinger

I feel I must post an opposing view.

I started off already quite large (7.75”) and within 2-3 weeks gained 1/4”. Still been gaining since but it has slowed down.

My LOT is somewhere about 8:30-9.

whoareyou,
Nice early gains by the way. And at 7.75” you were quite large to start. However, early gains are often quick - but tend to quickly taper off. I suppose that what I’m saying is, you’ll be refuting my theory when you’re 9.75-10” (a 2-2.25” gain). And even at that, to equal the gains of the big gainers I mentioned when I started this thread, you’d have to hit 11.25 to 12.25 inches EL. And that’s not a relative gain, actually - it’s just equal to the 3.5-4.5 inches they’ve gained. Relatively speaking, you’d have to hit over 14” EL to equal their gains proportionally (which would give you a penis larger than any has ever been clinically measured).

- w a d

Oh yeh, sure, I dont want to gain that much anyways, but didn’t I hear several people mention that its “nearly impossible” for big guys to gain much, or something along those lines?

I mean, put it this way, if I gain 1 inch, That will probably be too much. Lets be serious, 9” is probably more that most women could handle. Shit I’ve had many women with trouble with my 8”.

Psychologically, I don’t think most people would be insane enough to want an 12” dick anyways, since well, they can have one but might not ever get to use it.

I contend that it is possible for big guys to gain just as much, however there is also a limit to reasonableness.

While 12” sounds cool, no man in their right mind would aim for that lest he be mistaken for a tree trunk.

Originally Posted by whoareyou
Oh yeh, sure, I dont want to gain that much anyways, but didn’t I hear several people mention that its “nearly impossible” for big guys to gain much, or something along those lines?

I mean, put it this way, if I gain 1 inch, That will probably be too much. Lets be serious, 9” is probably more that most women could handle. Shit I’ve had many women with trouble with my 8”.

Psychologically, I don’t think most people would be insane enough to want an 12” dick anyways, since well, they can have one but might not ever get to use it.

I contend that it is possible for big guys to gain just as much, however there is also a limit to reasonableness.

While 12” sounds cool, no man in their right mind would aim for that lest he be mistaken for a tree trunk.


Sure, I wouldn’t want 12” either (maybe for a week or 2 - just to show it off & shock people, but I wouldn’t want to be stuck with it).
I don’t recall anybody saying it was “near impossible” for a big guy to make length gains - just tougher than it is for a smaller guy. I would even argue that a guy with 5” is more likely to gain 3” than a guy starting with 7 inches. Logically, that would not seem to be the case as the smaller guy is looking for a 60% length increase, but the larger guy is only seeking about 42% more length. Yet, the progress reports here would seem to suggest that it is the case.
While Bib started out with 6 and made huge gains, he’s the hanging guru. Probably nobody has logged more hours with iron dangling from his dick than Bib has.
As for RWG, I think his problem is that his cock is like a brick. He probably needs about 3,000 psi of tractile force to stretch that damn thing. I’d suggest he attach a block-n-tackle to a support beam in his basement. Then he’d need to anchor himself securely, in order to stay on the floor.
I also like to go balls-deep in the snatch, and with 9” or more it would be tough to find women who’d let you ram it to the hilt.

Originally Posted by horsehung
Here’s for the “old farts.” I’m in my mid-sixties, started to lose erections in the middle of intercourse—very troubling. My urologist gave me viagra, but I hate the side effects. So I started PE last October. I was always well hung: 7 3/4” by 6”. Are you ready? I’m in my fifth month, and without mechanical devices, I am now 10 1/2” by 7”. But the best part is the PC flexes. I’m getting rock hard erections like a teenager. Hard to believe, but true. By the way, I’m in great physical shape (for an old fart). Long live PE!! Wish I had discovered it ten years ago.

Horsehung


horse,
Did I just read that you’ve gained 2.75” of EL in less than 5 months?? That would translate into a volume increase of about 84%.

- w a d

-w a d

That’s right. And it feels like it even when it’s flaccid. No, I have no pics. I read wcraig’s story. I also have a theory about the older men gaining more easily than the younger men. I think they may approach the whole process a little less frantically. I stopped counting reps, etc. after six weeks and just focused on listening to my body. That includes my penis, of course. I stop when I feel really fatigued or if I feel any pain. If I’m in a good place, I’ll go for at least 90 minutes, jelq, stretching, etc. I think older men can also go longer without ejaculating, which for PE, is good. I hate to see people hurting themselves, especially with the various hanging devices. Slow and easy is better. Just like sex.

Horsehung

Originally Posted by horsehung
Here’s for the “old farts.” I’m in my mid-sixties, started to lose erections in the middle of intercourse—very troubling. My urologist gave me viagra, but I hate the side effects. So I started PE last October. I was always well hung: 7 3/4” by 6”. Are you ready? I’m in my fifth month, and without mechanical devices, I am now 10 1/2” by 7”. But the best part is the PC flexes. I’m getting rock hard erections like a teenager. Hard to believe, but true. By the way, I’m in great physical shape (for an old fart). Long live PE!! Wish I had discovered it ten years ago.

Horsehung

As a man, my hat is off to you.

I believe that the size of one’s genitals is determined by genetics, dht levels in the body and androgen receptors in the penis. I have read a study that connected low dht levels with a thin tunica. So if one has a small penis due to low dht or few androgen receptors, it could be that the tunica is also thin and easier to stretch.

Originally Posted by Jambaz
I believe that the size of one’s genitals is determined by genetics, dht levels in the body and androgen receptors in the penis. I have read a study that connected low dht levels with a thin tunica. So if one has a small penis due to low dht or few androgen receptors, it could be that the tunica is also thin and easier to stretch.


This could offer a valid theory - if the undersized penis was due to hormonal deficiencies. I would bet, with most small guys, that an undersized penis probably does have a thinner tunica; hence, is more easily stretched.

This is another reason why I believe that periodic breaks from PE are very important - for tunica deconditioning. It’s the “how often” and the “how long” that are matters for experimentation, differing from one guy to the next.

I don’t think the link between thinner tunica <-> easier to stretch is valid in your tunica representation model. Whenever you stretch something it gets thinner. After a growthspurt tunicawise I would think the tunica is thinner than before, but harder to stretch. Then it is waiting till the tunica is ‘healed’ in the extended state so this becomes his normal state where it has regained some stretchability. In order to regain that stretchability the tunica would have to get thicker again I think, otherwise it would be getting thinner and thinner.

Originally Posted by Piet
In order to regain that stretchability the tunica would have to get thicker again I think, otherwise it would be getting thinner and thinner.

Yes, the tunica does thicken - which is why further gains become increasingly more difficult. Bib has written extensively on this subject.

I mean when you stretch your tunica it gets thinner and in order to stretch it further it has to grow thicker first. But perhaps that’s what you are already saying :)

Originally Posted by RB
Hanging to and at fatigue is the answer. I’m thoroughly convinced of this. If you are not consistently reaching fatigue, you are playing with yourself versus pe’ing. I’ve been hanging two sets every morning with total focus being on hitting fatigue asap, and riding it.
Remember, I don’t believe Bib quit hanging cause he stopped gaining. He quit because he got all he needed. If you aren’t fatiguing your tunica, you aren’t gonna gain.

That cannot be said enough. Anyone complaining about not making gains by manual stretching needs to hear this. Great post,RB.My thoughts exactly.
Alice

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 AM.