I don’t think so, no one ever found a statistically significative difference in penile size among different ethnicities. I am not saying that there aren’t difference for sure, what I am saying and since now it is more proven the adverse statement, that there is no difference; nothing conclusively proven though. Anyway, be careful in not fallin in stereotypes. The Indian study measured the NBPEL I think, not the BPEL. So Indians would be longer than average race, according to this very same study.
Well, damn, I didn’t see that one coming. It indeed was measured NBPEL.
I found the full study here: http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/…l/3901569a.html
The methodology states: “Penile length was defined as the linear distance along the dorsal side of the penis extending from the pubo – penile skin junction to the tip of the glans.”
The pubo-penile junction is the point where the penis meets the fat pad, so it actually was NBPEL. It did not mention anything about pushing into the pubo-penile junction, so clearly this is NBPEL.
5.1 inches NBPEL would be about 5.85 inches BPEL on average. I guess Indians do have an average length.