The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.
I think your numbers are all way off.They no where near resemble reality.
All right, do you think a 12” does not exist? I was merely critizing the BS huffington post chart for saying penises from basically 10” and up does not exist, which we have proof they do.
Start 7.28
Goal 9.2 nbp
Yeah, here is the guy on the forum 746450-1519804238-05629d46be22e0dbb34547576c66105a.jpg 11.5" nbp when taking into account how far the ruler is from the pubic bone where it lays on the table. so the 12" bpel estimation was conservative.
I’m calling bullshit on the picture.
If you look closely at the right leg, you will notice it is smaller than the left…. where the ruler is placed.
I’m guessing it’s more like around 8" long.
If you look at the photos at the beginning of his thread, you will notice he uses a toilet roll and a sticky note. Both are easy to trim with a pair of scissors.
The other pictures are of a flaccid that is fluffed up or a full on semi. I can make mine look simpler after PEing.
Starting Stats: BPEL 7.0¨ x MEG 5.3¨ (4th Nov 2015)
Current Stats: BPEL 7.83¨ x MEG 5.6¨ (14th June 2018)
The Dream: BPEL 8.1¨ x EG 6.1¨ (Not sure if the wife supports ¨the dream¨)
I certainly still think that the near 12” one in that pic is likely a fake. Some of the data on the previous page though strikes me as pure and utter BS. Suggesting that only 9% are over 7 is totally false. I have encountered enough 7+ that I could have been a lotto winner with those odds. Anyone can also feel free to look at the progress pics on this forum and look how very few guys start at 5.5” or less. Even if we’re assuming it’s biased towards larger there are so many more starting over six and yet statistics say 6 puts you at larger than 55% I just don’t buy that.
All right, do you think a 12” does not exist? I was merely critizing the BS huffington post chart for saying penises from basically 10” and up does not exist, which we have proof they do.
If the Earth’s population is 7,442,000,000, then by Huffington Post’s calculations there is 1 man with a 12” cock. Actually less than one man: only 0.000431636 of a man. So, srsabpe is kinda right. Anybody is welcome to re-calculate this; I’m no math genius by any stretch.
Director, Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI), Thundersplace | Land Acknowledgment
If the Earth’s population is 7,442,000,000, then by Huffington Post’s calculations there is 1 man with a 12” cock. Actually less than one man: only 0.000431636 of a man. So, srsabpe is kinda right. Anybody is welcome to re-calculate this; I’m no math genius by any stretch.
“So you’re saying there’s a chance…..?”
Once upon a time (2015): 6.40” x 4.50”
Today: 7.25” x 5.00”, Thunder Cocks Unite!
I’m calling bullshit on the picture.
I’m semi calling bullshit. But I’m not sure that he has bad intentions. Measuring accurately is tough. He’s big, no doubt. However:
1. That is an 11-inch ruler, not 12-inch.
2. He is not taking the picture straight above the head. That would show exactly where the tip lands. Instead, he is taking it from near his body or possibly mid-point.
3. Using that “below the penis” type of measuring system adds at least 1/2 inch. It seems illogical, and I’m not sure why this happens. But I just tried it myself and suddenly, lo and behold, I was 8 inches long.
Mitigating some of this, though, is that he starts the ruler a little farther up the cock.
Long story short: yes it’s monster meat, but how much exactly is debatable.
Director, Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI), Thundersplace | Land Acknowledgment
I’m semi calling bullshit. But I’m not sure that he has bad intentions. Measuring accurately is tough. He’s big, no doubt. However:1. That is an 11-inch ruler, not 12-inch.
2. He is not taking the picture straight above the head. That would show exactly where the tip lands. Instead, he is taking it from near his body or possibly mid-point.
3. Using that “below the penis” type of measuring system adds at least 1/2 inch. It seems illogical, and I’m not sure why this happens. But I just tried it myself and suddenly, lo and behold, I was 8 inches long.Mitigating some of this, though, is that he starts the ruler a little farther up the cock.
Long story short: yes it’s monster meat, but how much exactly is debatable.
So in the first pic if you use his waist as a reference and were to swing the cock to the left or the right the head would pass the width of his body. I measured from my center to past my thighs, the dude is extremely big, approaching ten. His head would pass the width of his waist and that’s prior to considering bone press. I am not calling bs yet.
Once upon a time (2015): 6.40” x 4.50”
Today: 7.25” x 5.00”, Thunder Cocks Unite!
So in the first pic if you use his waist as a reference and were to swing the cock to the left or the right the head would pass the width of his body. I measured from my center to past my thighs, the dude is extremely big, approaching ten. His head would pass the width of his waist and that’s prior to considering bone press. I am not calling bs yet.
Yeah, that’s a good point. If a guy was skinny and had thin thighs, his member might reach or exceed his outer thigh boundary. But based on the fat pad of this particular person, he’s “comfortably” built (no judgement - I’m working on weight, too), which only reinforces the swing-left/swing-right notion.
Director, Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI), Thundersplace | Land Acknowledgment
There was something about the measuring with a ruler photo I didn’t like when I first saw it.
I have a similar body type, so thought I’d take a photo of myself, at the same angle as the one shown to compare with a ruler.
I then scaled both pictures as close as possible to each other. It was while doing this that I discovered that the right leg was 2/3’s the size of the left.
I then scaled the left leg to the same measurement as mine, while using my ruler in my picture to then calculate the length of his penis. He came in around 8” nbpel approx.
And like I said, in his first photos the items used as a reference could have been easily manipulated.
Starting Stats: BPEL 7.0¨ x MEG 5.3¨ (4th Nov 2015)
Current Stats: BPEL 7.83¨ x MEG 5.6¨ (14th June 2018)
The Dream: BPEL 8.1¨ x EG 6.1¨ (Not sure if the wife supports ¨the dream¨)
I’m calling bullshit on the picture.If you look closely at the right leg, you will notice it is smaller than the left…. where the ruler is placed.
I’m guessing it’s more like around 8" long.
If you look at the photos at the beginning of his thread, you will notice he uses a toilet roll and a sticky note. Both are easy to trim with a pair of scissors.
The other pictures are of a flaccid that is fluffed up or a full on semi. I can make mine look simpler after PEing.
Agreed I was thinking the exact same thing regarding the toilet roll and post it note.To me they looked like trimmed down mini versions of them former selves.
Busy Building a big dick with AM 2.
There was something about the measuring with a ruler photo I didn’t like when I first saw it.I have a similar body type, so thought I’d take a photo of myself, at the same angle as the one shown to compare with a ruler.
I then scaled both pictures as close as possible to each other. It was while doing this that I discovered that the right leg was 2/3’s the size of the left.
I then scaled the left leg to the same measurement as mine, while using my ruler in my picture to then calculate the length of his penis. He came in around 8” nbpel approx.
And like I said, in his first photos the items used as a reference could have been easily manipulated.
I measured a toilet roll and found a 1:2 (width:length) ratio. I then measured his photo and found a 1:2 ratio, as well. So, the roll looks real. Snipping off the end of the roll would give it a shorter, stubbier look—a different ratio. On the other hand, a motivated person could cut down both width and length, producing a midget-sized roll. I kinda doubt this, but technically is possible and easy to do.
Director, Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI), Thundersplace | Land Acknowledgment
I measured a toilet roll and found a 1:2 (width:length) ratio. I then measured his photo and found a 1:2 ratio, as well. So, the roll looks real. Snipping off the end of the roll would give it a shorter, stubbier look—a different ratio. On the other hand, a motivated person could cut down both width and length, producing a midget-sized roll. I kinda doubt this, but technically is possible and easy to do.
You are making the presumption that all toliet rolls are the same diameter on this planet. This has been debated before on the “great” can you get your penis in the toliet roll test.
Even though, as you’ve stated, it would be easy to run a pair of scissors down the length of the roll, then over lap the ends, so reducing the diameter. And then cut the end off. A lot easier than using a shaving gel can, if you want to deceive someone.
I’m only giving my opinion though, and you are of course welcome to yours. :)
However, nobody has explained the reason for the smaller right leg yet. If the picture has been manipulated, it would show willingness to deceive, as well as the motivation to construct alternative ways to deceive.
Starting Stats: BPEL 7.0¨ x MEG 5.3¨ (4th Nov 2015)
Current Stats: BPEL 7.83¨ x MEG 5.6¨ (14th June 2018)
The Dream: BPEL 8.1¨ x EG 6.1¨ (Not sure if the wife supports ¨the dream¨)
I’m calling bullshit on the picture.If you look closely at the right leg, you will notice it is smaller than the left…. where the ruler is placed.
I’m guessing it’s more like around 8" long.
If you look at the photos at the beginning of his thread, you will notice he uses a toilet roll and a sticky note. Both are easy to trim with a pair of scissors.
The other pictures are of a flaccid that is fluffed up or a full on semi. I can make mine look simpler after PEing.
Image Edited? says the picture is legit. My eyes says the picture is legit. Try again the guy has a 12" penis, end of story.
Start 7.28
Goal 9.2 nbp
There was something about the measuring with a ruler photo I didn’t like when I first saw it.I have a similar body type, so thought I’d take a photo of myself, at the same angle as the one shown to compare with a ruler.
I then scaled both pictures as close as possible to each other. It was while doing this that I discovered that the right leg was 2/3’s the size of the left.
I then scaled the left leg to the same measurement as mine, while using my ruler in my picture to then calculate the length of his penis. He came in around 8" nbpel approx.
And like I said, in his first photos the items used as a reference could have been easily manipulated.
You have a forum history of not being able to accept other people having a 10" + penis. It is a problem in your head and does not change the reality of the fact that yes -lots and lots of people have a penis between 10-12 inches. And this guy who’s penis can be viewed in the thread 7 months in with huge newbie gains 9 inch is 12" BPEL. There is proof in a NON MANIPULATED photo that he is 11.5"+ NBPEL.
Again to make it extremely simple NO PHOTO in THIS thread 7 months in with huge newbie gains 9 inch is manipulated according to Image Edited? .
Start 7.28
Goal 9.2 nbp
I agree that size matter and it should be of 6” which is an ideal size of a penis. But As per I know and you guys can also understand the value of erections and girth or a penis rather than only focusing on size. Let me tell you one practical moment, If you hold a longer penis but you are only able to have sex for 2 minuets then how will you be able to satisfy your girl.