I should make distinctions here.
What is real is what we are given and what many here are able to effect positively.
What is symbolic is what penises mean culturally, etc.
And what is fantasy is that which is amplified, distorted and edited.
What works in real terms is most men’s penises the way they naturally are.
What is symbolic is what penises represent and why we need a big one. Much like a flash car, or a Rolex.
In fantasy terms, for men, unless you are homosexual it is virtually meaningless and probably something we should leave for her consumption because, like in the twilight movie that I sat through out of obligation, we can’t give 50 MPH flying piggybacks.
So, in conclusion, getting caught up in matching her symbolic or fantasy representations of penis size does nothing but set one up for failure.
My thanks to Sigmund Freud and Jacques lacan, and more recently Slavoj Zizek for all that, and my sincere apologies to readers who may gave nodded off.
I read that three times and still couldn’t grasp WTH you said! And I’m only on my first Captain-n-Coke!! LOL
But to the topic of the post, huge and “well endowed” (I’ve always hated that term) are totally subjective. Even when objective stats and measurements are considered, other factors like culture, region, race and ethnicity (yes, you have to include those) play a role. And THEN there are wild cards and variables within each of those areas that my skew the outcomes. That’s why size comparisons are never concrete or even suggested - it’s lose-lose.