Height: 68.5”
Pre PE Length: 5.75
Pre PE Girth: 5.4
baxwumaz
Height vs. Length vs. Girth Project
Trekker
Height 72”
Pre PE BPEL 5.25”
Pre PE MEG 5.0”
Stone phallus totem in Formosa Aboriginal Cultural Village
MajorSmile
This old thread is extremely depressing, I’ve gone through all 49 pages, so many guys around my height (75”) with 7.5”+ BPEL starting size when I’m still only 5.5”-6” BPEL after more than 13 years of PE. Only one or two guys 74” or above with a starting size with 5.5” BPEL or less.
Short term goal: 5.25" NBPEL by 31/12/2019
Ultimate goal: 6"+ NBPEL x 5.5"+ girth. Hoping to reach 6" NBPEL by 20/5/2020, my 37th birthday
Dream size: 8"+ NBPEL x 6"+ girth
inorlol
Height 72”
Pre PE BPEL 8.85”
Pre PE MEG 5.0”
Inicio: 24.7cm BP x 15,7cm EG | Started: 9.75" BP x 6.2" EG
Meta: 25,5cm BP x 18cm EG | Goal: 10" BP X 7" EG
Garvi
Height: 70” (178cm)
Pre PE:
-BPEL: 5.7” (14.5 cm)
-EG: 5.7” (14.5cm)
>>> Start: 14'5 cm (5.7") BP - 14'5 (5.7") EG
>>> 14 meses de PE: 18'4cm (7¼") BP - 16'2cm ( 6⅜") EG
>>> Tras 6 meses de parón: 17'6cm BP - 15'7cm EG |----> Progresos Garvi
MHedberg
Originally Posted by Mikexxx
Any chart?
The OP hasn’t been around in 10years. Is there anyone else that might like to go through 50pages, put in a high amount of time and effort, and create a chart/graph of all the information here?
Garvi
Originally Posted by MHedberg
The OP hasn’t been around in 10years. Is there anyone else that might like to go through 50pages, put in a high amount of time and effort, and create a chart/graph of all the information here?
…post #676
Originally Posted by Tbgame
Ok, I’ve been thinking about all of this and it seems the increments of .3 ” every 3 ” taller is right on the money if someone wants a simple answer to this 10 years old thread. In the second group of 74 + vs the second group of less taller men at 71, 72, 73 there’s a difference of .4676. It is higher than the .3 estimate but I was pretty generous in my survey. Also, the group of 74+ consist of more variables but not many more, there is one entry at 79 and another one at 78, for the rest its close to being group 74, 75, 76.Doing the input I was a tiny bit underwhelmed to be honest but there is, I think, a clear indication that height, most likely, will factor in into a bigger unit at first glance. Always keep in mind that most women likes tall men and if you present them pictures of different shapes of men, according to some vanilla studies, women prefer overall tall men with relatively bigger unit. Also the estimate of 7” for the 74, 75, 76 is just an average.
Ultimately, I know people won’t like it but all of this and the analysis on post 463 seems to indicate that taller is a factor. It also seems logical also to take for instance a cute girl with 6’5” male. The guy is more likely packing at least 7.5. Think about the perspective of 6’5” male with a 5.5 unit? Hopefully, size is not all that matter quite honestly, knowledge is also very important. Knowledge of your partner(s).
Overall, I was generous in my input, there is very few way to measure exactly everyone, the main reason why I didn’t bother with girth, way too complicated to get a precise answer that is for sure and keep in mind, the portion of data I took was from page 43 to 30. That timeline of 2010 to 2016 coincided for being some sort of golden age of pumping accessories designed for enhancement, the info is also more available. Even if the study said before PE it doesn’t matter if people didn’t comply, you loose a bit of edge over time, if you smoke, not being active. Doing PE will help regain that lost edge. So overall, yes but how many factors there is?
>>> Start: 14'5 cm (5.7") BP - 14'5 (5.7") EG
>>> 14 meses de PE: 18'4cm (7¼") BP - 16'2cm ( 6⅜") EG
>>> Tras 6 meses de parón: 17'6cm BP - 15'7cm EG |----> Progresos Garvi
Kingd8808
72”
8” Bpel
5.75 Eg
Tiltal55
66”
Bpel = 6.9”
Eg = 4.8”
Gurks
Height: 76”
Pre-PE BPEL: 6.75”
Pre-PE MSEG: 5.875”
Pre-PE BEG: 6”
Starting Stats Jan 2019 - BPEL: 6.75", MSEG: 5.875"
Now - BPEL: 7.0625", MSEG: 6.25"
Last edited by Gurks : 08-26-2020 at . Reason: Typo
booper
Height:71in
Pre Pel:6in
Pre Peg:4in
drISlittle
Height: 68in
NBPEL: 6.7/6.8
BPEL: 7.2
Max Girth: 6.2, 6avg
ntanta
Dataset updated since the last time
Hello everyone!
This my first post! The only reason I joined this forum was this thread because it looked way interesting!
Have not started any PE exercises yet.. We will see how this goes.
I have updated the data-set (498 samples—forgive me if I have forgotten anything) and I have included also my stats!
Height: 71”
BPEL: 6.6”
MEG: 4.5”
As for the main analysis, the most interesting thing is that height is correlated indeed to penis length and penis length is closely correlated to penis girth (which is expected as well.)!
The weird thing is that the penile volume for sure does not follow a normal distribution at all..
Our largest member has a penile volume of 33.14 cubic inches with a mean value of 13.6 and an SD of almost 4 cubic inches. Basically, it comes out that this is almost 5 SD above the average value (99.9999% or 1 in 1000000 samples if this was normally distributed whereas the sample size is just 498) !
On the other hand as for the height: average comes out to be 70.78 with a mean value of 71 and an SD of 3.37.
Our largest BPEL out of 498 was 9” and our largest girth was 7.25” and no it did not belong to the same person :)
However, length comes out as strongly correlated with girth and height and the same goes for penile volume!
SOME INTERESTING FACTS
If you look at the charts it seems that the average penile length (BPEL) of people who are 62” tall is about 6.1” whereas for people who are 78” is 7”.
The same is true for girth: people who are 62” have a girth of 4.85” whereas people who are 78” have a girth of 5.4” .
The overall difference in terms of penile volume is also apparent if one looks into these categories (people who are 62” height have volume of about 12 cubic inches whereas people who are 78” have a volume of about 16.5”- or about 37.5% more volume!)
Also for scatter plots it seems that if you are over 25cubic inches in volume you are on the clear and can be considered by any standard large!
The analogy from the findings with height are: Having more than 8.5” BPEL is as rare as having 6.5” or more or being 77” tall or more. The equivalent with volume is being more than 25 cubic inches (8.1*6.25”).
In the same way there are some people a lot more than 77” tall, they are some people who more than 25 cubic inches.
I am just skeptical about the 33 cubic inches we found in our sample because such equivalent in height and according to our data-set would be about (70.78+5*3.37 rounded down to 87” or 221 cm). This seems odd according to our data-set (498) however, it does not affect the average size that much!!
Thank you for your time to read this long post!
Blackout13
Measurements
H: 76”
L: 6.5”
G: 4.875”
norwegian wood
H: 69
L: 6 - 6,2 before PE
G: 5,5
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.