Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

any theory's about finding out how much inner penis someone has?

12

I’m just saying what a Urologist told me, that’s all.

Originally Posted by RedZulu2003

I’m just saying what a Urologist told me, that’s all.

Nobody is questioning your judgement. But what Modesto et al are saying is that “inner penis” as we know it is not as big as the Urologist mentioned.


regards, mgus

Taped onto the dashboard of a car at a junkyard, I once found the following: "Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." The car was crashed.

Primary goal: To have an EQ above average (i.e. streetsmart, compassionate about life and happy) Secondary goal: to make an anagram of my signature denoting how I feel about my gains

Originally Posted by hobby

> Lig stretching might get you 1”, max. The rest comes from growing the shaft.

I wouldn’t call 1” the max. .25” to 1” might be typical, but the guys who have more length tied up from ligs will gain more from stretching them.

I formed this opinion after playing with the LOT Simulator. The most a person can gain by stripping the ligs from the top of the pubic symphysis to the bottom is about 1”. This assumes the front face of the pubic symphysis is about 1.5” long and is angled at 45-degrees. The gains realized, when measured with the shaft at 90-degrees to the body, is 1.5” times the cosine of 45-degrees, or about 1”. Someone might gain slightly more if their PS is angled closer to vertical, or somewhat less if it’s angled closer to horizontal.

The shaft is very strongly anchored to the bottom of the pubic symphysis by the subpubic arcuate ligament (not currently shown in the sim), so I doubt many (if any) have been successful at stretching the shaft fully away from the pubic symphysis. I also think that would have undesirable results (erection angle and stability).

I do think it’s possible to gain more than 1” from downward stretching, but this is because the shaft itself grows. Some of this may be inner penis growth.

I suppose it’s possible that the ligs may loosen and reattach further back along the shaft as the inner penis is pulled out. This kind of process would suggest that a whole lot of gains could be gotten by alternating downward and upward stretching—stretch down to loosen the ligs, then stretch up to pull out the inner penis and move the attachments back along the shaft, then repeat. But it’s really speculative to think that that really happens.

I was working on another idea, which you may have thought of also. An article I read awhile back said that the suspensory ligs actually embedded into the tunica. There is no abrupt transition between them. The longitudinal fibers of the ligs invest into and become part of the dorsal surface of the tunica.

This may suggest that stretching the ligs actually promotes growth of the shaft at the attachment points. The dorsal thickening is the strongest part of the tunica. Stressing it at the attachment point may somehow induce growth more effectively than at other locations. Again, this is just guessing, but it provides on explanation for how it could be possible for guys to gain multiple inches from downward stretching.


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

Just goes to show that urologists don’t know everything about the penis.

Originally Posted by ModestoMan
I formed this opinion after playing with the LOT Simulator. The most a person can gain by stripping the ligs from the top of the pubic symphysis to the bottom is about 1”. This assumes the front face of the pubic symphysis is about 1.5” long and is angled at 45-degrees. The gains realized, when measured with the shaft at 90-degrees to the body, is 1.5” times the cosine of 45-degrees, or about 1”. Someone might gain slightly more if their PS is angled closer to vertical, or somewhat less if it’s angled closer to horizontal.

Stripping? Are you suggesting that you believe the ligaments are torn away from the symphysis by hanging? I suspect there would be some pain involved if that were true. Stretching ligs I can understand and I do believe that happens. Stripping them from their attachment to the bone? No.

“Stripping” was a concept that Bib explained to me in an email exchange. It doesn’t exactly mean “torn away.” He suggested that the ligs bond the shaft tightly to the pubic symphysis. He thought that downward stretching stretched the fibers toward the top of the pubic symphysis more than those below. After a while, the fibers lower down would also stretch, and those toward the top would stretch further. Meanwhile, those toward the bottom would stay fairly tightly adhered. The overall effect is similar to stripping the ligs back (like peeling back a piece of duct tape), although this isn’t exactly what physically happens.

Short answer: Yes, you’re right. The ligs don’t strip, they stretch.

Taking this a step further, I’m not sure I really like this “stripping” idea. The anatomy drawings that I’ve seen show the shaft hanging down a considerable distance from the pubic symphysis (but also passing fairly close to its bottom surface). The duct tape analogy breaks down if the fibers have any appreciable length. I think I’ll stick with “stretching” from here on out.

Thanks!


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

Ah, semantics. Thanks for clearing that up.

@ModestoMan and Hobby

How do you explain that a lot of guys who are actually posting in this forum here made more than 1 inch length gain with lig work.

Top
12

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 PM.