Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Measuring.

Measuring.

I am just getting ready to start this and it seems like measuring is quite important, but nobody seems to measure volume. I mean, isn’t that the most accurate way? If your penis has more mass/volume, doesn’t that mean that it is feeling bigger inside your woman?

I guess my question is whether or not anyone has tried to measure the volume of the penis before and after a significant time doing PE? It seems relatively straight forward but since I’ve searched I think I’ve found everyone doing linear measurements mostly.

My idea is to use a hollow graduated cylinder, open at the top, (similar to a penis pump), get myself 100% hard, insert my penis, pour water in to just over the penis and to the next line, cap the cylinder, and invert the cylinder. If one were to measure the water left and minus the other measurement (when the penis was in and covered by water up to a line), one should be able to get an idea of milliliters displaced which is exactly transferable to cubic centimeters.

For example: You get hard, insert dick in, pour water in to 1000 ml and it covers the penis. You cap it off and invert it so as to not lose any water. You then measure the remaining water at 400 ml. Thus your cock displaced 600 ml or 600 cubic centimeters.

If you measure this way again later and your cock displaces more cubic centimeters, you know 100% sure that it’s getting bigger.

Seems like this would work. Any input?

While this may be a effective way of measuring volume it is not practical. I would not want to measure using water, simply because it is much more hassle than regular measurement of BPEL and EG. The community is used to these standard methods. Go ahead and measure like this if you want, for your own personal use. But on forums stick to the standard measurements. Measuring BPEL via this method would also be complicated, fiddly and time consuming. Measuring using a ruler/tape is more than enough to accurately measure to the nearest mm. I would say allot more so than your method.


Start January 2011 - NBPEL 7.1, BPEL 7.3, EG 5.5, FL ~4.5 FG ~4.5

AIM Long term - NBPEL 8 BPEL 8.3 EG 6 FL 6 FG 5

As you can see on the PE Data site, when you put your measurements in, it does give you an erect volume measurement.

My stats for example;
/pedata/data.ph … e=kingdingaling


Dec \'23 -> Feb\'24 17.5cm -> 18.5cm BPEL / 12.7cm -> 13.1 MSEG / 18.5cm -> 18.9cm BPFSL (measuring in mm for accuracy)

My First Real Attempt:

2006 Start: 6.25" BPEL and 5" EG - 2012 7.625" BPEL / 4.875" EG / 8.063" BPFSL. (All manual routine)

I’m not saying that this would be a daily or monthly thing. It would certainly be more time consuming than necessary if done too often. Perhaps every 3 or 4 months, maybe even 6 would work. I would continue using my tape measure for regular measurements.

My problem with just using an equation is that I don’t know of anyone with a perfectly cylindrical penis. I know mine tapers with the base being a LOT thicker than the head.

I will eventually give the idea a try and, hopefully=), be able to show an exact gain in penile mass.

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Read - The Second PE Survey -- A Thunder's Place group projectremekPenis Enlargement32706-02-2017 01:29 AM
Why measuring oftenOdenPenis Enlargement602-09-2011 05:28 PM
- Girth Measuring Device [with pics]olaf christPenis Enlargement3101-12-2010 11:25 PM
Parallax error on measuring lengthcervixhunterPenis Enlargement Basics707-22-2009 04:19 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM.