Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

What lends more to the appearance of size

◀ 12

Originally Posted by Pillars

Ofcourse a combination of both but mostly girth.

No it’s the combination of length girth AND width :)

Originally Posted by devilknight666
Very true. But, you must remember, in modern culture there can be no ” winners” and no “losers”. All must be equal so that everyone gets a good self esteem. Hence the no student left behind program. Thus, with the largest number of people over average being in the 7” range, and the largest number of people under average being in the 5” range, they choose an “average” range that guarantees the greatest number of people will feel neither better nor worse than their neighbor. No kudos if you are better than average, but also no bad feelings if you are less. It is a part of our modern ” seek mediocrity” philosophy.

Of course, the culture that seeks mediocrity soon finds it.

Ouch, that’s a pessimistic view. Plus they’re only this way on penis size because there can’t be that greater accuracy since not THAT many valid studies have been done on the subject.

Oh and I think length is more important to being classified as big in society. That is why people talk about penis length not girth, even females mostly do. Although girth does equate to a greater volume so I guess that is more important.

Visually, I think length has more impact than girth; and a downward curve (which I don’t have) also helps.

Which would look bigger, a penis which is 5” long but 5.5” in circumference, or one which is 4.5” in circumference but 7” long?

The 7 incher is still smaller by volume, but I’m betting that most people would swear that it’s bigger.

*You're in the right place – all the information you could ever need about PE is only a forum search away!*

Take your time, pick a simple routine you can stick to, and be consistent in your efforts. Patience is the key.

Socially speaking, it’s definitely length. As for pleasure-ability, I’m sure length matters to a degree but girth is AT LEAST as important.

2/11/11: 7.75" BPEL, 6" BSEG, 5.5" MSEG

6/4/11: 8.4" BPEL, 6.375" BSEG, 5.8" MSEG

Just started again, another new measurement coming soon; I'm pretty close to that June '11 though.

Originally Posted by Dicko7X5
Tiny balls.

:D

No doubt. I have big nuts, and I’m fairly long (just over seven) and thick (over six). Having huge nuts offsets both of them. My wife loves them, but everything being proportional means my wang doesn’t look as big as it is.

Originally Posted by fatman7_6
No doubt. I have big nuts, and I’m fairly long (just over seven) and thick (over six). Having huge nuts offsets both of them. My wife loves them, but everything being proportional means my wang doesn’t look as big as it is.

I’m in the same situation myself. I’ve noticed that if I unzip my pants and pull my member out then it looks much larger than when I’m naked.

Originally Posted by redworm
I’m in the same situation myself. I’ve noticed that if I unzip my pants and pull my member out then it looks much larger than when I’m naked.

Mine looks best inside some square cut trunks or similar. Ridiculous bulge. It’s all downhill after that. :(

Top
◀ 12

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 PM.