Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Secondary sexual charasteristics and penis size

123

Everything else is bigger on a tall guy, so why wouldn’t the dick also be bigger?

It makes perfect sense to me.


:buttrock: The Peter Dick method :buttrock:

Then, BPEL:7.500"x5.500"

Now, BPEL:8.375"X6.750"

This data shows significant relationship between erect length and height:
Http://www.sizesurvey.com/result.html

The survey instructions say to measure bone-pressed, so I’ll assume that the length data is mostly BPEL.

Here is a link to a Brittish study reported by the BBC that proves penis size is not linked to shoe size.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2292143.stm

This Greek Study says the only body measurement that is correlated with penis size is the index finger.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/about267.html

The sizesurvey results cannot be relied upon as strongly because it’s all self reported. So people measuring incorrectly, inconsistently and just plain old lying cause the data to be a bit dodgy. You can’t rely on such a survey as much as an independent proffesional survey…


Cheers, G Started at 6 x 4.5 - Jan 05 Current 7.1 x 5.1 Goal 8 x 6

King_G,

I don’t see any charts. The press can’t be trusted to quote accurately. I saw a newspaper headline that said the urologist said no correlation, but what he actually said was not much of one. He was likely talking about the average, but no charts were provided, and the newscasters apparently didn’t think it worth asking for one, as they dropped the …not much… for the headlines. Also, those articles’ studies you linked were very small, and the numbers could be all over the place. They were likely just looking for an average, which is very close in the poll here. With that close of an average a small sampling would quite possibly not show much up, if anything. But the outliner numbers are where the correlation appears best. The poll here produces correlations that have upward and downward slopes. I’ll certainly trust the guys here over those vague, no charted, press reported, small samplings.


Last edited by beenthere : 01-14-2006 at .

Originally Posted by King_G

So people measuring incorrectly, inconsistently and just plain old lying cause the data to be a bit dodgy. You can’t rely on such a survey…

“Incorrectly, inconsistently”, does not compute - that doesn’t explain the defined correlations in the poll here. Unless you are trying to say the taller the guy the less likely he knows how to measure correctly.

“Plain old lying” would compute if the taller the guy the more prone to lie he is. Why would guys come to Thunders and be serious about measuring their starting points and growth, and choose to lie on that poll? There can be a few liars on the forum, history here proves that, but by and large it doesn’t make sense to think it’s a fairly common theme here amongst the tall guys stating extra size.

Sorry, I don’t see the “proof” you stated.

Top
123

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.