Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Does the Golden Ratio hold the Ideal Penis Size?

Interesting.


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

I would agree with the comments of howardson that you can’t compare length to girth in terms of the golden ratio. This would be comparing apples to oranges and not valid. So does length and girth relate to some other body part e.g. Feet, hands or ring finger. Researchers have discovered a relationship between penis length and the ratio of your ring finger to middle finger. It appears that at birth if you received more testosterone in your body than normal that the difference between the two fingers is greater and your likely to have a larger penis. Some speculate that this is way the wedding ring is placed on this the ring finger by your spouse. Maybe that’s why women tend to check out a man’s ring finger!

If I should say anything about why some of you consider the girth ratios too big is that you have to admit a man’s ego has a lot to do with him wanting to have an oversized penis. Once you start pushing over the limits of 6” mseg, blowjobs soon become a thing of the past.

Of course there will always be those that love the extremes, like girls that only like guys with micropenises, or only like guys that have 12 inch monsters, but for most women to see a golden ratio proportioned penis that isn’t too big or small would most likely be turned on by it as opposed to thinking it is unimpressive, or too scary and big to fuck.

Of course you can always try to get a realllllly short and fat dick and try to make it 5” long with 3”wide, so your penis looks like a golden rectangle. You can also focus on trying to make the shaft look like a golden rectangle shape as if viewing from one side to still have the few extra inches from the head, with an overall longer appearance in the long run!

There are many ways to consider the ratio, but I believe the ones I listed in the above post should be pretty accurate imho, because they are long enough to excite, and not thick enough to choke or tear a girl, just 100% love machine.


Pre-PE: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG-------> Current Stats: 8" BPEL x 5.25" EG-------> Goal: 9" BPEL x 6.5" EG - 7" BG

Doki-Doki LOLI POP CHAN! Sugoi Desu~~~

You are all off the point. The golden ratio 1.618… is the height vs. NBPEL ratio actually!


Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

No. There is no ideal. Why do people keep bringing this up? I have slept with quite a few women and I can tell you that each of them required a different size that they would consider ideal.


Originally Posted by sparkyx
Mr B. Dog finds that if he whacks his dick with a hammer, it turns purple, and shrinks up for a week.

Originally Posted by Smallja
Mary was a dirty slut and that's why she got pregnant. She loved God's giant, holy penis.

-Smallja

Originally Posted by steelrod

There are many ways to consider the ratio, but I believe the ones I listed in the above post should be pretty accurate imho, because they are long enough to excite, and not thick enough to choke or tear a girl, just 100% love machine.

Not thick enough to choke or tear a girl… But enough to tickle her. :) Sorry, but 4.3” girth on 7” penis is way out of proportion. According to you, average girth of 5” needs 8.1” of length to be proportional. That’s skinny, not proportional.


Start • 5.94''x4.92''

Now • 6.50''x4.96''

Goal • 7.00''x5.75''

The golden ratio was a two dimensional relationship between height and width.

The human penis would have to be four inches wide at six inches long to satisfy that requirement.

And the girth would be over 12 inches.

I’m pretty sure there is an ideal range. Just not the golden ratio. I think a penis 6” BPEL x 7” girth would look strange. A dick 9” BPEL x 5” girth would equally look strange. I think there’s a range and most girls would roughly have similar ratio dick preferences (give or take), just like they and we do for leg length/height.

My guess is a 6 x 5 ratio is very likely very close to the ideal because that’s the one nature seems to have preferred and most women and guys would think looks the most normal (from an aesthetics perspective).


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

I believe you must consider lengths within features of any object under consideration. There are examples in Greek columns where the design takes into consideration the length between the column base and the echaenus rings (three rings on the column just below the cap)to the width between columns or other relationships. The column cap is left out of it. Column capitals are at different heights. “Doric” rather low, “Ionic Medium Height and “Corinthian” tall. My point being, if you consider omitting the GLANS and measure from base to coronal ridge I would bet the golden ratio will work perfectly. Visually you measure something of a type and relate it proportionately to something else of visual difference or of like kind. There might be aworkable perfect relationship of glans to shaft using one of the math derivitives of the golden mean ie. 2.618, 3.618 etc.
Howardson

P S: Scholars have thought that the aesthetic origin of the rings are the natural folds below the glans of the uncut penis when retracted!

Howardson’s comments are fascinating and may explain why I was always drawn the the design of Greek columns as a youngster, they just appealed to me and now I know why! It would be nice to have a penis as proportionate as those of a “Corinthian” column e.g. Tall and strong. They represent strength, power and elegance something most men desire for their own penis.

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_order

The golden penis ration is more likely to be the square root of 1.618… (=1.272…) imho :) .


"You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts."

Originally Posted by Krowax

The golden penis ration is more likely to be the square root of 1.618… (=1.272…) imho :) .

That makes much more sense.


Start • 5.94''x4.92''

Now • 6.50''x4.96''

Goal • 7.00''x5.75''

Originally Posted by howardson
I believe you must consider lengths within features of any object under consideration. There are examples in Greek columns where the design takes into consideration the length between the column base and the echaenus rings (three rings on the column just below the cap)to the width between columns or other relationships. The column cap is left out of it. Column capitals are at different heights. “Doric” rather low, “Ionic Medium Height and “Corinthian” tall. My point being, if you consider omitting the GLANS and measure from base to coronal ridge I would bet the golden ratio will work perfectly. Visually you measure something of a type and relate it proportionately to something else of visual difference or of like kind. There might be aworkable perfect relationship of glans to shaft using one of the math derivitives of the golden mean ie. 2.618, 3.618 etc.
Howardson

P S: Scholars have thought that the aesthetic origin of the rings are the natural folds below the glans of the uncut penis when retracted!

I mentioned this in my other post. Basing the shape off of the rectangle and omitting the glans would allow you to have a thicker penis and still be long, more of the proportion that we here are going for.

Also what a great comparison to a column to a penis. The architecture in Ancient Greece is highly aware of the golden ratio especially in columns, so building a golden ratio penis to make a golden ratio greek column…. HMMMM THAT IS PRETTY F*CKING EPIC! :D

I agree if you have a 7” x4.3, then that would be really thin, but maybe I approached this wrong to begin with.

I still think the golden ratio idea is correct, but now that we have this column deal, I think that is where the real answer is, excluding the glans and only taking in the shape of the shaft for one section of the rectangle.

Can anyone make a list of what the sizes would be like then using a golden ratio formula for length and girth?
Make sure you are actually using the golden ratio in it somehow, otherwise you are just going off topic. :)


Pre-PE: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG-------> Current Stats: 8" BPEL x 5.25" EG-------> Goal: 9" BPEL x 6.5" EG - 7" BG

Doki-Doki LOLI POP CHAN! Sugoi Desu~~~


Last edited by steelrod : 09-28-2010 at .

Originally Posted by steelrod

I would assume that most of the most praised members on TPF are close to these type of proportions? Lets see how many people to post their measurements currently!

Hard
My ratio is 1.16 (L to G ratio)

Soft
It’s 1.42 (G to L ratio)

That’s assuming NBP


[9/2010] 7*6 NBPEL/8*6 BPEL pic's Not PEing anymore. (as of Nov '10)

[12/2011] 7.37" NBPEL * 6.4"

[1/2013] Current stats:7.37 NBPEL * 6.5.

While the Golden Ratio 0.618 (or it’s inverse 0.382) clearly does not define the aesthetic penis, the derivative Fibonacci ratio 0.236 (and it’s inverse 0.764) clearly comes very close, if not nailing it. The ideal Fibonacci penis could very well be this fractal proportion of the golden ratio.

For you number nerds, divide a selected Fibonacci number below by the third one to it’s right, and you get the 0.236 (or the inverted derivative 1-0.236=0.764) ratio.
{1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, .. } Examples: 13/55, 21/89. 34/144, etc.

Now multiply your favored length by 0.764 to get the girth, or divide your favored girth by 0.764 to get the length. Go to http://www.thevisualiser.net/newboy.php and try it out by comparing “your” penis size of 5” girth x 6.5” length (5/6.54 = 0.764) to any of their average stats. It’s a pretty tough ratio to beat, IMHO.


Last edited by groovetube : 10-24-2010 at .
Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 AM.