Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Re: Girth

1234

Guys you are forgetting about the kegel variable, any woman can go tight with a lot of kegel, so she can have 100, 200 or 300 pounds, with a lot of kegel she can get tight.

And FF you are totally right about the wide thing, the changeable range of the girth it’s much less than lenght, so like Mr. H has already said a simply (not for me) “0.5 can make great difference.

Originally Posted by Mr. Happy
Actually, there was one study that showed a slight correlation between hand size and penis size. It’s posted here somewhere, maybe Para-Goomba’s thread. I can’t remember now.

I haven’t seen one that supported such a correlation with regard to height.

Maybe to you. I don’t buy it.

Some of the tightest women I’ve been with were very wide hipped. The one woman I’ve actually felt lost in was very skinny and narrow hipped. I don’t think there is a reliable predictor there.

Skinny girl - cow vag……you guys haven’t heard that saying?

LOL

06/21/07 NBP = 7.75(tape) FSL = 7.875 EG = 5.00 Volume= 15.42

09/13/07 NBP = 8.375 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.38 Volume = 19.29 (+25%)

12/26/07 NBP = 8.625 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.50 Volume = 20.82 (+35%)

Originally Posted by Mr. Happy
Actually, there was one study that showed a slight correlation between hand size and penis size. It’s posted here somewhere, maybe Para-Goomba’s thread. I can’t remember now.

I haven’t seen one that supported such a correlation with regard to height.

Height vs. Length vs. Girth Project
Useful for demonstrating the overall relationship in detailed fashion and while not weak it is only on the mild side.

Useful for demonstrating the overall relationship and while it is not weak it is only on the mild side. What stands out in this poll (that the link above doesn’t concentrate on) is that the outliners show a significant change in percentages (correlation). See my post #64. It’s more than mild, more of a moderate level.

Last edited by beenthere : 11-10-2007 at .

Oh, I am sure this discussion has been had before. At least 100 times. And all over the place. This shit is getting as bad as the masturbation question.

This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

Thunder,

You’re as right as can be. You’re not a man of many words, but when you say something it’s usually right on the money. You’re a master at summing things up with strong accuracy, and I’m not kissing your ass because you own the place (hell, I don’t think I’ve ever complemented you before), it’s something anyone that has been here long enough should come to realise about you. Newcomers sometimes argue with you, not realising you don’t say something without good reason. I’m no doubt the worst one about giving this shit about correlations fuel. My problem is I’ve always been into statistics (I would sit in study hall in the 7th grade and try to invent new ways to do math and actually came up with something) and I’m into this subject stuff and then when I see posts such as in this thread that I know is inaccurate information I find it hard to turn away despite my being so burned out on it. Even Mr. Happy’s reference to the hand size is inaccurate and I know it. It’s the index finger and it was found to have a strong correlation, not weak (the result could be called into question, somewhat at least, because of the limited number of guys who were involved). I realise my type posts on size and correlation don’t help insecure guys, and don’t really further PE (though I think my poll on age vs gains is insightful in a way), but then again all this downplaying by some members who are throwing up numbers and correlations into the thin air is not good soild information. I’m certainly not pinpointing Mr. Happy, it’s all over the place. Time for me to finally come to grips with the fact that I can’t run all over the place trying to put out fires, so to speak.

Last edited by beenthere : 11-10-2007 at .

I don’t blame you for getting sucked in beenthere. And decent discussion on these surveys is a good thing. It is just every couple of days lately we get a new thread by some new guy and we are off to the races, yet again. My above post wasn’t directed at you, just a comment on the current situation.

Any ideas how we can conglomerate the lot?

This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

Thunder,

A new link or two could be placed in the Newbie/Read This First thread. I don’t believe it’s possible to arrive at an agreement on much of this, so from all the threads link a good one in which just about every viewpoint has been posted concerning the various size related topics constantly repeating. Best I can think of.

This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

This link is a recent discussion that contains many posts and various viewpoints concerning women and penis size. It seems overall quite reasonable. Btw, after what I said earlier it’s only fair I mention Mr. Happy has some really outstanding posts in it putting things in perspective and just so happened to play a big role in my choosing the thread.

7x6 Large or what?

Oh, I forgot to mention that it’s not a thread about correlations. I checked the newbie questions from the past few weeks and it appears to me that correlation is not coming up (other than this thread), I think. ‘Is this size big enough’ type questions obviously are though, and I recalled you recently mentioned in another thread - What is the Right Size as Judged by the Experts - there being many size threads (“Yeah we have been asshole deep in these size threads lately. I’ll pass on a Size Forum though.”), so I chose a thread that I thought might go the furthest towards helping out.

Last edited by beenthere : 11-11-2007 at .

Thanks beenthere.

This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

1234

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.