Penimaster Math REBORN

‘Allo.

Came across this post a while ago, and it’s a dead post, but it holds some good information..

Penimaster Math (p. 5)

Basic gist is “this is a mathematics formula to find an accurate prediction of the amount of growth from using an extender.” Like I said, it was a really good post, but not quite what I was looking for.

Now, I looked in the threads and didn’t find anything about finding the rate of growth, as in: this many hours equals X growth.

That is a simple representation of what I would like to know.. Though, taking into account other things such as tension, bar length, etc., would have been nice to add also, and would produce more on-point results.

Any mathemagicians in the ranks? Maybe I missed something in the OP? I’m not strong on math, so let me know if I did make a mistake.

<3

Well its basically impossible to say that x amount of hours at x amount tension would result in x amount of gains because its different for each person. Nobody heals at the same rate and nobody gains at the same rate. I’m a fast gainer. And if I say 4 hours at x tension results in 1,5 inches of gains in a month, and someone reads it, tries it and gains 0.3 inches in a month, then he will think PE is not for him or whatever. So it will be pretty irresponsible. You get fast gainers and slow gainers. That’s just how thing are in PE.

Hmm. I see what you mean, and that was something I did think of, but I was thinking about basing it on a mean.. But that might be a bad idea. Like I said, I am not strong in maths, but I do understand concepts, so what you brought up is not lost on me. :)

I’m also a fast gainer, apparently. So I get that what works on people like us, wouldn’t go for someone who gains slowly.

This may just have to become a closed post and buried.

Well my maths isn’t bad. Did well enough to qualify to study engineering at university. (What a fool I was) But I won’t do something like that as it might just discourage slow gainers to pursue PE, and that’s why I say its irresponsible.