Just wondering about body proportions.

Index finger - 3.75

Thumb - 3 7/8”

Height 6 feet

Weight 170

Pre PE NBPEL 5.1

My hands are quite narrow at around 3.75” across, which puts them more in the female average…

So far there isn’t any relations between the size of the hands and penis.

Maybe we can add shoe size as well. I am a size 10, I also noticed these days teens wear big shoes, I want to see if there are any relations between the shoe size and penis.

If I remember correctly from statistics you need a sample size of at least 30 people to be statistically significant.

My shoe size is 10.5 U.S.

Yup. The perfect shaped titty. ;)

Why NBP?

Wny not BP— why is ‘visibility’ relevant to actual start EL?

Also, why must it be Erect? That would be a function of size potential less any potential ED or lack of erectile capacity/ interest—- wouldn’t a BP Flaccid Stretched Length measurement be more useful to gauge potential genetic physiological penis size correlations?

But then as I’m a proponent of BPFSL as primary indicator of pure length increase I’m biased ;)

Well because the visibility is what women usually visually measure, mostly when it’s erect.

So this isn’t about any actual correlation between all measurements but what someone might see as correlations?

A fat guy with an inch of fat pad has a bigger dick than it looks, so his actual proportions are different from his visual— makes the idea of an actual correlation pretty useless, no?

That’s what I was trying to say a few posts back, BP is what should be used.