Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Why doctors don't accept pumping as an effective penis enlargement

12

Why doctors don't accept pumping as an effective penis enlargement

I’m wondering why doctors say this method doesn’t work for penis enlargement but is used just to achieve erections or to improve vascular health in people with some disease’s like diabetes.

I don’t know if it work or not but a lot of people in the forum say the results in enlargement are real and permanent specially in girth.So I can’t understand why doctors will not accept there are no reason.

Some doctors will tell their patients that enlargement may occur as a side-effect when using a pump for ED. Such enlargement is usually temporary, though… You have to stick a pretty serious and strict regimen, as we PEers do, to see “permanent” gains.


Please :donatecar to Thunder's Place to keep it running.

Lack of valid scientific studies would be my guess.

Originally Posted by Para-Goomba
Some doctors will tell their patients that enlargement may occur as a side-effect when using a pump for ED. Such enlargement is usually temporary, though… You have to stick a pretty serious and strict regimen, as we PEers do, to see “permanent” gains.

And, of course, the regimen we follow for PE is different than the one studied and recommended for temporary remediation of ED, or to help vascular status compromised from diabetes, or post-prostate surgery side effects.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.


Last edited by Lampwick : 12-06-2009 at .

Because there are no scientific studies that examine this technique in the context of penis enlargement?

That would be my guess.

That would be my guess too. :)


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

The trouble, is that Doctors are mainly interested in healing injuries and illnesses. Since PE is more of a pastime ,such as sport They only become involved when injury occurs.

So as long as your dick is functioning it’s more a case of ‘If it ain’t broke - Don’t mend it!

PE then, tends to be rather more in the Sports gains field, than the medical field.

Rather like weight lifting at home. (Except you cant really brag about it at work :D )


Don't be a lurker left out in the cold. :lurk: Join the happy band of donors!

Psst! The link is at the bottom of the page :bigwink:

On a related topic as I was searching for that BMJ graph I found this:

BMJ 2005; 330 : 280 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7486.280 (Published 3 February 2005)
Q&A

Penis enlargement

Question
Can a man increase the size of his penis?

Frank Martin, student

Answer
I presume you are asking about increasing the size of the erect phallus rather than asking about erectile dysfunction.

It is possible to surgically increase the size of an erect (and flaccid, for that matter) penis, but it should not be undertaken lightly, as it is by no means guaranteed to produce the result one might be hoping for.

Length can be added by division of the penile suspensory ligament that tethers the penis to the pubic arch. This sounds like a simple solution, but remember the ligament was there for a reason. Dividing it will allow the penis to fall away from the pubis, giving some length (a couple of centimetres), but at a loss of the normal “angle” at erection. Also, this does not lengthen the skin, and so the peripenile pubic skin is often pulled onto the shaft of the penis, resulting in pubic hair growing from the penile shaft.

Another surgical technique is “enhancement” of penile girth by the injection of harvested adipose tissue (fat) from elsewhere. This has significant risks of resulting in uneven, lumpy appearance, and patient satisfaction is not assured.

What is important to remember is that there is wide natural variation in penis size, as in height, weight, and many other human physical characteristics. Thus, what may seem small is probably normal. Surgery is fraught with uncertainties about results, and, like other forms of medically “unnecessary” cosmetic surgery, people often have unrealistic expectations and are disappointed as a result.

And don’t believe any advertisements found in the back of top shelf publications or try any “DIY” methods. They don’t work. I have spent the odd night in accident and emergency trying to undo these “efforts”; it is embarrassing for the patient, and the penis is never larger, once the pain and swelling have subsided.

John F Bolton, clinical fellow in urology

Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol

bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/qa-display/short/bmj_el;56386


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by hothardone
Because there are no scientific studies that examine this technique in the context of penis enlargement?

That would be my guess.

Pumping study


Starting Stats - 5.5 NBPEL x 5.6 EG

Current Stats - 5.7 NBPEL x 6.2 EG

Goal - 7 x 6 (with hopefully a large flaccid hang)

Remember though, in that pumping study there was an increase in “stretched penile length measurement”. To my knowledge, there aren’t many (if any studies) that have shown erect gains although quite a few extender studies and pumping studies suggest increased stretched length. How many guys here reported gains in stretched length without erect gains? However, one extender study did suggest glans (head) gains.


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Originally Posted by bohm
How many guys here reported gains in stretched length without erect gains?

Is that common?


Starting Stats - 5.5 NBPEL x 5.6 EG

Current Stats - 5.7 NBPEL x 6.2 EG

Goal - 7 x 6 (with hopefully a large flaccid hang)

Don’t know but it’s a very important question, in my opinion. Interestingly, the andropenis guys claim that there is no way for one to gain erect length gains until stretched length gains are made first. After a while of stretched length gains, erect gains will follow.


Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

I don’t think doctors accept anything except surgery as an effective PE method.

Results are too varied and unpredictable, it is a veritable box of chocolate. Science seeks replication or a reproducible outcome.

Doctor’s don’t acknowledge any form of PE other than expensive surgery as viable because if they did then no man anywhere would get anything done except for growing a massive wang (whereas now the expense and uncertainty of the results puts most guys off). On the one hand that would give women yet another reason to get rid of the male gender entirely, as they’d be doing everything with no work from the male population, but on the other hand if they did get rid of us they’d also be disposing of our, by then, massive wangs, which I’m sure they’d be getting much enjoyment out of!


Start: 22 Mar 04: 6.5" BPEL x 4.6" EG & 6" head. As at: 1 Jan 05: 7.5" BPEL x 4.8-4.9" EG & 6.3" head.

Re-re-start!: 6 Feb 17: 6.9" BPEL x 4.9" EG & 5.5" head. As of: 23 Feb 17: 7.0" BPEL x 5.0" EG & 6.0" head.

Ideal: ASAP: 8+" BPEL x 5.5+" EG & 6.5+" head But will continue if the going is good!!

Originally Posted by raybbaby

I don’t think doctors accept anything except surgery as an effective PE method.

Except the ones affiliated with extender manufacturers.


11/2009: 6.25 NBPEL/6.5 BPEL, 4.7 MEG/4.95 Base EG

current: 6.7 NBPEL / 7.0 BPEL, 4.95 MEG/5.2 Base EG

Top
12
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Read - The Second PE Survey -- A Thunder's Place group projectremekPenis Enlargement32706-02-2017 01:29 AM
The PE Survey results!remekPenis Enlargement16105-19-2017 12:29 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31 AM.