Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

"Packing the Tube"

"Packing the Tube"

I do not pack my tube at all - at the base there is packing I suppose but than midshaft and onwards, not even close since I have a tree trunk dick. My question is - is girth hit harder when the tube is “packed” for some reason? Has this been people’s empirical experience? Is there a lot to gain even when the tube is not really being packed at all? I think my cylinder size is correct because my base girth matches it well.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

By “tree trunk”, I take it that you mean tapered - larger base girth, and progressively smaller to the tip?

As long as you’re packing at the base to get a good seal, you’re good to go. Over time, you should see yourself packing more and more of the base, and expanding out from there to the tip.

I don’t think that ‘packing’ the cylinder is necessary for growth. It is at least arguable that packing the cylinder means there is no more room for expansion, and thus it represents a limiting factor to growth where you’re packing. Where you’re not ‘packed’, you still have room to expand.

Think about the sun tea jar pumpers. It takes a long time to fill a sun tea jar with pumped dick and balls, but I haven’t heard anyone say that they cannot grow at all as a result.

Or, on a smaller scale, consider the ‘full package’ pumpers, with 3 - 4 inch diameter cylinders. It takes a long time to pack one of those, but men do experience growth during the process.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Maybe you will get something out of this old thread I started:

Packing a cylinder - HOW?

I got some great advice from the vets. Lamp and gprent agree on packing not being necessary for growth. And indeed that has been true for me. I’ve never packed, but I did grow.

As to packing, my attempts at packing really weren’t that “fun” or “productive” — I just ended up feeling fatigued and overpumped and needing to take a day or two off to recover. With that hideous doughnut thing. And black spots on my glans.

Yuck


Last edited by sta-kool : 11-23-2009 at .

I think packing is nothing more then a visual turn on. There is no difference between expanding to 6.5” girth in a 2” tube and being packed or expanding to 6.5” girth in a 2.25” tube and just looking great.

As a matter of fact, spending too much time in the packed state can lead to significant bad results including those nasty head blisters.

Although I could pack my 2” cylinder, my favorite tube to use is my 2.25”.


The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

On the “tree trunk” thing, ME TOO!

I was just thinking tonight that I would like to figure out a way to target the top third of my unit with jelqing. Maybe some sadsak heads or something.

I should note that my taper is much more gradual than from before I started PE. Used to be very sharp from circ scar to the bottom the the glans. More subtle now, I credit pumping with that.

Originally Posted by sta-kool
On the “tree trunk” thing, ME TOO!

I was just thinking tonight that I would like to figure out a way to target the top third of my unit with jelqing. Maybe some sadsak heads or something.

I should note that my taper is much more gradual than from before I started PE. Used to be very sharp from circ scar to the bottom the the glans. More subtle now, I credit pumping with that.

My tree trunk is ridiculous. 6.25” on a good day at the very base…my head sucks, it’s like 4.6. But the shaft right below the head is like 5.0-5.1. For the most part the MSEG is around 5.25”.

Anyway, I wonder if all tree trunks are like mine, with pretty equal width all throughout and only the side view showing the tapering.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

I did a post on the advantages of base girth and the ‘tree trunk’ shape a couple of years ago:

Lampwick - Don’t want any more girth, just length

Do you want to look at it or do you want to use it?

There is a significant advantage to having a smaller glans and a larger base girth. Insertion is easier, and you can stretch things out more or less simply by controlling how deeply you’re inserted. This has a lot to do with pleasure and comfort level. You get more “aaaaah”s and fewer “ow!”s.

Progressive stretching as you go deeper can be a very good thing for both of you, and you can have that with a smaller glans and a larger base.

My tapering is more apparent in side view that top view.

For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Originally Posted by sta-kool
As to packing, my attempts at packing really weren’t that “fun” or “productive” — I just ended up feeling fatigued and overpumped and needing to take a day or two off to recover. With that hideous doughnut thing. And black spots on my glans.

Originally Posted by sta-kool
On the “tree trunk” thing, ME TOO!

I was just thinking tonight that I would like to figure out a way to target the top third of my unit with jelqing. Maybe some sadsak heads or something.

I should note that my taper is much more gradual than from before I started PE. Used to be very sharp from circ scar to the bottom the the glans. More subtle now, I credit pumping with that.

Sta:

I’m sorry, man. I must have missed the part about the black spots on your glans.

Together with a ‘tree trunk’ shaped dick, that could mean Tar Spot Disease:

http://plantclinic.cornell.edu/Fact…ot/tarspots.htm

If it recurs, consult an arborist.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
"Packing the tube" questionJimmy2284Penis Pumps2602-16-2009 02:39 AM
A different "Staying Hard in the Tube" questionbiggerjohnsonPenis Pumps407-14-2006 01:26 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:35 PM.