Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Hang Without Wrap?

I am using one of the device which only sucks my penis shaft (head) after that I hang 5lbs for 2 hours with out any sets. Is this ok? Or do I need to wrap it and hang weights?

Pictures of a BIB starter with padding removed.

Several people over the years have asked if it’s possible to make xeno’s mods using a BIB starter by removing the padding, including myself. Well I had an old starter circa 2013 lying around unused, and the gel padding gets slimey as the years go by, so I cut it all out.

As shown, there are some structural cavities and weaknesses in the BIB starter’s “gel skeleton” whereas the BIB HC is more solid. A couple points on the fingers might need to be sanded down as well. Overall though, I think it could be modified successfully to xeno’s recommendations.

20180922_151245.webp
(180.6 KB, 75 views)
20180922_151358.webp
(309.8 KB, 55 views)
20180922_151410.webp
(295.2 KB, 60 views)

Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
Pictures of a BIB starter with padding removed.

Several people over the years have asked if it’s possible to make xeno’s mods using a BIB starter by removing the padding, including myself. Well I had an old starter circa 2013 lying around unused, and the gel padding gets slimey as the years go by, so I cut it all out.

As shown, there are some structural cavities and weaknesses in the BIB starter’s “gel skeleton” whereas the BIB HC is more solid. A couple points on the fingers might need to be sanded down as well. Overall though, I think it could be modified successfully to xeno’s recommendations.

For the record, I tried with the Bib starter and couldn’t make it work. I’m ordering a Bib hardcore and will try that one and report back. Could be that the skeleton type ribs are what make it uncomfortable compared with the Hardcore.


Start: 6" BPEL x 5" EG (mid)

Current: 7.5" BPEL x 5.98" EG (average distal/mid/base shaft)

Goal: 8" BPEL x 6.5" EG (whole shaft)

Xeno thanks for these posts. Golden!

Originally Posted by xenolith
No, they’re super far apart.. See photo. See the front bolt? It’s got a stop-nut interior to the BIB to keep the front portion of the BIB from closing when I torque down the top wingnut (and I torque it down HARD).it keeps the front of the BIB open and blood flowing well through the CS.that’s how the meditation and napping can happen. Rear bolt is gone, I just use a zip-tie and let the rear compression do whatever it wants to in response to tightening of the top wingnut. The ONLY point of compression is at the top wingnut bolt of the BIB, although there is some distributed compression that falls off in magnitude away from that point.
Xeno

Originally Posted by xenolith
Yes, that’s exactly what I did; frankly, I could almost do without any connection at the rear position at all.almost. The purpose of the zip-tie connection at the rear position is to provide a minimum of compression at that position so as to allow for maximum blood flow through the CC and the lower portions of the CSs. So, you’re right, it’s not able to fully grip.that’s the intent! Virtually ALL of the gripping takes place at the top bolt; it’s important that it’s understood that I’ve hung with over 100 lbs many times with this exact hanger configured exactly as shown in the photos below.. Hopefully they help. Point is, that top connection alone is perfectly capable of providing adequate closure of the BIB and a firm attachment to the penis; thereby freeing up the lower portion of the BIB to only loosely grip the penis, thus allowing for excellent blood flow in all three blood borne oxygen dependent chambers and therefore comfortable, long hanging sessions.

Originally Posted by xenolith
Sitting; BTC, SD and my personal favorite, “the swami”.BTC with legs crossed on the desk in front of me. Pressure is focused at 11 o’clock and 1 o’clock. No blood buildup in glans.. That happens as a result of compression of the CS.. As I’ve tried very hard to make clear, the configuration that I use (see underside of BIB photo) doesn’t compress the CS at all, it ONLY compresses the top of the CCs. I can hang indefinitely with this configuration.60 -90 minutes is typical. Like I said, I meditate while hanging, sometimes nap too.

Xeno

Originally Posted by xenolith
Fellas, there’s a physical reality that needs to be understood: blood is trapped in the glans when the cavernosum spongiosum (CS) is constricted because it is the CS that supplies delivery and removal, in other words, exchange, of blood to the glans. It is only when exchange of blood into and out of the glans is restricted that pain is experienced in the glans. With the BIB, the lower bolts serve to constrict the CS when their respective wingnuts are tightened; when tightened in accordance with common practice, restriction of blood exchange to the glans occurs, and therefore pain in the glans occurs.

The /\ configuration that I use and recommend imposes sufficiently little compression on the CS that no blood becomes trapped in the glans.. There is free exchange of blood into and out of the glans and comfortable hanging can literally be done indefinitely.

Squeezing the blood out of the glans prior to constricting the CS in accordance with common BIB application practice is a poor compromise to allowing free exchange of blood to the glans with /\ configuration that I’ve presented herein.

Regarding wrap: it’s totally unnecessary with the /\ configuration, totally irrespective of penis size, because all of the attachment occurs at only approximately 1 square inch of the dorsal portion of the penis (about 0.5” per side adjacent to the dorsal longitudinal axis of the penis). Everyone has 1 square inch of penile surface area.

This is clearly an(other) instance of leading horses to water..

Xeno

Originally Posted by xenolith
What you need to do, as described, perhaps inadequately, elsewhere in this thread, is file the top teeth of your BIB to allow tighter closure of the top bolt.. And this is key: with the BIB spread open at the bottom. Take another look at the two photos of my BIB closed around the toilet paper roll that I posted elsewhere in this thread, you’ll see the kind of closure that you want to modify your BIB to achieve. You’ll find that you need to reduce the length and angles of the sides of the back teetch much more than the front teeth to achieve the desired configuration. When you get it modified in that way, the BIB will close much tighter at the top than in stock form and will allow for sufficient compression over a very small area (~1 square inch) which, of course, any post-pubescent penis has to offer. I’ve hung >100lbs. With ONLY the top bolt tightened.. You really don’t need the bottom ones for anything other than keeping the BIB from flopping around while tightening the top bolt.

Xeno

Originally Posted by xenolith
By the way, I realized that I may not have mentioned that the front lower bolt on my modified BIB is used.. It keeps the front bottom spread open.so, it’s not used to tighten the BIB, it’s used to keep the front of it spread apart! The photos posted elsewhere in this thread show this well.

Anyhoo, didn’t want to continue to leave that little tidbit out of the discussion.

Xeno

Originally Posted by xenolith
Hi Mr. Schlong,

There’s a very good discussion of the modifications to the BIB (Starter or Hardcore) starting at the top of this page: Finding xeno: a penis tale (p. 22)

I think that I can identify one bit of misunderstanding.. At least I think so: the front bottom bolt should be backed out, making the opening at the distal (front) part of the BIB very wide at the bottom.. One needs to bend the lower bottom bolt, and may need to bend the top bolt or wallow out the receiving channel.. But these are well discussed.. I think.on the page that I linked to. Please don’t hesitate to ask further questions if that doesn’t clear it up, it’s worth the little bit of effort to make the BIB even better.

Xeno

I made Xeno’s mod today and it seems superior to the factory config, but I still can’t hang wrapless despite grinding down the spikes all the way even more than Xeno did.. So it leaves me thinking this is not for all sizes, or Xeno hung from the base of the shaft, and not from behind the head. All in all it was worth it, but I wish I could do wrapless

Anybody have success with this?


Genesis 2006 = 5.8" x 4.7" /// Round 3 2019: Hanging again = 7.99" x 5.5" /// ST Goal 2019 = 8" x 6" /// End Game 2020 = 9" x 6.5"

Huge gains right there manko, however I still use my bib starter with padding and ace bandage as wrap. I hang 1/2” to 1” below head.


Then- 5.7 x 4.7 (bpel x mseg)

Now- 7.1 x 5.1 (beg 5.5) // Goal-> 8 x 5.5+

Extender Log 2017

Originally Posted by manko007
I made Xeno’s mod today and it seems superior to the factory config, but I still can’t hang wrapless despite grinding down the spikes all the way even more than Xeno did.. So it leaves me thinking this is not for all sizes, or Xeno hung from the base of the shaft, and not from behind the head. All in all it was worth it, but I wish I could do wrapless

Anybody have success with this?

The modified configuration is for hanging from the base, yes. I gained somewhere around 0.75 to 1.0” using this hanger setup and all of it was hanging as close to the base as possible. Xenolith also wrote that he did his hanging from the base also, except for his “bow and arrow stretch” which was a lighter weight fulcrum hang at a higher angle for a different purpose (BC and IC muscle exercises).

The modification uses a pinch grip rather than the more clamp oriented grip from traditional wrapped Bib hanging. The hanger is more or less resting on dorsal shaft, although it digs in a bit thanks to gravity. It requires that the gravity vector (net force vector more precisely) from the hanger’s grip point is going through the shaft - if the force is going along the axis of the shaft, the hanger will just slip off. And the pinch grip also requires the formation of “shoulders” meaning it needs some tissue to bunch up ahead of it for something to rest on. So between those two things, it’s very difficult to use this configuration to hang near the glans.

Vacuum hangers work better for hanging from the upper shaft, and for upward angles.


Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

Originally Posted by fightclub
Huge gains right there manko, however I still use my bib starter with padding and ace bandage as wrap. I hang 1/2” to 1” below head.

Thanks a lot man. First time I’ve had someone tell me that and it’s been a grueling journey so it means a lot!

I’ll have to try the ace bandage since I got some. I’m afraid it would be rather thick and obtrusive though. How much of it so you use?


Genesis 2006 = 5.8" x 4.7" /// Round 3 2019: Hanging again = 7.99" x 5.5" /// ST Goal 2019 = 8" x 6" /// End Game 2020 = 9" x 6.5"

Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
The modified configuration is for hanging from the base, yes. I gained somewhere around 0.75 to 1.0” using this hanger setup and all of it was hanging as close to the base as possible. Xenolith also wrote that he did his hanging from the base also, except for his “bow and arrow stretch” which was a lighter weight fulcrum hang at a higher angle for a different purpose (BC and IC muscle exercises).

The modification uses a pinch grip rather than the more clamp oriented grip from traditional wrapped Bib hanging. The hanger is more or less resting on dorsal shaft, although it digs in a bit thanks to gravity. It requires that the gravity vector (net force vector more precisely) from the hanger’s grip point is going through the shaft - if the force is going along the axis of the shaft, the hanger will just slip off. And the pinch grip also requires the formation of “shoulders” meaning it needs some tissue to bunch up ahead of it for something to rest on. So between those two things, it’s very difficult to use this configuration to hang near the glans.

Vacuum hangers work better for hanging from the upper shaft, and for upward angles.

Hey there BD. Those are some mad gains from the base. I didnt know you can gain that much. You think that was inner penis since you hung from the base? Have you had gains achieved hanging from behind the bead also? If so how much?

I’ve only done behind the head so I’m curious if hanging from base, mid, and behind head can unlock more gains. There is probably overlap if so but marginally perhaps.

Also I’m not sure what you mean by along the shaft vs through the shaft. You are talking about how if you dont close it all the way the force is not transferred correctly? For the second point for behind the head you also need shoulder formation I believe bib said that is suggested to support and protect the head but not sure.


Genesis 2006 = 5.8" x 4.7" /// Round 3 2019: Hanging again = 7.99" x 5.5" /// ST Goal 2019 = 8" x 6" /// End Game 2020 = 9" x 6.5"

Hey hope the journey is going well for you.

The gains were from ligs, but also I think even the most basal attachment I could get with a Bib was still pulling on roughly half the external shaft. I’ve done a small amount of upward angle vac hanging that may have contributed to length gains. Almost all of it I attribute to downward angle Bib hanging though.

In my experience, the force profile and the affected tissues are definitely different enough to benefit from using both downward angle hanging from the base plus upward angle hanging from the head. I actually think upward angle hanging pulls much more on the inner shaft than downward angles (where the ligs absorb the force before it reaches the inner shaft).

Re: along the shaft vs. through the shaft. With the modified Bib as described in this thread, the force vector, i.e. which direction the weight is pulling needs to go perpendicular to the shaft since the Bib is essentially resting there atop the shaft. If I were to try to use it close to the head, it would dangle down and the force vector would be parallel to the shaft, the Bib would slip off. Then again, I hung SD with it, whereas if one were to go full BTC it would be easier to position closer to the head.

In other words, with this configuration only the top back part of the Bib is closed tight enough to actually grip the shaft (the bottom and front of the hanger are much more open to allow for circulation). If the weight isn’t pulling the tight part of the hanger into the shaft, then the hanger will slip.


Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

Still not sure what you mean. I cant imagine the hanger slipping off since its clamped down really tight. And the zip tie in the back keeps the lower back of the hanger closed if I am not mistaken. I tried hanging from the base but it’s really painful. The hanger slides down as there is no head to create the shoulders. Are shoulders supposed to form near the base?

I’ve been hanging below the head with the new config and it is a God send. I strongly recommend everyone do the Xeno mod. I couldnt get past 12lbs before due to the pain. Now everytime I’m hitting new heavier weights and at 15lbs now and 0 discomfort.

I still need to use wrap. I tried without any it is just too painful and the skin keeps getting stuck everywhere. But the glued therawrap onto the hanger walls certainly aids in improving tracking and slippage. Specially if you are wrap in therawrap and the hanger has therawrap, it’s the best traction you can get.


Genesis 2006 = 5.8" x 4.7" /// Round 3 2019: Hanging again = 7.99" x 5.5" /// ST Goal 2019 = 8" x 6" /// End Game 2020 = 9" x 6.5"

Manko, I think I now understand what BD was explaining. Had a lightbulb moment yesterday - after the mods, the hanger had been gripping on the top of the shaft but over time kept slipping, slowly but surely. This was because the downward direction/force was similar to the standard Bib hanger direction, i.e. more like straight down. I’ve now just pulled back the blue straps so they pass / interfere with the wingnut for the bottom bolt - this way the weight pulls in a slightly different direction and the shaft sort of bends forward a bit as the weight catches more now on the top of the shaft. I might post another photo of mine when I feel I’ve perfected it…. But even with this, I still struggled with slippage and discomfort and I was only at 3.3kg - felt to me like an awful lot of skin stretch had been happening.

So I’ve just wrapped with Theraband first like you suggest, and it’s a big difference! So I think that’s going to be the way for me - a wrap and the right angle.


Start: 6" BPEL x 5" EG (mid)

Current: 7.5" BPEL x 5.98" EG (average distal/mid/base shaft)

Goal: 8" BPEL x 6.5" EG (whole shaft)

Manko, I’ve done some hanging today with the configuration above - have further described with photos here: waterman888 - Waterman888’s progress log

Hope it helps.


Start: 6" BPEL x 5" EG (mid)

Current: 7.5" BPEL x 5.98" EG (average distal/mid/base shaft)

Goal: 8" BPEL x 6.5" EG (whole shaft)

waterman888, that all sounds good.

manko007, if you can attach closer to the glans comfortably, that’s good it will stretch more of the shaft. Some of it may just be down to penis shape; most guys have more comfort attaching closer to the base but if it’s the opposite for you, then by all means do what works. The wrap will inevitably restrict circulation though. Any time a wrap is under compression, and the wrap is less than or equal to girth, it’s going to create a clamp effect.


Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30 AM.