Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Dyson 4000

Such twitterpation over something that doesn’t exist; you’d think this was another “god” thread.

xeno


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.375" BPEL x 6.75" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama

Originally Posted by xenolith
Such twitterpation over something that doesn’t exist; you’d think this was another “god” thread.

xeno

Ahahaha!

Maybe it will come to existence, since some members want to buy it. Then the OP would deserve the blame.

All penis extenders are torture devices. Imagine if you were tied up, and some one slipped a penis extender on you and kept applying maximum tension to get just the right amount of pain. What about a testicle enlarger?

Anyways, I don’t understand how you can justify, with certainty, that this would not be a good product. It looks like you would only come in contact with the red rubber. This doesn’t improve on any extender already in existence, but it might be something for the penis enlargement enthusiast. If this device were available people would buy it just because they wanted a penis extender that looked like it. And, other penis extender vendors offer models with upgrades that serve no purpose.

But honestly, I would not purchase this because I’m fine with the extenders I do have because they work fantastic (And my wife would not let me). But people will buy this, and any product. Remember that penis sock called stealth, I bet he is selling a lot of those, getting rich.


Started ~ 2002 14.5 cm BPEL and 13 cm MSEG.

2008: Got serious, Measured ~ 15 cm BPEL and 14 cm in MSEG

1/12/2014: Measured BPEL 17.5 to 18 cm, MSEG 15, BEG 16.5

Torture to the penis must be the worst and yet we all torture our units with PE so that we can make it bigger.

Originally Posted by crazyant83
All penis extenders are torture devices. Imagine if you were tied up, and some one slipped a penis extender on you and kept applying maximum tension to get just the right amount of pain. What about a testicle enlarger?

Anyways, I don’t understand how you can justify, with certainty, that this would not be a good product. It looks like you would only come in contact with the red rubber. This doesn’t improve on any extender already in existence, but it might be something for the penis enlargement enthusiast. If this device were available people would buy it just because they wanted a penis extender that looked like it. And, other penis extender vendors offer models with upgrades that serve no purpose.

But honestly, I would not purchase this because I’m fine with the extenders I do have because they work fantastic (And my wife would not let me). But people will buy this, and any product. Remember that penis sock called stealth, I bet he is selling a lot of those, getting rich.

Crazyant, I agree with you at least to some extent. The clamps do appear padded so should just as well as the noose or strap on a conventional extender. There is the issue of how you adjust the clamps. If they have a ratcet and release like a cable clamp they would be fine.

The spring out the front is weird if indeed it is a spring. A screw would be better. The device is certainly not stealthy and can you add rods etc as you grow?

Even if this works the real question that need s answers is whether there is any benefit in segmented stretching where each segment of the shaft has the same effective stretch applied as the scissors move out. If the answer is no then at best this would be an expensive over complex device with no benefit over a standard extender.

I like those clamps though. Would like to get one that works properly with say a 1/2” clamping width and with soft silicone pads to fit a standard extender.

Originally Posted by austfred
Crazyant, I agree with you at least to some extent. The clamps do appear padded so should just as well as the noose or strap on a conventional extender. There is the issue of how you adjust the clamps. If they have a ratcet and release like a cable clamp they would be fine.

The spring out the front is weird if indeed it is a spring. A screw would be better. The device is certainly not stealthy and can you add rods etc as you grow?

Even if this works the real question that need s answers is whether there is any benefit in segmented stretching where each segment of the shaft has the same effective stretch applied as the scissors move out. If the answer is no then at best this would be an expensive over complex device with no benefit over a standard extender.

I like those clamps though. Would like to get one that works properly with say a 1/2” clamping width and with soft silicone pads to fit a standard extender.

I really don’t see a benefit. Tension is applied to the entire penis even with only one attachment. The multiple might alleviate some attachment point stresses though, but that is it.

Originally Posted by rootsnatty
I really don’t see a benefit. Tension is applied to the entire penis even with only one attachment. The multiple might alleviate some attachment point stresses though, but that is it.

Roots I suspected as much.

The spring seems to pushing the wrong way! It is compressing the penis, not stretching it.

The images appear to have been tweaked. The words ‘Ducky’ and ‘Adobe’ can be seen in the header.

I wonder how degrees in Neutraceudics, and Plant Molecular Biology aid the development of this product! The word Neutraceudics itself only appears in websites offering male enhancers.

Originally Posted by hetvenkilenc
The spring seems to pushing the wrong way! It is compressing the penis, not stretching it.

The images appear to have been tweaked. The words ‘Ducky’ and ‘Adobe’ can be seen in the header.

I wonder how degrees in Neutraceudics, and Plant Molecular Biology aid the development of this product! The word Neutraceudics itself only appears in websites offering male enhancers.

Ya, but this has pretty much been decided on: it’s not real.

The spring is supposed to pull not push, I think.

And isn’t the penis a plant? I thought mine was green because it was photosynthesizing…

;)

Originally Posted by rootsnatty
I really don’t see a benefit. Tension is applied to the entire penis even with only one attachment. The multiple might alleviate some attachment point stresses though, but that is it.


I think you’re missing the magic of this non-existent thingamajig rootsy (you’re not alone in that). My experience has shown me that discretized volumes of penile tissue (CC/CS/tunica) can be caused to undergo deformation followed by hyperplasia much more effectively than can the entire volume of penile tissue. This is the guiding principle of both the CCCC (Cable Clamp Cock Coffin) and the TT (Tiger Trap); the physics of which I presented here: Strain ellipse mechanics adjacent to clamps. Because of the effectiveness of the discretized stress application in the radial vector that both the CCCC and the TT produce, my EG has increased dramatically since I’ve been using them. Indeed, I’m certain that I can literally continue to growth penile girth by means of discretized radial stress application ad infinitum.

However, heretofore, I’ve not been aware of any device that achieves discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector…until the (non-existent) Dsyon 4000. While I would no doubt modify the thing to make it even more bitchin’ were I able to get my mits on one, the design principle of discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector that it demonstrates is, in my opinion, demonstrative of having been informed by a very keenly informed physiologist.

xeno


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.375" BPEL x 6.75" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama


Last edited by xenolith : 10-17-2014 at .

Originally Posted by xenolith
I think you’re missing the magic of this non-existent thingamajig rootsy (you’re not alone in that). My experience has shown me that discretized volumes of penile tissue (CC/CS/tunica) can be caused to undergo deformation followed by hyperplasia much more effectively than can the entire volume of penile tissue. This is the guiding principle of both the CCCC (Cable Clamp Cock Coffin) and the TT (Tiger Trap); the physics of which I presented here: Strain ellipse mechanics adjacent to clamps. Because of the effectiveness of the discretized stress application in the radial vector that both the CCCC and the TT produce, my EG has increased dramatically since I’ve been using them. Indeed, I’m certain that I can literally continue to growth penile girth by means of discretized radial stress application ad infinitum.

However, heretofore, I’ve not been aware of any device that achieves discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector…until the (non-existent) Dsyon 4000. While I would no doubt modify the thing to make it even more bitchin’ were I able to get my mits on one, the design principle of discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector that it demonstrates is, in my opinion, demonstrative of having been informed by a very keenly informed physiologist.

xeno


Those concepts hinge on wearing the devices erect/engorged though… right?


Keep an open mind and a closed wallet... unless it\'s open to making a donation!

Originally Posted by cantlook
Those concepts hinge on wearing the devices erect/engorged though… right?


Definitely yes in the case of the radial vector; and I don’t think so in the case of the longitudinal vector…I mean stretching a flaccid penis does produce length gains, so I think it makes sense that discretized stretching of a flaccid penis would also produce length gains, just more effectively…but I could be wrong :) .

xeno


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.375" BPEL x 6.75" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama

Originally Posted by xenolith
I think you’re missing the magic of this non-existent thingamajig rootsy (you’re not alone in that). My experience has shown me that discretized volumes of penile tissue (CC/CS/tunica) can be caused to undergo deformation followed by hyperplasia much more effectively than can the entire volume of penile tissue. This is the guiding principle of both the CCCC (Cable Clamp Cock Coffin) and the TT (Tiger Trap); the physics of which I presented here: Strain ellipse mechanics adjacent to clamps. Because of the effectiveness of the discretized stress application in the radial vector that both the CCCC and the TT produce, my EG has increased dramatically since I’ve been using them. Indeed, I’m certain that I can literally continue to growth penile girth by means of discretized radial stress application ad infinitum.

However, heretofore, I’ve not been aware of any device that achieves discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector…until the (non-existent) Dsyon 4000. While I would no doubt modify the thing to make it even more bitchin’ were I able to get my mits on one, the design principle of discretized stress application in the longitudinal vector that it demonstrates is, in my opinion, demonstrative of having been informed by a very keenly informed physiologist.

xeno

I totally get your strain ellipses idea. And I think it is a good one. Actually, I have heard so many people wondering why clamping produces base girth, and it always seemed obvious it was because you were creating a circumferential fulcrum, producing greater strain adjacent to the clamp directly in front of it and behind it. Then I saw your thread linked above and I was like, “ok, at least one other person had this idea as well.”

I just don’t think that is what is happening here. The tension being produced by the spring is a fixed amount defined by the springs displacement. The way tension develops in a tissue, it doesn’t matter how many times this is anchored, the tension in the tissue will only be dependent upon the force produced by the spring. That is, the tension will be equal in the spring and tissue.

I could see the actual clamping of each individual ring possibly creating a slight fulcrum just like the cock coffin, or being able to apply a greater total tension because of a more secure anchoring method without cutting off circulation as much as using a single attachment site. The longitudinal tension between each pair of anchoring rings will be equal aside from any clamping effect from the attachment itself.

An aside: reading about your cock coffin and tiger trap, I had the thought of applying several fulcrums that ran longitudinally down the length of the penis, rather than several circumferential fulcrums. Have you tried this? Putting the tiger trap on with the ridges parallel to the penis would create this effect.

Roots

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 AM.