Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Width Size

If 6 girth isn’t anything special , those of us around 5 must just suck

Originally Posted by dlm4
Im 6 inches in girth and 2 inches wide. I have had some comments about my thickness, but I dont think its anything special.

You must be banging some loose Chicas.

:)

Just kidding.

No really…..


06/21/07 NBP = 7.75(tape) FSL = 7.875 EG = 5.00 Volume= 15.42

09/13/07 NBP = 8.375 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.38 Volume = 19.29 (+25%)

12/26/07 NBP = 8.625 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.50 Volume = 20.82 (+35%)

I think anything less than 7 inches is pretty good

I’m 2” wide from the base up to about an inch and a half. And 6” inches wide at the glans. 5.9” at mid shaft. I don’t know depends on the woman.


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

Norsey, I’m in the same boat as you. Wide and somewhat flat. I never knew what average girth was until Thunders, but I’ve found I can fit in Large condoms(pre-PE) comfortably(girth 5.25, but 5.0 when started PE.)

Originally Posted by johnny9
Norsey, I’m in the same boat as you. Wide and somewhat flat. I never knew what average girth was until Thunders, but I’ve found I can fit in Large condoms(pre-PE) comfortably(girth 5.25, but 5.0 when started PE.)

Well, I hope PE doesn’t make it even flatter.. If that happens I’ll have to do some exercises to target the expansion in the other direction, if such a thing exists, maybe squeeze the sides.. ? A certain flatness might be a good thing though, for instance I think blowjobs could be worse on the woman if you’re ‘deep’ than if you’re just wide.

Originally Posted by Norsey
Well, I hope PE doesn’t make it even flatter.. If that happens I’ll have to do some exercises to target the expansion in the other direction, if such a thing exists, maybe squeeze the sides.. ? A certain flatness might be a good thing though, for instance I think blowjobs could be worse on the woman if you’re ‘deep’ than if you’re just wide.

Agreed on all points.

I do think that overall circumference is all that matters as the vagina is a 3-D object as well, meaning the penis will exert its size in every direction,
not just width-wise.

Look at the standard toilet paper roll.

Try to stick that in your mouth and see how much more difficult a cylindrical object is at a given girth than a wider, more shallow object.


06/21/07 NBP = 7.75(tape) FSL = 7.875 EG = 5.00 Volume= 15.42

09/13/07 NBP = 8.375 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.38 Volume = 19.29 (+25%)

12/26/07 NBP = 8.625 FSL = 8.75 EG = 5.50 Volume = 20.82 (+35%)

I’m really not too sure about all this, does the amount the vagina is stretched depend only on the penis circumference, or is it the cross-sectional area that determines this? Anyone know which it is?

It would be great if it was merely circumference, as then we could go for a wide, flat shaft, which while having huge girth, could still have a relatively normal volume (surface area to volume aration is much higher). Also blow jobs would be managable for girls at larger girths, if the shaft was wide and flat…

p.s. my width is just under 2” and girth is just below 5.5”.

Originally Posted by newguy01
Agreed on all points.

I do think that overall circumference is all that matters as the vagina is a 3-D object as well, meaning the penis will exert its size in every direction,
not just width-wise.

Look at the standard toilet paper roll.

Try to stick that in your mouth and see how much more difficult a cylindrical object is at a given girth than a wider, more shallow object.

Can’t compare the mouth to the vagina like that. Wider, flatter things fit into your mouth easier because your cheeks give more space in that dimension, while teeth tend to limit anything too “tall.”

Anyone with experience have any insight on this topic?

I’ve just been thinking about it. If we view the vaginal walls as having circumferal elastic fibres (do they?), then regardles of the cross-sectional area of the object inserted, the fibres of the walls will stretch to the exact length of the circumference.

Technically, placing an object of 6” girth into a girl will give the exact same stretch as put a thin piece of plastic (with smooth edges ofcourse) of width 3” into her. However, obviously doing the latter will put a lot more PRESSURE on the side walls, as pressure = force/area.

I hypothesize that in terms of the stretch on the viganal walls, only shaft circumference matters, yet when it comes to pressure on the side walls, it is the width of the penis in relation to the depth (i.e. a wide and flat penis will exert more pressure on these walls) that matters…

1.8” (width) is about average. That generally being a 5” circumference (girth). I measure 1.8” width exactly with calipers and 5.25” girth. I am by no means thick or wide. I would say over 2” in width and 6” circumference is thick. Bearing in mind that a 6” x 6” looks thicker than an 8” x 6” in terms of proportion.

Someone once posted a link on here that was cool as shit. You could put in your measurements and the measurements that you wanted to compare it to and it would give you a really cool scaled diagram to compare the size difference. There is a HUGE difference between 7” x 5.25” to an 8” x 6”.


Starting stats NBPEL 6" x EG 4.125" --> Mar 2008 NBPEL 7" x EG 5.25" Current Stats 7" NBPEL x 5.6" EG (Post 1st Round PMMA)

My noose style extender modification

My jelq routine

Interesting.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:39 AM.