Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

What??? (Wikipedia on penis enlargement)

View Poll Results:

Can you believe it Wikipedia doesn’t mention weights?

Yes, I can believe it

1636.36%

No, I can’t believe it

49.09%

Yes, I can believe it but I can’t believe you’re posting a poll

1738.64%

No, I can’t believe it, nor that you’re posting a poll

715.91%
Total Votes: 44. You may not vote on this poll
12

What??? (Wikipedia on penis enlargement)

Can you believe the Wikipedia article on penis enlargement makes no mention of weights? (or MOI??? Just kidding ;-)

I think someone needs to add to it! I’m working on updating my site, which takes priority right now.

The Wikipedia article on PE is a battleground: the article has been locked for ages.

GM

I’m not responding to the poll, except to point out that Wikipedia (basically a good idea) is not monitored as closely as it should be by the experts responsible to keep various areas valid, as to fact.

You are a good example of what I am pointing out. You are updating your own site right now. And that is fine, and a good priority.

Is all the information on breast cancer at Wiki up to date? How would you know? How would I?


_______________

avocet8

That article sucks.

Originally Posted by avocet8
Is all the information on breast cancer at Wiki up to date? How would you know? How would I?

On general scientific topics, Wikipedia is very good. Nature — alongside Science, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world — had experts review a random assortment of Wikipedia science articles and Britannica articles on the same topics. The two encyclopedias had a comparable number of errors (low in both cases).

Where Wikipedia blows is on more obscure topics (e.g., penis size), where there are fewer intelligent and informed contributors to keep editing articles to perfection, and especially on topics where there are Spamming angles and other controversies involved (e.g., penis enlargement). Surprisingly — or maybe not so surprisingly, given the obsessive back-and-forth partisan discussions that go on behind the scenes of such articles — Wiki entries on controversial topics with more widespread mainstream interest tend to be pretty good, in my opinion anyway.

Overall, Wikipedia seems pretty good. I wouldn’t rely on it, but as a substitute for a hardbound encyclopedia it has some advantages. For one, it’s more timely updated.

Use it to gather an overview of a subject and find search terms to use on your own.

The less people know about PE, the better, in my opinion.


*I measure PRE-WORKOUT, normal erection* Started: 7 EBP x 4.9 EG. Several years on and off PE, now 8.125 EBP length x 5.5 EG midshaft (5.8 base). Working on girth (clamping) again after breaks due to injuries - fast recent gains! Pics

Originally Posted by dangleman
The less people know about PE, the better, in my opinion.

Precisely. There are varying degrees to “knowing” about PE as well. It being on wikipedia and our exact methods put in some low level articles or splashed here and there is not too much. Going mainstream is pretty bad.
I don’t think many people here would enjoy PE going mainstream


Start 12/1/06 _ _ _ _ 3 month 3/2/06 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 month 4/2/06 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 month 5/2/06

6.6 X 4.75 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7.25 x 4.90 _ _ _ _ _ _ _7.5 x 4.90 BaseGirth: 5.25 _ _ _ _ 7.75 x 4.90 10 month 9/24/06: Still 7.75 X 4.90 ---- I have focused primarily on girth and have not gained a CM in months.

Journal Pictures

The Fight Club of PE.

PE could save lives, relationships and confidence.

A guy in some Asian country jumped because he didn’t like his size. It’s a thread somewhere this forum (too lazy to search ;) )

/Swensk


Gone cementing - Started (2005): 7.25 NBPEL 5.7 EGMS. 5 years later (2010): 8.25 NBPEL 6.3 EGMS. 8 years later, 3 years with no PE (2013): 8.1 NBPEL 5.9 EGMS

Originally Posted by dangleman
The less people know about PE, the better, in my opinion.

Amen to that one!


PEing since Jan 1st, 2003

People that are committing suicide because their dicks are small probably already know about all the penis enlargement options including PE. If anything, I’d bet PE remaining “underground” would give the guys that really find themselves inadequate more of a chance. On the other hand, if it was mainstream and average Joes were doing it left and right, then there would be no opportunity for these guys to make up the difference.

What does encyclopedia Britannica say about PE? Anyone check it out?

Originally Posted by Swensk
The Fight Club of PE.

PE could save lives, relationships and confidence.

A guy in some Asian country jumped because he didn’t like his size. It’s a thread somewhere this forum (too lazy to search ;) )

/Swensk


well, not me :bigwink:

Originally Posted by ThunderSS
I’m glad Tom didn’t think that way.


Or you Thunder.

Sorry guys, but as a guy that came here with a well below average starting size, and my confidence well down, I thank God for people like Tom, Thunder and everyone else that has ever shared their success (and failures) of PE with me and others.
I truly don’t know where I would be today without PE and their invaluable experience.

Top
12
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
The PE Survey results!remekPenis Enlargement16105-19-2017 12:29 PM
Does anyone have experience with Taoist penis enlargement?Patrick23Penis Enlargement Basics311-21-2004 03:39 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 PM.