Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

# Volume?

## Volume?

I know that the importance of Volume has been discussed already here and some people are even having it in their signature.

But who of you actually hs measured it?
I dont mean the method of taking girth and length to calculate it, but to use water displacement and measure it for real.
I have done it and i gonna use this as my base number to judge my growth (if it happens) from now on. My errect volume is 225 cubic-centimeters and flaccid 130.
As you can see from this number alone im really on the grower side as my errect volume is 1.7 times bigger than flaccud and thats the under limit of the normal range of 1.7 to 5 with 3 being the average.
Also is 225 smaller than my calculated volume of 245 (17cm NBP length and 13.5cm EG), which is clear as my girth is not equally distributed like it would be on a tube with this dimensions.

Has someone lse done a similar analysis? Or maybe i motivated some of you to at least try it.

I was going to do this. But there are a few probels with it:

1) Finding a container that you will fit into properly
2) Accurately measuring the displacement without spilling the water
3) Keeping a rock hard boner going into the water, marking the level etc

Apart from these difficulties, doing the actual displacement measurement is a great idea. Would also like to point out that you will lose a little bit of accuracy because some of the water will stick to your dick, let it drip off before measuring…

also, the scientific way to check a liquid level is to place the container on a flat bench top surface, kneel down so that your eye is directly level to the water, and then mark it.

Also, you should take into account the meniscus (The water ‘bend’ at the edges from the chemical attributes of the Hydrogen bonds in the water stickint to the glass) - that is, measure from the flat surface of the water, not the highest ‘bent-up’ level.

Tell us how you did it. Stick your cock in a glass of water or something and see how much water was displaced? I don’t quite see how you managed the actual measurement.

The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

I took a big glass filled it completly with warm water and put it into a larger bowl. Then I put my cock into this glass and water which was displaced spilled into the bowl. After this is put the water from the bowl into a vessel which allows me to measure it exactly.

I hope this discription helps.

You know, it’s a good try, but there are so many variables that make it inaccurate and difficult to repeat. Things like depth of immersion, keeping your balls out of the water, water on your pubes, level of erection. The biggest factor of all of these is the depth of immersion.

There must be a better way.

The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

Penile MASS (or Vol) Method

My post is last there with a method of using sand

The "average size" is usually over-estimated. Small guys don't take part in surveys and big guys jump at the chance.

Girl claims she had a huge ex? Stick a spider in the bathroom or a mouse in the kitchen and when she comes out screaming ask her how big the spider/mouse was...

You know, there is that make your own dildo web page too, so you can replicate yourself and use the replica to more accurately and consistently displace the agua.

The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

Quote
Originally posted by gprent101
You know, it's a good try, but there are so many variables that make it inaccurate and difficult to repeat. Things like depth of immersion, keeping your balls out of the water, water on your pubes, level of erection. The biggest factor of all of these is the depth of immersion.

There must be a better way.

I too ka glass which is big enough so i cant hit the bottom and i have shaved pubes. Also keeping your balls out is at least for me with an errection not so difficult.
I measured a few times and its pretty consistent.

You know, volume is a bit of an abstract concept anyway, don’t you think? What “she” is interested in, is how long is it, and how much of my hand can I get around it. Or, is that monster going to fit in my mouth/ pussy/ ass?

The primary goal of PE should be to make your penis as healthy as possible in both form and function. If you do that, increased size will follow.

Quote
Originally posted by gprent101

Or, is that monster going to fit in my mouth/ pussy/ ass?

Or, God willing:

“Is that monster going to fit in the bed.”

Quote
Originally posted by gprent101
You know, volume is a bit of an abstract concept anyway, don't you think? What “she” is interested in, is how long is it, and how much of my hand can I get around it. Or, is that monster going to fit in my mouth/ pussy/ ass?

maybe its a better for us to track the gains?

Quote
Originally posted by gprent101
You know, it's a good try, but there are so many variables that make it inaccurate and difficult to repeat. Things like depth of immersion, keeping your balls out of the water, water on your pubes, level of erection. The biggest factor of all of these is the depth of immersion.

There must be a better way.

Exactly. That’s why I settle for a simple cylindrical volume reading. No, it doesn’t give an “exact” volume, but it’s close enough for my purposes. Furthermore, using hydrostatic displacement, you necessarily cannot get a BP reading, only NBP.
I took a cylindrical volume reading when I began, and keep taking them along the way. While the measurement isn’t “exact,” the degree of deviation is probably consistent; therefore, my volume increases are fairly accurate. I even wrote some simple DOS programs to calculate the volumes quickly & easily:
http://www.freewebs.com/waxn~world/
I finished a small Win32 program (the “c0cKuLaToR 1.0.1b”), but haven’t uploaded it to my site. But the simple DOS apps are good enough.

Some of the difficulties of the water displacement method can be addressed - such as using a measuring cup with hash marks, thus preventing the need to “mark” the glass at the increased water level. Also, it’s no big deal to do a cylindrical volume reading of the container - that’s a relatively simple forumula; however, there are several other problems with the water displacement method:
(1) Most containers are not true cylinders - they are often bevelled at the bottom and/or change in diameter (i.e., “taper” somewhat, usually getting thicker from the bottom up - thus preventing a true volume reading - although, you could use a measuring cup to determine the volume of a drinking mug of course).
(2) Water spillage - remember, as you submerge your unit deeper, the water level will be rising and would begin to overflow the top of the container before you’re at your base; and if you make the water level too shallow, to prevent this, you’re also preventing a full submergence of your unit).
(3) Not being able to direct your entire unit into the water, in terms of angle, unless your erection points to 6:00. This would require quite some maneuvering - you’d have to be on top, like you’re humping the cup.
(4) No way to get a BP reading, obviously.

Again, the simple cylinder volume formula is more than adequate - and it allows a BP reading. For my purposes, that’s good enough. Any deviation is probably fairly consistent - so I feel confident in stating that I’ve increased my penile volume by 70% thus far.

 Similar Threads Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Measuring the whole picture - Volume remek Penis Enlargement 106 05-16-2018 06:11 PM VOLUME POLL: I have 1.25 Penises. How about you? EZduzzit Penis Enlargement Basics 9 03-27-2008 04:00 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 AM.