Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

The TRUE Size Experts

Interesting. Ive never treid ballooning before. Read a little on it but it sounds alot like edging to me. Do you just get to the point of no return and hold back over and over again? If this requires porn as a stimulus I wouldnt be able to try it.


Jan 1st/07 - 7 14/16'' BP 4 Month Growth Comparison Pics - First Clamping pics

Feb 2009 - 8.15'' BP / 7.4'' NBP x 5.1'' EG New pics

Ah yes. I remember the great porn famine of ‘07.

Porn had dried up everywhere. No matter where you looked … gone. The internet, once a place teeming with XXX, was an empty husk. A wasteland of shopping, news, and blogs.

Grim times.


Before: I'd like to show you something I'm very proud of, but you'll have to move real close.

After: I\'d like to show you something I\'m very proud of, but you guys in the front row will have to stand back.

God gave men both a penis and a brain, but unfortunately not enough blood supply to run both at the same time. - Robin Williams (:

Originally Posted by MDC
bigger,
Try this link : /pedata/home.php

It allows me to edit my numbers.

But it does’t tell you have a pussy splitting monster ;) .

Originally Posted by kingpole
Hey Wad, I tried to use the calculators they did not work I’m currently 8.25 by 5.7” what is the cubic inches of that?

21.341 cubic inches. It’s big lol!


Start: May 12, 2007 BPEL: 5.551" EG: 4.646" FL: 3.051" FG: 3.858" Please Fill Out My Survey: Click Me!

Now: July 13, 2007 BPEL: 6.250" EG: 5.500" FL: 3.346" FG: 4.488"

Goal: BPEL: 7.000" EG: 6.000" FL: 5.000" FG: 4.750"

Originally Posted by Para-Goomba

Panthro, that’s a great chart! Like so many charts and polls here, though, it leaves out those on the low end (< 4” on either dimension) and extends way past huge into impossible territory (12x8). Do you think you could repost with smaller numbers included alongside the monstrous ones?

I didn’t do the original chart, but here’s a new and improved version that spans from one inch to twelve inches in length, and from two inches to ten inches in girth.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Had some problems with the original attempt at an attachment. Here’s another try. This time it seems to have uploaded without error. It’s an expanded version of the penis volume calculation chart, which spans from one inch to twelve inches in length, and from two inches to ten inches in girth.

Attached Images
PenisVolumeChart.png
(16.4 KB, 139 views)

For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Awesome Lampwick! I really like how it illustrates that the large side of “average” is about twice the volume of the small side of “average,” due to the big effects of girth differences.

Originally Posted by Mr. Happy
Ah yes. I remember the great porn famine of ‘07.

Porn had dried up everywhere. No matter where you looked … gone. The internet, once a place teeming with XXX, was an empty husk. A wasteland of shopping, news, and blogs.

Grim times.

Lol!

I’m guessing bigger is the guy who has quit watching porn…remember the thread, cant remember the poster…

That’s a great program, when entering erect length are we using bone pressed or non-bone pressed?

Originally Posted by The Man
That’s a great program, when entering erect length are we using bone pressed or non-bone pressed?


Hey, The Man, welcome!

Bone pressed is the gold standard for measurements, as it is a more consistent measurement.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Originally Posted by Lampwick

Had some problems with the original attempt at an attachment. Here’s another try. This time it seems to have uploaded without error. It’s an expanded version of the penis volume calculation chart, which spans from one inch to twelve inches in length, and from two inches to ten inches in girth.

The chart is useful to illustrate the basic point., but I disagree with it for a few reasons.

The first is that it is broken down in .5” increments, which is sort of a large measure when gains are measured by .25” or so. I also think that it’s mostly irrelevant to list erect lengths of greater than 10”. There are so few on record longer than this.

It lists 5.5” of girth as average. That’s misleading; 5.5” is actually significantly larger than average by any study you care to name. A woody of 5.5” girth can wear Magnums: it’s large. Smaller increments would allow for a more reasonable distribution of average, high average, etc.

I’m just saying.

But well done otherwise. It does make the point about volume.


Before: I'd like to show you something I'm very proud of, but you'll have to move real close.

After: I\'d like to show you something I\'m very proud of, but you guys in the front row will have to stand back.

God gave men both a penis and a brain, but unfortunately not enough blood supply to run both at the same time. - Robin Williams (:

Originally Posted by Mr. Happy

The chart is useful to illustrate the basic point., but I disagree with it for a few reasons.

The first is that it is broken down in .5” increments, which is sort of a large measure when gains are measured by .25” or so. I also think that it’s mostly irrelevant to list erect lengths of greater than 10”. There are so few on record longer than this.

It lists 5.5” of girth as average. That’s misleading; 5.5” is actually significantly larger than average by any study you care to name. A woody of 5.5” girth can wear Magnums: it’s large. Smaller increments would allow for a more reasonable distribution of average, high average, etc.

I’m just saying.

But well done otherwise. It does make the point about volume.

Good comments, Mr. Happy; thanks! This was basically a rework of the previously posted chart, with more of the smaller numbers included based on Para-Goomba’s comments. The original chart ran from four to eight inches of girth, and four to twelve inches in length. I modified that to run from two to ten inches in girth, and one inch to twelve inches in length. I kept the original chart’s defined range of average length and girth.

I agree regarding girth; would an average girth range of 4.5 to 5 be more realistic? Would 5 to 6 be more realistic for average length rather than 5 to 6.5? I could probably also drop girth values of greater than eight inches, and length of under two inches.

I learned a lot doing this chart the first time; it wouldn’t be very hard to change it to make it more useful.


For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Here’s the new and improved next edition.

Average girth range now specified as 4.5 to 5 inches.
Average length range now specified as 5 to 6 inches.
Length now starts at 2 inches and goes to 9 inches, and girth now starts at 3 inches and goes to 8 inches.
Increments are now 1/4 inch rather than 1/2 inch.

It’s all the penis chart that will fit in less that 800x600.

Attached Images
PenisVolumeChart.png
(20.3 KB, 228 views)

For Lampwick, becoming hung like a donkey was the result of a total commitment.

Originally Posted by wadzilla
….Since this thread is mostly about girth, I plan to write a detailed Rx about what I did, some thoughts on girth, and how girth & length training are different. But I’ll be leaving for a Memorial Day picnic in about 1/2 hour or so. If I’m in any “shape” to post tonight, I will; if not, I’ll follow up on this in the very near future.

I’ve made good on my promise: Here it is

Nice little app, no way to convert it to be used on a Mac under OS X?

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 AM.