Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

The (statistical) Truth About Cock Size

Oh I see. Still does not equate. So there was 1.5 guys over 8.3 out of 300.how does this equate to the 1 out of 741 listed by the original poster?

Originally Posted by 3236148PRES
Oh I see. Still does not equate. So there was 1.5 guys over 8.3 out of 300.how does this equate to the 1 out of 741 listed by the original poster?

A 300 sample I don’t believe is considered significant enough in statistics to draw any accurate conclusion.

I.e. you cannot draw the percentages from it you have.

To do so you need a representative statistical sample of significant number to avoid any “skewing” of the data.

Loads of complicated maths behind “sampling”. But that is why you normally see political polls done in the thousands, not hundreds.


01/08/07: 5.75" BPEL, 5.25" EG ::: 26/05/10: 7.3" BPEL, 5.4" MSEG, [My Progress Pics] - [My Routine]

Revised Min Final Objective: [/b] 7.75" BPEL (33% increase), 5.5" MSEG

Originally Posted by Equine Rooster
If someone had the time and expertise, I am wondering what the gain analysis would show for data entered after this thread was started in January 2005:

Physiologic Indicators (PIs) to help growth!

Maybe add some time to give the thread time to gain popularity, or use the date it was promoted to “article” status.

Then there are these threads:

Warning! If you haven’t gotten improved erections:

Is LESS more, or is MORE more?

If we use the PI’s thread, (notice that now everyone knows what “PI’s” are?), and add about 6 months to the posting date, we are at 4 years since it was posted. I wonder if the number of 2 inch gainers took a big jump around 2007/2008, that would have given them 2 years of implementing the idea of PI’s into their PE. (Of course there are are factors like simply the number of guys doing PE, etc.)

The other two threads were posted in 2007 and 2009, along with some others detailing how to get gains by watching PI’s and EQ. If big gains take the time I think they do, (2-6 years), in my humble opinion, we have not had enough time to see if bigger gains are possible by using the current state of the art. Before 2005, many were basically over training, beating the crap out of their dicks. Even the current guys who have “more is more” work for them probably aren’t doing as much “more” as the guys were doing before 2005, because now they are paying more attention to their PI’s and EQ.

So if 3 inch gains are possible more frequently than a “freak occurrence” as I suspect, (remember this is just a suspicion, don’t think I am taking a super hard stance on this), then we haven’t had the 2-6 years needed to see.

So none of you statisics guys are going to check this? Average gains before the PI’s post verses average gains starting a few months after the PI’s post? Maybe those starting PE a few months after the thread rather than just average gains?

I had to take Statistics 101 three times to pass, so I would just screw it up.


Sept. 4, '07: BPEL 6.875 inches, EG widest 5.25

Goal: Double digits

That makes sense.

Originally Posted by Ruz_
I do believe there are people who can and have gained 3 inches. Just like there are elite athletes such as Lance Armstrong who can do remarkable things physically. Or such as a body builder can get to 25” arms.

However, what I said is I believe these are rare results only open to a few people who have the correct combination of physiology, determination and knowledge. I believe Bib who invented the Bib hanger is such a gainer.

In short I believe anyone who does PE can safely gain 1”, just as most people can lose body fat and get fitter. I think when you start getting towards 2-3” gains in length you are looking at people who in some manner are pre-disposed to gain of a physiological level and those who have dedicated a great deal of time to perfecting routines and techniques to gain. Just as an elite cyclist has to dedicate 6+ hours a day to training.

Most people can do things to avoid being fat. Some can get to an athletic level and then few are elite athletes, I believe the same logic follows with PE.


Later - ttt

So having a 7.75” BP x 5.625” EG is what exactly? Is it 1 out of at least 50?

Originally Posted by mckmas8808
So having a 7.75” BP x 5.625” EG is what exactly? Is it 1 out of at least 50?

7.75 is a bit over +2 SD making a penis longer than yours less frequent than 1 in 44

5.625 is almost +1.5 SD , 1.65 SD meaning a thicker penis than yours is less frequent than 1 in 6 but more frequent than 1 in 20

So:

The frequency that a male has a penis that is both longer and thicker than yours is,

Less frequent than 1 in 256 but more frequent than 1 in 880.

Hope that helps.


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Your math is incorrect. You’re assuming there’s no correlation between length and thickness. There certainly is.

Originally Posted by brazillionaire
Your math is incorrect. You’re assuming there’s no correlation between length and thickness. There certainly is.

Not quantified to date, show me an analysis and covariance and I will concur.


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by asnoman

Some women exaggerate their partner’s penis size to keep their ego up. My ex once bragged my size as 10” (actually little over 8” nbp) to two of her friends and both of them replied their husband too was 10”. I am sure if she had told them my was size 12”, the size of their husband’s penis would have been increased 12” too. I rarely believe on girls for their ex-partners penis size.

Amen to that, women are horrible at guessing a mans size anyway. I’ve had women mistake me for 8” and I just go along with it.


November 08: BPEL = 6.2

August 09: BPEL = 7.0

Here’s a cool thread on lpsg. It shatters some myths about how big the really big dicks are.
http://www.lpsg.org/117329-the-two-dollar-club.html

Guys challenge each other over how many quarters they can fit across the length of their dick. The goal is to get 8, to make the two dollar club. Few make it. Only a very small number can get 9, and a lot of those were borderline. The guy who starts the thread frequently points out that guys claiming ten inches and up are totally absent from this. This is supposed to be a forum for hung guys in the first place, and mythical nine inchers and above don’t appear. Also, the width of a US quarter is 0.955 in.

Originally Posted by Joe_joe
Here’s a cool thread on lpsg. It shatters some myths about how big the really big dicks are.
http://www.lpsg.org/117329-the-two-dollar-club.html

Guys challenge each other over how many quarters they can fit across the length of their dick. The goal is to get 8, to make the two dollar club. Few make it. Only a very small number can get 9, and a lot of those were borderline. The guy who starts the thread frequently points out that guys claiming ten inches and up are totally absent from this. This is supposed to be a forum for hung guys in the first place, and mythical nine inchers and above don’t appear. Also, the width of a US quarter is 0.955 in.

2 fit 8 quarters on my dick, without cheating is a goal of mine. Theres a thread on lpsg about placing 3 quarters on your penis head. Only one person can do that without pumping and ect.


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

I was in the sex toy store yesterday and noticed one of the realistic dongs advertised as 7” That’s about where I’m at so I picked it up and put it where mine would be and it was way bigger both in girth and length. I then held it up to one advertised as 8” They were within 1/4” of each other in length and girth, but clearly different molds. I’m guessing both were around 8.5” (NBPEL)

It made me think of something.

We as a community are obsessed enough with penis size that we regularly spend hours a day for several weeks to add 1/4” or so, and then more hours for another 1/4” and so on.

Women, manufacturers of sex toys and probably most men care about penis size, but clearly not as much. They might round to the inch up or down depending.

Scientists studying penis size will be more accurate,

but it’s interesting how posters on this thread debate on whether the study was bone pressed or non bone pressed. We are more methodical in our observations than scientists studying penis size.

Originally Posted by macrotermitinae
I was in the sex toy store yesterday and noticed one of the realistic dongs advertised as 7” That’s about where I’m at so I picked it up and put it where mine would be and it was way bigger both in girth and length. I then held it up to one advertised as 8” They were within 1/4” of each other in length and girth, but clearly different molds. I’m guessing both were around 8.5” (NBPEL)
It made me think of something.
We as a community are obsessed enough with penis size that we regularly spend hours a day for several weeks to add 1/4” or so, and then more hours for another 1/4” and so on.
Women, manufacturers of sex toys and probably most men care about penis size, but clearly not as much. They might round to the inch up or down depending.
Scientists studying penis size will be more accurate,
but it’s interesting how posters on this thread debate on whether the study was bone pressed or non bone pressed. We are more methodical in our observations than scientists studying penis size.

Just a quick note, I recently realized most dildo’s have a portion on the bottom meant just for holding on to the dildo and it doesn’t count towards the advertised length. I used to think damn! when I would accidentally find some girl’s vibrator but I realized I am actually longer than the average sizes.


PE Goal: 7.5" NBP x 5.8" MSG

These ones were molds of real ones, balls veins and everything. You could definitely what was real and what was added. (They had suction cup bases.)
It was just marketing strategy I think.

Imagine a sex toy marketing meeting.
The analyst says, “women and gay/bi men in sample group A. and B. both chose the eight inch dildo on the table, but group A. wrote that they liked an eight incher and group B. that they liked seven inchers.
The sex toy president puffs his cigar, smiles and says, “Put eight inch dongs in both packages and print out what the suckers think they want to hear.”

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM.