Thunder, great idea about the member acknowledgment. Without that, or some other incentive system, I don’t know how we’ll get enough participants. To do certain analyses well, I’m suspecting we’ll need many, many, many participants, since some analyses will be comparing only tiny subsets of the total subject pool.
I wonder whether “the programmer” still has a strict deadline of Thursday. We can definitely get a good version of this done by then, but more eyes might be able to look at it with a few days extension. Even without that, I think this will turn out well. Analysis will be a bitch, but I’m sure several guys will be interested in helping out there, once the data are in.