I saw no major problems with it mgus. It seems reasonable and the calculations came out in the ball park of real world observations. From what Big Girtha posted I think I’ll see if I can find some Viagra and go have me a bunch of 4 hour erections like I had in puberty.
I was thinking about the Obend theory - not allowing full extension lengthwise would allow girthrestrictive tunica to get a better workout.
About BG’s post - does hypoxia mean the the guys CCs were dead?
Taped onto the dashboard of a car at a junkyard, I once found the following: "Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." The car was crashed.
Primary goal: To have an EQ above average (i.e. streetsmart, compassionate about life and happy) Secondary goal: to make an anagram of my signature denoting how I feel about my gains
<<Priapism is a common complication of sickle cell anemia. We report a little known sequela of priapism: painless megalophallus, with significant penile enlargement. The patient had had an intense episode of priapism 9 years previously and his penis remained enlarged. Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged, hypoxic corpora cavernosa. Megalophallus probably resulted from permanent loss of elasticity of the tunica albuginea due to severe engorgement during the episode of priapism. This sequela needs to be recognized by physicians because no intervention is necessary and sexual function seems to remain intact.>>
From Big Girtha’s link I’m guessing the loss of elasticity means the flaccid size becomes erect size - and the erect size has increased.
Also like Mgus asked what does having hypoxic cc’s mean? If sexual function remains intact is hypoxia that bad?
And again megalophallus pics are as rare as rocking horse droppings!
Feb 2004 BPEL 6.7" NBPEL ???? BPFSL ???? EG 5.65" Feb 2005 BPEL 7.1" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 6.9" EG 5.8" Feb 2006 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.6" EG 5.85" Feb 2007 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.5" EG 5.9"
Originally Posted by mbuc
I’ve just been reading in the Wiki about the anatomy of the tunica surrounding the two corpora cavernosa. What interested me was that each corpora was surrounded by an inner layer of tunica which was strong in the circumferential direction but weak axially; there was also an outer layer of tunica which did not form two tubes but instead went round both corpora. This outer layer was orientated the other way from the inner one in the sense that it was weak circumferentially but strong axially.
Since there is a dual effect of both strengths in both corpora, of course these strengths would have to be I a balance in order to stop the penis from expanding girthwise or leength wise with each pump of the heart.
So I suggest that the soloution is to strengthen the shaft of the penis. Reinforce itcircumfrientially and this woudl lead to the corpora cavernosa and their tunicas to be stressed in the axial path, rather than stress the outer tunica in the circumfriential path. What do you think?
Originally Posted by mbuc
Anybody have any idea as to if priapism leads to permanent enlargement[/i]>> mgus
I’ve read reports of exactly that. Megalophallus was the term used for permanent enlargement caused by priapism in sickle cell anaemia sufferers. Whether it’s correct I don’t know because I would have thought there would be some good photographs of them in the medical world. I have never seen any and I think they would have turned up here if they existed.
This is what got me here in the first place. I tried Viagra as a recreational “kick” back in 2002 and we went at it for almost 4 hours and Mr. Happy was like a friggin meat hook in that it hurt to bend him at all he was so hard. I notice an increase in length and girth that stayed for more than a month and at that point I started searching on the web for more information…eventually leading here.
If you think about it Viagra in this situation must be acting like a “super” kegel with additional blood and clamp pressure at the base (and no fluid buildup!).
It's better to think you're doing something than to sit back and wonder what might have been Start: 12/2003 EBPL: 7 15/16 EG: 5 1/4 Now: 12/2004 EBPL: 8 1/2 EG: 5 5/8 (pumped is 5 7/8 mid, 6.25 base) FL: 6.25