Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Penis Size: The True Average

My wife gets 7”+ every night and most mornings.. And nobody would believe her either!

Who knows, and who cares what scorned women say?

My dick-building experiences here made my mind stronger regarding female bullshit.

I just laugh now.


Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.

As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.

Going for the magic 8"x6"

Originally Posted by a-unit
My wife gets 7”+ every night and most mornings.. And nobody would believe her either!

Who knows, and who cares what scorned women say?

My dick-building experiences here made my mind stronger regarding female bullshit.

I just laugh now.

Why wouldn’t they believe her?

7”+ is not rare — depending on the study, 7” is between 1 in 30 and 1 in 50 — so uncommon, but not rare.

7.5”+ on the other hand is rare and approaches 1 in 500

8”+ is less than 1 in 1000

above 8.5” is extremely rare like 1 in 30,000

A true 9+ inch dick is about 1 in 3 Million

If you take the number from the largest metadata study where the mean is about 5.2” and the SD is .65” then 8”+ = less than 1 in 100,000

About 70% of males in the world are between 4.6” and 6” ERECT.

Building a true 8” by 6” penis through PE is truly building a MONSTER COCK that would qualify you at the LARGE end of PORN STARS.


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by kdong
Why wouldn’t they believe her?

7”+ is not rare — depending on the study, 7” is between 1 in 30 and 1 in 50 — so uncommon, but not rare.

7.5”+ on the other hand is rare and approaches 1 in 500

8”+ is less than 1 in 1000

above 8.5” is extremely rare like 1 in 30,000

A true 9+ inch dick is about 1 in 3 Million

If you take the number from the largest metadata study where the mean is about 5.2” and the SD is .65” then 8”+ = less than 1 in 100,000

About 70% of males in the world are between 4.6” and 6” ERECT.

Building a true 8” by 6” penis through PE is truly building a MONSTER COCK that would qualify you at the LARGE end of PORN STARS.

If a girl has to sleep on average with 30 guys before seeing a 7”, I would call that rare. You have to consider the very small samples of erect penises those girls see.


10/05/14 >> 7.7x5.8 (start stats on 10/05/14) / Short term goal : 8x6 (achieved on 14/06/14 and 23/04/14 respectively)

Mid term goal : 8.5x6.5

Long term goal : 9x7

To give some perspective, the TP data set, even with a -0.375” adjustment for self reporting, would put those same probabilities at:

7 inch: 1 in 8
7.5 inch: 1 in 20
8 inch: 1 in 100
9 inch: 1 in 500


Before 5.5" x 4.1" volume 7.3 ci ////// Now 7.4" x 4.9" volume 14.1 ci

Very few of the 250,000 + members actually enter their stats, and those who do are ‘self selected’, so if many of the folk who come here do so because they are disappointed with their penis it’s likely they won’t enter their stats. Those who do are possibly at the larger end of the spectrum to start with.


Heat makes the difference between gaining quickly or slowly for some guys, or between gaining slowly instead of not at all for others. And the ideal penis size is 7.6" BPEL x 5.6" Mid Girth.

Basics.... firegoat roll How to use the Search button for best results

@firegoat

Visiting this forum over the years, I always had that feeling that mostly average and above guys been around here.

It could be that smaller guys rather not care about the penis size topic and stay away from such forums, or that they are not that motivated to post much.

Could be. We could selectively list reasons why we think ANY data set listed in this thread could be biased one way or another. Many of them are certainly very select population segments, as well as measured in different circumstances with different methods than we use when measuring ourselves for PE purposes. I did remove 0.375” of length and 0.1” of girth from the TP data because I also believe it has an upward bias. Just reminding everybody that we are measuring ourselves here, and there’s a huge discrepancy between what some of the more “feel good” studies in this thread are saying and what our self-reported database (even with corrections) is saying.

I’ve often had your signature ideal 7.6” length and 5.6” of girth in mind as a final goal size, as I found that to be backed up in a lot of the anecdotal threads about ideal sizes. I find it a lot more reasonable to believe, from an evolutionary perspective, that this “ideal” size for the “average” woman would be somewhere around the top 5-15 percentile as reflected in the TP data, rather than in the top 1% as is becoming a popular notion in this thread.


Before 5.5" x 4.1" volume 7.3 ci ////// Now 7.4" x 4.9" volume 14.1 ci

Originally Posted by kdong
Why wouldn’t they believe her?

7”+ is not rare — depending on the study, 7” is between 1 in 30 and 1 in 50 — so uncommon, but not rare.

7.5”+ on the other hand is rare and approaches 1 in 500

8”+ is less than 1 in 1000

Above 8.5” is extremely rare like 1 in 30,000

A true 9+ inch dick is about 1 in 3 Million

If you take the number from the largest metadata study where the mean is about 5.2” and the SD is .65” then 8”+ = less than 1 in 100,000

About 70% of males in the world are between 4.6” and 6” ERECT.

Building a true 8” by 6” penis through PE is truly building a MONSTER COCK that would qualify you at the LARGE end of PORN STARS.

Are these measurements BPEL or NBPEL?

Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
To give some perspective, the TP data set, even with a -0.375” adjustment for self reporting, would put those same probabilities at:

7 inch: 1 in 8
7.5 inch: 1 in 20
8 inch: 1 in 100
9 inch: 1 in 500

I think your maths are a bit off.

The mean is 5.87 with a SD of .8 = if we reduce the sizes by .375, without adjusting for SD, we get 5.5 for the mean.

that puts 7” at almost 2 SD which excludes 95.5% plus another 2.2% Below 2 SD — leaving only 2.2% or 1 in 45

7.5” is actually 2.5 SD which is 1 in 160 above 2.5 SD

8” is 3.25 SD which is 1 in 1000

9” is 4.5 SD 1 in 294,000

you have to double the odss for sigma values because we only care about the high side

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2…%80%9399.7_rule


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by Belle316
Are these measurements BPEL or NBPEL?

BPEL — based on metadata study where the measurement were done by health professionals

corroborated by 14000 BPFSL measured penises which correlate very closely


Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by StefanoPP
Any man?
Are you sure that the adjective “any” is appropriate? If it were true, your experience would be a global experience.

Well, most.

Once the bills are paid and the dishes are done.


Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.

As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.

Going for the magic 8"x6"

Originally Posted by kdong
I think your maths are a bit off.

The mean is 5.87 with a SD of .8 = if we reduce the sizes by .375, without adjusting for SD, we get 5.5 for the mean.

that puts 7” at almost 2 SD which excludes 95.5% plus another 2.2% Below 2 SD — leaving only 2.2% or 1 in 45

7.5” is actually 2.5 SD which is 1 in 160 above 2.5 SD

8” is 3.25 SD which is 1 in 1000

9” is 4.5 SD 1 in 294,000

you have to double the odss for sigma values because we only care about the high side

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2…%80%9399.7_rule

I didn’t do any math, so it’s not off. It’s just the TP data set. Worth a look for some counter-perspective to all the studies in this thread.
Penis Enlargement Statistics Site


Before 5.5" x 4.1" volume 7.3 ci ////// Now 7.4" x 4.9" volume 14.1 ci

Originally Posted by kdong
BPEL — based on metadata study where the measurement were done by health professionals

corroborated by 14000 BPFSL measured penises which correlate very closely

Hard to believe, but stats are stats (and likely much more accurate than personal perception and bias). I’m slightly over 7.75” BPEL now, and it doesn’t look small, but it doesn’t look huge either, even if I push 90% of the fat pad out of the way.

In all honesty, if someone where to hook me up to a lie detector and ask me how I felt about my size, I’d just say above average at best…but then I’ve only ever seen 1 erect penis in my life…my own.


Current: BPEL 7.9"/NBPEL 6.75" MEG 5.2", BPFL 6.5"/NBPFL 5.5" FG 4.4"

---

Realistic Goal: BPEL 8.5"/NBPEL 7.5" EG 5.5" | Optimistic: BPEL 9"/NBPEL 8" MEG 5.75" | Dream: BPEL 10"/NBPEL 9" MEG 6.5"

Well, as I said before I never asked any woman about my size and their ex’s sizes. I only asked my wife. I am her second biggest and she said she had 8 guys. Her biggest was pretty much my length, perhaps a tad longer than I am now but his girth was way above 6. Don’t know exactly how much. So in 9 men, according to her the biggest was 7 plus something long and 6 plus something girth. Second biggest was me at 6.5 length and 5.2 girth pre PE. The rest were average except one who was small, about 5 long perhaps a liitle smaller.

So we have one guy big. One guy well above average, just not big, me. One guy below average and six guys average size. I don’t know if that says anything.


BPEL 7 EG 5.5 NBPEL 6.5 Flaccid length 4.5. Started Jan 2015 at bpel 6.5 nbpel 6.0 and eg 5.2 flaccid length was 3.5

I have reached my goal. At least for now.

Originally Posted by bill10
Well, as I said before I never asked any woman about my size and their ex’s sizes. I only asked my wife. I am her second biggest and she said she had 8 guys. Her biggest was pretty much my length, perhaps a tad longer than I am now but his girth was way above 6. Don’t know exactly how much. So in 9 men, according to her the biggest was 7 plus something long and 6 plus something girth. Second biggest was me at 6.5 length and 5.2 girth pre PE. The rest were average except one who was small, about 5 long perhaps a liitle smaller.

So we have one guy big. One guy well above average, just not big, me. One guy below average and six guys average size. I don’t know if that says anything.

Just for fun, let’s calculate the probability of 7 and 6.5 being the biggest dicks she saw using www.howlongismyschlong.com data. 6.5” would be 81.7th percentile and 7” would be 93.4th percentile. The probability to see someone your size or bigger with 9 partners is 1-(0.817)^9=83%. If we forget about you being 6.5” and just look at her previous partners, the probability of her having seen a penis of at least 7” is 1-0.066^8=42%.

So what that says is it’s really not that surprising she saw a 7” if she slept with 8 previous guys and that it would actually be surprising if she had not had someone your size in 9 partners. And since 5” is on the other side of the spectrum at 18.2th percentile, it would also have been surprising if she had not seen at least one guy 5” or smaller.


10/05/14 >> 7.7x5.8 (start stats on 10/05/14) / Short term goal : 8x6 (achieved on 14/06/14 and 23/04/14 respectively)

Mid term goal : 8.5x6.5

Long term goal : 9x7

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM.