The one to the right.
The function does not look like EL=(0.936+0.761 × (SL)) at all. It is much steeper.
Yes your stats are pretty good. Keep in mind though that this study was performed in china. Compared to the other studies (marineras last link) this study’s length does not fall short though.
The sample size is great!! Of course, erect sample size could have been better, but the study shows how well stretched and erect length correlate.
I would not call 5.079” just under 6” either.
True, I didn’t notice until after I posted this was the same China study that was posted a page or two back. Also you are right about BP, the 5.9” was the 95th percentile, which seems to be questionable, as 5” BP does seem oftly small.