Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Penis Size: The True Average

gwinea2000,

Well believe it or not, it’s true. (also 1 in 4 men suffer from premature ejaculation, which makes them cum even faster than that.)

I think it’s from all the practice masterbating and learning how the best way to stimulate yourself the fastest. I found when I was quite young that I used to squeeze my PC muscle while I self-pleasured to make it feel really good, but then when I started have real sex I still did this, which was not nessassary and led to me reaching orgasm faster than I should have. I think this would be the case with most guys who ejaculate within a few minutes. After doing kegels though and becoming attuned to my PC muscle and keeping it relaxed during sex I found I could last much longer. And then throw some Taoist sexual practices in there and I am now a human pleasure machine.


:flame: "If you build it, they will cum."

Redwood\'s Progress Report/Routines Thread.

[/i]>>What I mean by “fluffing” is stimulating yourself so you are almost semierect so you look bigger than your usual flaccid size.<<[/i]

The cool thing is that long-term PE, at least while one still actively practices it, can produce a flaccid that commonly hangs in an “almost semierect” state without any fluffing. After about four months of hanging, mine started to do this.

Goomba-Stud,

We’ll just keep it a secret between you and me, o.k?

:hearno:


"It's not the getting there but the going that's gotta be good." Varg

Horsehung

Goomba-Stud,

Mine too. Another perk of PE.

Horse


"It's not the getting there but the going that's gotta be good." Varg

Horsehung

Trigger,

That’s a great story. If I did that on a beach where I live, I’d be spending the night in the slammer. Guess I’ll have to reserve it for my lady. She keeps calling me a big prick. What do you think she means by that?

:surf:

:rolling:

Horsehung


"It's not the getting there but the going that's gotta be good." Varg

Horsehung

Originally Posted by jGman
Great discussion here. Cudos to Wad and Para.

While I agree with Wad that each of the studies taken by themselves may not constitute a large enough sampling, the fact that there are seven separate and distinct studies listed, balances out the lesser respondents for each individual study. Otherwise, think of the probability that among each of the seven studies, that each one somehow was able to only locate men with smaller-than-average penises.

Personally, I don’t give a whole lot of credence to the Kinsey study as far as penis size. While the work he did was groundbreaking, to have 3000+ men measure their own penises with an index card is not what I would consider rock-solid evidence of the average size of the penis. It doesn’t seem it was far off from the average, but looking at these other studies, it just may be a bit on the high side….

Average is somewhere around 6 inches.

I don’t believe Kinsey is the last word of course. There are two things that jump to my mind: (1) The output of the data is not precise enough for my likings [the results are all in 1/4” jumps - did they simply round off the size? - if so, which way?], (2) They are only NBP - and taken at a time when our society was far thinner.

When it comes to researcher-measured or self-measured, each has it’s drawbacks. With self-measure, cheating is presumed; with researcher-measure, sub-maximal erection must be assumed. I know if I was waiting my turn to get measured, fiddling with my yo-yo and a stranger approached me, I would feel pressure, anxiety….I’m sure my stiffy would not be 100% - or even very close. As a footnote to this, I tried an experiment the other night about varying sizes with erection. I wanted to determine the minimal firmness at which I could still penetrate a vagina - and take a measurement at that level. I was 1” away from my max. I’m not suggesting that the participants in any research-measured study would be that far off a maximal erection, but it just shows the size variance potential. But I would say this - if you think that Kinsey folks may have added a 1/2” or so (some of them, anyway), it’s possible that a guy getting measured by a researcher could be that far away from his maximal wood also.

Six of one, half dozen of the other?

And remember, with Kinsey 0.2% of men did report a length of only 3.75”, and 3.2% reported lengths of 4.75” or less. And nearly 6% of men reported their thickest girth at 3.75” or less. Funny how we don’t hear much about that, just guys bitching that the average seems “inflated.”

Anyway, the ideal study approach would be this:

(1) Each participant receives a dose of Viagra (or similar drug) in advance
(2) A researcher takes 4 measurements: NBP, BPEL, EG - base & midshaft
(3) Measurements be taken in mms, not inches, for precision

I would also suggest that these participants should be in a small room by themselves (to minimize self-consciousness or pressure) - with some porn assistance, if need be. And the researchers should be out in the hall, ready to by summoned when Mr. Woody is in a full rage.

I would also suggest more than 300 or 3,000 participants. Also, it would be beneficial if researchers could compile data from several parts of the country, with a good variation on age, race, etc.

Such a study could come damn close to determining a “true average” - taking into account bodyfat as well. Because, face it, if two guys come in to be measured (and let’s say their penis “size” is identical), but one is very fat while the other is very thin, they’re going to post considerably different measurements - deviating perhaps more than an inch. Such data would be very misleading, especially since the thin guy’s cock will “shrink” if he gets fat, and the fat guys cock will “grow” if he loses weight.

I have added an eighth study to the original post, in case anyone is interested. 200 Turkish men, ages 20-22, averaged 5.01” NBPEL.


Please :donatecar to Thunder's Place to keep it running.

I was reading about the Korean study and I don’t know wtf they’re talking about. Stretch penis? So it was just grabbed and pulled out and measured? That’s some bull that korean men’s average is 4.5 erect. I’m korean and before I started I had a 6” pecker and the korean hoes I fooked never said anything about my dick being big.

What about african men, caribbean men (west indies, french antillies, latin countries) and south american men?

Hah, sorry guys. I saw this post and had to give my input. I’m also Korean and I’m started with a 6.4” BPEL. Someone mentioned there might be some nutritional or genetic differences between countries, and that may make some difference.. But I severly doubt the Korean average is 4.5” (also, why was the Korean study BPF” + .25”?). I was born and raised in America so I can’t speak for all Koreans. I just hope no one in this forum is getting a huge ego boost everytime they see a Korean man just cause they think he’s got a small penis.

Limmer, I also doubt the Korean-American average is 4.5”, since nutrition probably explains part of the unusually small size found in the Korean study. There could be average size differences between ethnic groups due to genetics, but it’s hard to say — almost all the good studies have been done on populations who are predominantly of European descent (and who live in nations with excellent nutrition).

Originally Posted by Limmer
Hah, sorry guys. I saw this post and had to give my input. I’m also Korean and I’m started with a 6.4” BPEL. Someone mentioned there might be some nutritional or genetic differences between countries, and that may make some difference.. But I severly doubt the Korean average is 4.5” (also, why was the Korean study BPF” + .25”?). I was born and raised in America so I can’t speak for all Koreans. I just hope no one in this forum is getting a huge ego boost everytime they see a Korean man just cause they think he’s got a small penis.

Limmer

One thing I notice living in NY that 2nd generation Asians seem to be a lot bigger that their parents, I’m not talking dick size just size in general.


I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work. Thomas Edison (1847-1931)

Originally Posted by Para-Goomba
— almost all the good studies have been done on populations who are predominantly of European descent (and who live in nations with excellent nutrition).

This is true, except that the US no longer qualifies as a nation with excellent nutrition. :)


Running a Massive Co-Front.

:chuckle: too much nutrition is better then too little, I think most of the effects would be from middle age onwards and so wouldnt affect this ‘growth’ survey. So long as it BP that is

Penis average’s are hold low, because; (not my theory)

- other man will feel insecure about their dicks.
- they get psychological problems and all kinds of other problems that come with it.
- less produktive in work
- bad for the economy

Sometime’s (not always) I don’t trust schientific research altough I study myself. Especially when it tells you how you should think or feel.

It can be that there is a research done by some people and a second later another person sets in a process that will lead to a research that contradicts.
Now maybe the first research is bullshit and the next one is the truth that has not manifested yet.


I, can, I can, I can not, can not compute..


Last edited by anon771 : 10-08-2005 at .
Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49 PM.