Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Penis Size: The True Average

Love it! In the 16% crowd!

Like all of us are in the 16% crowd, doesn’t that seem fishy to you guys? lol

PE Goal: 7.5" NBP x 5.8" MSG

What I want to know is what are the chances of having over 8 inches of length AND 6 inches of girth. Is that like 1/8000 or something (even with assuming a correlation)?

Having girl problems?

I think The Invisible wrote down it somewhere. Priapologist also.

Yes, Invisible probably did something about that in his progress log.

Start: BPEL 6.5" BaseEG 5.0" MidEG 4.5" | Now: BPEL 7.0" BaseEG 5.75+" -- MidEG 5.0"

All of this number manipulation sounds like a way to make oneself feel better about being a teeny weeny. I’ll feel better when I construct an anaconda between my legs.

What I want to know is what are the chances of having over 8 inches of length AND 6 inches of girth. Is that like 1/8000 or something (even with assuming a correlation)?

If we use a 5.9 mean and a .8 SD 8 inches in length is 2.625 SD above the mean — less than 1 out of 200 men are that long. (2.576 SD =1/200)

If we use 5 mean and .5 SD 6 inches in girth that equates to 2 SD above the mean or 1 out of 42.

Assuming no correlation, less than 1 in 8400 would have a penis that is both at least 8” long and at least 6” in girth.

Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

^ We can’t assume no correlation - there must be “some” correlation. Obviously there are no 3” long cocks having 6” girth and no 8” long cocks with 3” girth. There is a range of proportions that assure a functional penis, so a large size in one direction implies a somewhat larger than average size in the other direction too.

Just a speculation…

Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

I dunno about that. I read a thing where a urologist said that long dicks are more likely to be skinny (proportionally to shorter dicks), so are as a result are less rigid and more prone to injury.

Makes some sense. Just like really tall people are less likely to be also really fat.

4/2008 Bpel 6.50, Beg 5.5, Mseg 4.9

6/2008 Bpel 6.75, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

9/2008 Bpel 7.00, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1

Let’s take the average (rounde) : EL= 6”; EG = 5”.
5/6= 0.8 (rounded again).

10” are rare. 10”x8” even more. I think the reason is there are adding to low chances events, so the odds are even lower. But what I dunno.

Originally Posted by bluray
Like all of us are in the 16% crowd, doesn’t that seem fishy to you guys? Lol

Fishy? Any particular reason you’d feel that way?

Originally Posted by kdong
If we use a 5.9 mean and a .8 SD 8 inches in length is 2.625 SD above the mean — less than 1 out of 200 men are that long. (2.576 SD =1/200)

If we use 5 mean and .5 SD 6 inches in girth that equates to 2 SD above the mean or 1 out of 42.

Assuming no correlation, less than 1 in 8400 would have a penis that is both at least 8” long and at least 6” in girth.

As someone else said, there will likely be some kind of correlation between the length and girth. It would take a new kind of poll, however, where members would need to state their length AND girth in the same poll, connecting the two.

8” length would receive some kind of ratio and 6” girth would receive another. And if not using a poll, perhaps using the PE database with each member’s starting sizes? Then, use the ratios found for the size we’re interested in and somehow weigh that into the equation, just using a mean value between the 8” length ratio and the 6” girth ratio or something.

I’m no mathematician or statistics expert, but it seems sort of logic to me.

"You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts."

Regarding girth to length correlation, here’s chart:

As with anything in the internet, all data is suspect, especially if it’s self reported. The chart, by the way, is linked from:

If girth is king, why the hell does everyone keep talking about length?

Originally Posted by WayneCider
Regarding girth to length correlation, here’s chart:

As with anything in the internet, all data is suspect, especially if it’s self reported. The chart, by the way, is linked from:

Just visually trying to fit a line to those values, it looks like the average girth/length is 0.8. However, the spread is quite large.

"You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts."

I need this info.

Men always exaggerate the size of there penis.

Lmbjless

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 AM.