Thank you for the extensive reply. (Also thanks for the variety of brilliant threads recently!) I will address each of your substantive points.
…any national study (Israeli, British, Korean, etc.) is going to give a skewed picture of the “average man” - unless, of course, you’ve compiled these studies from about 170 countries.
…however, most men are not going to be at 110% wood when…
And I have to wonder about that Durex condom study…I think it’s a bit over-optimistic to think these guys were all being measured at 100%.
I just think it’s a bit self-deluding to think that a vast number of men out there are only around 5” BP; whereas the big cocks are as rarely seen as Halley’s Comet.
Kinsey stated that the most common size was 6” (NBP), I do tend to believe that’s about as accurate as anything we’ve come across.
And most of the studies you’ve cited contained only about 55-300 subjects; most were only about 100; 1 study examined over 3,000 men.
1) The vast majority of men are between 5.5-6.5” NBP (a huge number of men).
2) Huge dicks are statistically rare, but not as rare as many tend to believe, perhaps, and
3) Women definitely, without question, prefer a big dick over a small dick.
I know it’s sort of silly that we’re arguing over only one inch here, but that inch matters to plenty of men, and I don’t think that any of your criticisms of these studies holds water. In the end, I cannot compel anyone to put more trust in the data than in friends’ and women’s anecdotes; my goal has been simply to establish what the data say.