Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Penis Charts


Penis Charts

Sorry for the long post here but I thought there would be some interest. I was on the site a couple weeks ago and found the page with the PE data download. I downloaded it and was impressed by the amount of information in the file. Nearly 12,000 records!!

I am not a statistician but I do work with numbers on a daily basis - forecasting, modeling, projecting and basic analytical work. With 12,000 records I could not help myself, I had to try to read into them.

We have all seen the size surveys - average length is X.XX and average girth is X.XX. But I have never seen survey results that combined length AND girth. This data allowed me to do just that.

The first thing I did was remove the duplicates. For members with multiple entries, I used the smallest or earliest entry. This brought the record count down to about 4,900 individuals. From there I removed the really odd entries - 1” girths, 15” lengths etc. There were surprisingly few of those, and I was left with 4,832 records.

The results are bigger than real world norms, but very reasonable considering it is data from dedicated boner builders and most first entries were likely made after some success. The initial results were..

Average Length = 6.4”, Average Girth = 5.1”
Median Length = 6.5”, Median Girth = 5.04

But this does not mean the guy exactly at the 50 percentile mark was 6.5 X 5.04. Average L’s and G’s as normally stated are independent of each other. The database allowed me to analyze L&G together and the actual median size for the group is 6.2 X 4.7.

Only 30% have Length equal to or bigger than 6.5 AND Girth equal to or bigger than 5.04. There were 500 records with lengths ranging from 6.4 to 6.6”. Of those, 36% have girths under 5”, 26% under 4.75” and 11% are over 5.5”.

I created a couple of grids to help me make sense of this (see attachment). One grid is for volume using the (r*r*h*3.1416 formula). I know this does not give 100% accurate volumes but when the same formulas are applied to all dimensions, the results are directionally and comparatively relevant. I also included colored coded percentile ranges in this grid. The other grid is for Length and Girth. Look up your numbers and it will tell you your size percentile. Example: 7 X 5.5 is at the 87% mark - 87% are shorter and/or thinner and just 13% are longer AND thicker.

I threw in couple of graphs laying in measurements from the database compared to the Pre-PE polls. I’d like to do some “adjustments” to “normalize” the data and recreate these charts as well as make some different ones. Any suggestions for different analytics are welcome.

Attached Files
PE Charts.pdf
(226.1 KB, 697 views)

WOW nice job bny68!


Great info! I will study in more detail tomorrow when my eyes aren’t so tired. Thanks bny68!

Very good work bny68.

Absolute Legend.

Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Dumb question. Are the stats BP or NPBP?

Great work, I’ve been searching for something like that a while. :)

Baywatch, bpel.

comparison pictures

"Among the best pics, for sure." commanderblop - thunders

"These are outstanding proof pics!!" going411by7 - pegym

Very nicely done!! Thanks!

:_pump: :donatecar

Now Thundersplace has some stats to it.

Started: NBPEL 5.5 == EG: 5

Current: NBPEL 7.5 == EG: 6

Goal: NBPEL 8 == EG: 6

Dang dude nice job.


Sep.12, 2007

BPEL 7.75" and EG 5.125"


Start (Oct 2010) NBPEL: 5, BPEL: 5.875 inches, BASE GIRTH: 5.25 inches, MID GIRTH: 5

(November 2013) NBPEL: 5.875, BPEL: 6.625 inches, BASE GIRTH: 5.625 inches, MID GIRTH: 5

Goal NBPEL(7-7.5)xMEG(5.5-6) (journal)

I am bigger than both average girths but now I must completely sail over that average by atleast an inch. New insecurity seeps iin.

Started: NBPEL 5.5 == EG: 5

Current: NBPEL 7.5 == EG: 6

Goal: NBPEL 8 == EG: 6

Great great job. Well done and thank you for your time. The data follows a normal distribution as is expected for any large scale study in real world. Even things like height, wealth, and just about anything natural should follow a normal distribution.

Your result and careful filtering of the data show that this is what should be expected in general. This now shows the probability and trend of penis sizes any woman will experience in the real world.

Once again, good job!

Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Dr. Kaplan Penis QuizwadzillaPenis Enlargement3103-12-2011 07:54 PM
Lengthening Shortened Penis Caused By Peyronie's...penismithMen's Sexual Health310-31-2010 11:02 AM
Has anyone heard about this surgery?danglemanPenis Enlargement2511-24-2009 05:50 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 AM.