Last but not least: is something that lasts for 9 years permanent enough in your book, Wad? Because, you see, your axiom “Gains last only three years because they are just elastic loss” doesn't quite accords with the abstract you are citing:
“…The patient had had an intense episode of priapism 9 years previously and his penis remained enlarged….”
marinera, I never said “gains last only 3 years.” Never. You are now clearly just being argumentative. I said - if you even care to know - that I kept my enlargement for 3+ years without any losses - then the losses came. Some like lil12big1 kept a percentage of their gains for even longer.
What caused the enlarged TA to fix at that enlarged size, if not structural changes in the penile tissue? This means production of new tissue, IMO - the amount of tissue after the enlargement was bigger than before.
So why doesn’t this apply to weight training? Why not more tissue keeping those larger muscles for years after your last gym workout.
”..A 33 year old man presented to us with a history of neglected priapism for 12 days 2 years previously. He developed a permanent unusual enlargement of the penis..”
How could an elastic enlargement achieved in 12 days last for 2 years? Elastic gains should last the same amount of time that is needed to achieved them or less - here we have exactly the opposite.
(1) Who could “build unusual (tissue) enlargement” in 12 days? So why not just PE for 12 days then quit? Or the same with going to the gym? NO TISSUE GAINS can occur in 12 days - certainly not “unusual enlargement” unless there was deformation.
(2) Who said that elastic gains should last the same amount of time that is need to achieve them or less”??? What I said is that elastic gains should last until those cells had been “recycled” vian one's DNA - this has nothing to do with the length of time that it took to deform those tissues.
See, reading articles about rat tail tendons can be more useful than misunderstanding abstracts about priapism.
So keep reading them.
Look, I can go on and on…you mention fibrosis, yet the article specifically states that he did not experience that, but that he had NORMAL FUNCTIONING of the penis.
no one supports your hypothesis that penis can grows only by 'elastic deformation'.
With that statement, I see your delusionality. Many here agree with me. I’ve seen posts in the forum that specifically stated that MY view is the one that makes sense. I’ve also received a number of PMs to that effect.
If you can’t/won’t understand what I wrote in 50+ pages then 500+ posts won’t matter. Keep reading your unrelated extracts and, as you’ve habitually done, grossly misrepresenting what I’ve said.
I’m done with this political bullshit. This was never a part of the forum before; now, you get more politics here than on all the Sunday afternoon news programs.
But Wad, they say when you use ADS the dick becomes longer and thicker, but you say just longer and smaller? What is right?
Doctors here in Sweden say that it becomes this way. (Longer and thicker)