Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

If you could right now add the results of the following 2 routines onto your dick...

If you could right now add the results of the following 2 routines onto your dick...

….which one would you choose? Between the two following routines, if you could just choose one of these routines and then have whatever the likely gains that you would make on these routines added to your dick, which one would you pick- i.e. which one do you think would let you catch the most gains?

A.) The newbie routine for 5 straight years with a slight increase in jelq time/intensity every six months.

B.) A balls to the wall, right at the ceiling of your limit for discoloration/negative PI’s routine which was a dick crushing synergy of pumping/clamping/hanging/jelqing/stretching etc.etc.etc., but for only 2 and 1/2 years.

Assuming you were to remain uninjured, which routine (i.e. it’s results) would you bet your money on providing you with the most gains and why?


THEN: bpel 6.0 eg 5.0 bpfsl 6.125 NOW: bpel 7.375 eg 5.25 bpfsl 7.625

---------------------------------------------------------------------

"Right now our only hope is in the hydrogen bomb." - Charles Bukowski

A.

I think the good thing about light exercises are there are no limits, you never toughen your dick to the point where it can’t take anymore. I think, if B does surpass the natural limits, it’s only through damaging your dick and MAJOR discoloration; whatever guys may say, I don’t think anyone really wants a dick that looks like a blown up beef jerky.


Going for 6 inches of girth, wish me luck.

I think I’m leaning towards A.) too. However, the assumption here is that you don’t injure or discolor your dick with either. If you believe in toughening and it limiting gains then B.) probably isn’t for you.


THEN: bpel 6.0 eg 5.0 bpfsl 6.125 NOW: bpel 7.375 eg 5.25 bpfsl 7.625

---------------------------------------------------------------------

"Right now our only hope is in the hydrogen bomb." - Charles Bukowski

I prefer A, but I do B because I don’t think manual exercises are enough, even given 5 years.


Then: 6.75" x 5" ----> Now: 8.5" x 5.75"

Statstatstats.

The first routing is safer overall, but the second one fit’s my personality better.

If it ain’t hurting like hell, you ain’t trying hard enough!! Beware of ED!!

A - “A” because “A” comes before “B”. This is what I learned watching Sesame Street. Hehehehe!

I like A” it almost guarantee’s no injuries however there should be at least 5-10 jelqs added in every week until decon break. When decon is over start out with about 150 jelqs and increase it incrementally tell you max out at about 600 jelqs.


Speak softly carry a big dick, I'm mean stick!

Definitely A. I think some ADS should always be in your routine though.


In search of a perfect body, penis, and girl.

The search NO longer continues. :)

A. Takes time but is better in every way.

What if toughening really just comes in direct proportion to growth of your dick? Then A would be a poor way because growth is way slower but along the same point of line of growth you still end up with just as toughened a dick. I mean, I’m not sure that super-light PE means better ratio of growth to toughening. I suspect it might just mean less growth including less toughening in direct proportion.

I realize there’s a point where too much is too much. But I don’t see any to believe that attaining a higher level of growth through greater intensity necessarily means a higher ratio of toughening to growth. If the ratio of toughening to growth is the same with PE routines with much greater intensity than this hypothetical 5-year jelq plan, then the former would be much better because it would mean you are having sex with a larger dick much sooner. Life’s short — that’s an important factor.

Moreover, it’s very well quite possible that toughening has just as much to do with how long you have been PEing even if that PEing is very light. That is, it’s possible the ratio of toughening to growth is actually greater if you’re taking a long time to get the growth but jelqing every day for years rather than getting the growth in 2 years or something.

Originally Posted by wantsmore
….which one would you choose? Between the two following routines, if you could just choose one of these routines and then have whatever the likely gains that you would make on these routines added to your dick, which one would you pick- i.e. which one do you think would let you catch the most gains?

A.) The newbie routine for 5 straight years with a slight increase in jelq time/intensity every six months.

B.) A balls to the wall, right at the ceiling of your limit for discoloration/negative PI’s routine which was a dick crushing synergy of pumping/clamping/hanging/jelqing/stretching etc.etc.etc., but for only 2 and 1/2 years.

Assuming you were to remain uninjured, which routine (i.e. it’s results) would you bet your money on providing you with the most gains and why?

I don’t see the issue here.

What I mean by that is everyone has a differing penis, physiology, available time and objective. For some, the newbie routine over a few years could deliver them the results they want. However, for some they may have to hang to get the results they want.

Essentially I’m saying you should listen to your own unit. The best gains are achieved by feeling the results without pushing into injury.

I think you are asking an impossible question.


01/08/07: 5.75" BPEL, 5.25" EG ::: 26/05/10: 7.3" BPEL, 5.4" MSEG, [My Progress Pics] - [My Routine]

Revised Min Final Objective: [/b] 7.75" BPEL (33% increase), 5.5" MSEG

Originally Posted by vkn1
What if toughening really just comes in direct proportion to growth of your dick? Then A would be a poor way because growth is way slower but along the same point of line of growth you still end up with just as toughened a dick. I mean, I’m not sure that super-light PE means better ratio of growth to toughening. I suspect it might just mean less growth including less toughening in direct proportion.

I realize there’s a point where too much is too much. But I don’t see any to believe that attaining a higher level of growth through greater intensity necessarily means a higher ratio of toughening to growth. If the ratio of toughening to growth is the same with PE routines with much greater intensity than this hypothetical 5-year jelq plan, then the former would be much better because it would mean you are having sex with a larger dick much sooner. Life’s short — that’s an important factor.

Moreover, it’s very well quite possible that toughening has just as much to do with how long you have been PEing even if that PEing is very light. That is, it’s possible the ratio of toughening to growth is actually greater if you’re taking a long time to get the growth but jelqing every day for years rather than getting the growth in 2 years or something.

I don’t know… it seems likely to me that the trauma induced by hardcore PE’ing would be more likely than light PE to cause toughening of the tunica, or making things more difficult in general. I think toughening is a defensive response from your body in the face of trauma, so if you’re not causing trauma, your body will not kick in a defensive response. Make sense?


Going for 6 inches of girth, wish me luck.

I’d go A too.

I would do which ever brought me the most size increase, the fastest. Discoloration is not an issue. Negative PI’s not an issue. Max size is what is important for me.

Call me ignorant but that’s my view and it never changes.


Obsession is a word used by the lazy to describe the dedicated.

My Pics

AOM's training log

Originally Posted by Ruz_
I don’t see the issue here.

What I mean by that is everyone has a differing penis, physiology, available time and objective. For some, the newbie routine over a few years could deliver them the results they want. However, for some they may have to hang to get the results they want.

Essentially I’m saying you should listen to your own unit. The best gains are achieved by feeling the results without pushing into injury.

I think you are asking an impossible question.


Ummm. I think it was a hypothetical question and not one based on reality/ facts.


Obsession is a word used by the lazy to describe the dedicated.

My Pics

AOM's training log

I’m currently going by the idea that the most possible without negative PIs is the best. That is, I’m thinking that the more you can grow as fast as possible without negative PIs the better. I’ve just decided to go with the idea that the dick is going to toughen in direct proportion to your growth no matter what rate you choose as long as no negative PIs. In fact, I think that going at a slower rate might possibly allow your dick to toughen before as much growth as would have occurred had you gone for faster without negative PIs.

In reality, time restricts my PE more than anything else, so I’m especially not worried that I’m doing too much. I’ve never experience negative PIs but I do spend a good 1.5 hour/day or so on jelqing, hanging, and clamping.

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
I'm your DICK fairy and I'm here to grant you any sized dick you want!!!Dino9X7Penis Enlargement66003-17-2017 12:51 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 PM.