Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Ideal penis size for women

Originally Posted by Para-Goomba
Man-of-10, funny that you mention that! When I am puzzled by 7+” girth guys who claim that their dick size is perfect for all women they’ve encountered (when I know that with a smaller girth, I’ve still had too much for some women), I’ve thought that one factor might be the proportion of the girth that is CS. Even if a guy has steely erections — and not everyone does — the CS and the glans will still be highly compressible, so the more of one’s dick volume that is in those parts, the easier it will be to fit into a tight pussy without problems :)


Yeah I’ve always had this belief. For some reason it has never really been discussed.

I think it definitely factors heavily, and yeah it’s probably why some of the guys with monster girths say that girls can take it with no problems, while others with lesser but still large/huge girths say that they’re partner finds it very difficult. Perhaps the former has a CS dominant girth, while the latter has a CC dominated girth.

I myself have almost no CS. Nevertheless, a big CS looks awesome, so when I start back that is what I will work on.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Another factor, man of 10, is how cylindrical a guy’s cock is. A very “flat” penis with a 6” circumference is much, much smaller (volumetrically) than a true cylinder of the same circumference.


Please :donatecar to Thunder's Place to keep it running.

Exactly. Then again, a very flat cock with more width is going to stretch a girl out width wise far more than a cylindrical one(it will stretch apart the two “internal arms” of the clitoris much more).

I know I have heard on here about members girlfriends complaining that it feels like their pussy is going to tear right at the bottom, presumably due to the guy having a cock with great depth. I’m not sure what to make of it however; does that mean depth is good or bad, relatively speaking?


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Man-of-10, I think depth is better than width (this is coming from a wide cocksmen).


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

Why do you think that?


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

I don’t think stretching the sides of the vagina causes more pleasure then just rubbing more area on the sides. Gently touching sends more satisfaction and sensation through people then pressing down on them. Thats why people twitch when you barely caress the top of their hands; as opposed to squeezing their hands.


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

Well isn’t that exactly the same for depth? Horizontal stretching will pull apart the internal “arms” of the clitoris more. That may provide pleasure, and even increase clitoris sensitivity.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Doesn’t the vagina have more depth then width?


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

Yeah I think it does. If it’s by a large margin, then it would be far easier to stretch width wise than depth wise. My guess would be that increasing width would result in a really good stretch increase(of the vagina). Depth would have to be increased far more to get comparable stretch. But who knows. I will fuck my girl when she is on her side and ask her if it feels better:) .


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Stumpy1,

Wouldn’t the preference for light touch vrs soft touch be relative. I mean some guys like a tighter or looser orifice (vagina, anus, depending on mood, type of sex) or use a tighter or lighter grip while masturbating. Women would be the same I would suppose, further making the “ideal size” impossible to pin down.

Originally Posted by man-of-10
Yeah I think it does. If it’s by a large margin, then it would be far easier to stretch width wise than depth wise. My guess would be that increasing width would result in a really good stretch increase(of the vagina). Depth would have to be increased far more to get comparable stretch. But who knows. I will fuck my girl when she is on her side and ask her if it feels better:) .

My point wasn’t just going on the stretch of the vagina.


2005: 5.5 EL & 5.6 EG, FL: 4in > Now: 7.5 NBP & 6.1 MEG, 5.8 BG (Goal: MORE !)

Stumpy1's Progress Thread

Everytime I Visit Thunders, I Do 50 Kegels or More

Originally Posted by man-of-10
Future1, does your unit have a big CS chamber(the soft one at the bottom)? If it does, then your usable girth will be a lot less that 6.6”.

I don’t think I have a particular big CS chamber no… There is quite a thick area at the bottom that feels softer when pressed on, but it’s not disproportionally large I think. My penis however is quite wide, but not quite flat.

But even still, I don’t think that the CS chamber is “unusable girth” as I think the bottom wall of a vagina is less strong than the CS chamber, meaning you will sooner open up her vagina more than have your CS compressed.

6.5 NBPEL X 6 MSEG *(length above average, i would say big 7.4 % populations, girth very big 1% populations ) for 80 % of woman .

But for my ego short goal is NBPEL 8.25” *(8” NBPEL is very rare , i think less than 1% http://www.mraverage.com/results.htm) *(now I’m between 7.75”-8” NBPEL - standing - *siting 8”-8.25” ) x 6.75” and I’m close !


Start - 20.10.2010 - SHORT GOAL - LONG GOAL - LONG ,LONG,LONG GOAL

BPEL - 8.25" - BPEL - 8.65" - BPEL - 9" - "SHANE DIESEL" or "JACK NAPIER"

MSEG - 6.35" - MSEG - 6.70" - MSEG - 7" -


Last edited by neven : 11-25-2010 at .

I think NBPEL 8” or more is around 0.7% of the world population

My current thinking is that 7.5” x 5.75” (BPEL) is truly ideal for fucking lots of women.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 PM.