The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.
This sounds like the “Penis size: the true average” discussion.
The average seems to get shorter and thinner every year. :-k
I still think the old 6x5 BP is probably about right, in terms of self measured stats. Maybe 5.75” x 4.75” in light of all the recent studies.
Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"
This sounds like the “Penis size: the true average” discussion.The average seems to get shorter and thinner every year. :-k
I still think the old 6x5 BP is probably about right, in terms of self measured stats. Maybe 5.75” x 4.75” in light of all the recent studies.
Not only do the measurements get smaller, certain condoms do as well. A friend who uses Skyn condoms reports the large fits a **dildo better than it used to 5 years ago.
Now: 9" BPEL x 6.25" MSEG as of 11/10/2019 This is my story, a few progress pics of me here, and all my methods.
Then: 6.25" x 4.37" in 8/2009 Are you new to PE? Here's some advice I wish someone had given me when I first started.
My Extender and forward to 10" and balls enhancement project. There is no "Holy Grail" of Penis Enlargement. Only time and effort works. I'm *10* years in and counting. All you have to do is put the work in and keep the faith.
Maybe the soy lattes are having an effect.
Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.
As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.
Going for the magic 8"x6"
Yup. Testosterone levels keep dropping, and we’re fast becoming a nation of pussies, girly men, and pussy-whipped milquetoasts.
“Well-endowed” starts at a half inch longer and thicker than you are. It always has, it always will.
“Well-endowed” starts at a half inch longer and thicker than you are. It always has, it always will.
True.
Began December 2009 at 5 7/8" length and 5" girth.
As of December 5th 2012 7 3/8" BPEL and 6 1/8" base girth.
Going for the magic 8"x6"
This sounds like the “Penis size: the true average” discussion.The average seems to get shorter and thinner every year. :-k
I still think the old 6x5 BP is probably about right, in terms of self measured stats. Maybe 5.75” x 4.75” in light of all the recent studies.
Studies are BS. Average is 8 NBPEL x 6.5 MSG.
Starts at around 7 BPEL by 5 MSEG.
Anything over 5.5 BPEL by 4.5 MSEG is decent
Anything less is starting to look a bit lacking.
My Opinion.
[QUOTE=kb87]
I just found ONE DEFINITE MISTAKE in the Veale compilation of studies. In http://onlineli brary.wiley.com … /bju.13010/full the Veale study has Wessels’s study in 1996 listed as 12.89 and has that recorded as BP length, when in fact in was actually a non bone pressed length.
Here is a source showing 12.89 as the NBP erect length and then further down it lists 6.3” as the functional length (BP measurement).Where is your Proof that is was non bone pressed?
The study by Wessels is behind a paywall. — The Veale study authors had a requirement for bone pressed (pubic fat pad pressed to the bone) — unless you have a definitive quote from Wessels that they did not depress the pubic fat pad — you are grasping at straws.
5"-5.25" is the AVERAGE BPL for ERECT penises, period
I looked up the original article by Wessels.
Here is the quote from Wessels:
"Measurements were made of the length from the pub-penile skin junction to the meatus"
"Functional penile length was the sum of erect length and fat pad depth."
Table 1 of the publication lists means of:
"Erect length (cm.) 12.89 ± 2.91"
"Fat pad depth (cm.) 2.85 ± 1.59"
"Functional length (cm.) 15.74 ± 2.62"
Functional length is not quite the same as BP since it is the sum of two measurements, but clearly Erect length is NBP.
So Veale did make a mistake.
It is not a large mistake, since the sample size in Wessels is small (80) compared to the full sample used by Veale (692).
If Veale used the functional length instead of the NBP length for Wessels, his average BPEL would have increased by 0.38 cm or o.15 inches.
“Well-endowed” starts at a half inch longer and thicker than you are. It always has, it always will.
QFTT!!!
Don’t worry about actual size. This is the mistake people make with weight in dieting. Personally all I focus on is fuctionality and the look compared to my overall body. I’m already big but because I’m such a big guy 6’5” I really don’t appear to be hung as big as I actually am.
Yea I know what you mean. I am 6’8 and 250lbs and have a 7.1 inch BPEL with a 5.9 inch Base Girth 5.5 mid shaft girth and my flaccid is probably only about 4 inches. But on my body and with my large hand, it looks pretty small. And if I’m turtling at the moment then my flaccid probably is under 3 inches easily. Needless to say this is my biggest drive for wanting gains through PE. I want my member to look big even on my large frame.
Yea I know what you mean. I am 6’8 and 250lbs and have a 7.1 inch BPEL with a 5.9 inch Base Girth 5.5 mid shaft girth and my flaccid is probably only about 4 inches. But on my body and with my large hand, it looks pretty small. And if I’m turtling at the moment then my flaccid probably is under 3 inches easily. Needless to say this is my biggest drive for wanting gains through PE. I want my member to look big even on my large frame.
You can pump for at least 30 minutes as part of your wakeup morning routine. This will yield you a fatter and longer flaccid to carry during the day. It “feels” better to, so imho it makes a man a little more on point…
You can pump for at least 30 minutes as part of your wakeup morning routine. This will yield you a fatter and longer flaccid to carry during the day. It “feels” better to, so imho it makes a man a little more on point…
Agree to a point. Eventually, you get diminishing returns. I’ve found that I carry that first pump around (after none) for a good day or two. But then I can’t repeat it on subsequent days.
I love how realistic and scientific the discussion has become :-) .
IMHO, Top 5% is considered well endowed in length and a decent girth.
For the calcsd western dataset, that works out to 6.9 inches BPEL.
And that makes a lot of sense for me.
Keep in mind, depending on your starting and/or current size, your opinions may differ.
I consider 7 inches NBPEL a great size.
[before PE] Start BPFSL: 17.6cm (6.93 inches) start BPEL: 16.7cm (6.57 inches)
[currently decon until aug 2024] latest BFPSL: 21.2cm (8.35 inches) latest BPEL: 19.5cm (7,68 inches) latest NBPEL: 17cm (6.69 inches)
Click here to see my amazing US progress report (always updated!Kyrpa's methodology) ;-)
For me well endowed would be 8.25 NBPEL and 6.5 girth. I will likely never achieve these numbers. If PE is real and actually works for me, maybe one day I might have that girth, since I’m already 6 inches. My NBPEL varies a lot. If I lost a ton of body fat, I wonder if I could lose .25/.50 off the pad and gain a bit of size there. Inside the pump my penis is about 7.75. I think with a better and stronger pump, it could possibly get bigger, and with added heat and doing it for a long time maybe.
But as of now, I don’t think being well endowed enough to the point where I would no longer be threatened by another man, or wonder if I had a bigger dick, would my girl enjoy it better, is possible. I could have 8.25 but there could be a guy out there with 10 or 11. I’d wonder would my girl be more turned on, enjoy sex with me more once she’s warmed up? Who knows.
I’ve not measured 7 inches NBPEL yet. My BPEL is 7.5, which to be completely fair is larger than I’d ever previously measured, so the pump certainly awoke something, also, Cialis helps. I’m gonna give it to the big C and amazing bloodflow as to why I’ve measured larger. Still, my dick looks small to me. Even in pictures I took with the pump, where I’m 1/4 inch away from 8 inches, it still doesn’t look impressive to me.