Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Height vs. Length vs. Girth Project

Height: 67”

Pre PE BPEL: 6.9”

Pre PE EG: 5.75”


Grow yourself a whopper, then tell her to fuck off.

Something’s a little odd here. From cursory examination of the data, it seems like the average height is like 6’ tall. And the average length and girth are also pretty high.


Mr.black

Current 7.85" BPEL (7.25" NPBEL) x 5.75" MSEG| 6.25" BEG | 5" Flaccid Length

Goal 8" NBPEL x 6.25" MSEG

Height: 70”
Length: 6.8”
Girth: 5.5”

have yet to start PE.

Originally Posted by mr. black
Something’s a little odd here. From cursory examination of the data, it seems like the average height is like 6’ tall.

Men usually think they’re an inch or two taller than they actually are.

Height: 69.75”

Length: 7”

Girth: 5”


7/6/2009 BPEL 7 EG 5, 8/6/2009 BPEL 7.25 EG 5.188, 9/17/09 BPEL 7.25 EG 5.25, 10/16/09 BPFL 4.938 FG 4.5 BPSFL 7.5, 1/1/2010 BPEL7.25, EG 5.25, 3/22/2011 BPFSL 7.625 BPEL 7.38, EG 5.25, 7/16/2011 BPEL 7.5 EG 5.375, Goal BPEL 7.5 EG 6

Height:70

Length:6.7 (guesstimate using today’s BP/NBP ratio on pre-PE NBPEL)

Girth:4.53


22.01.08 NBPEL: 5.91/15cm, BEG: 4.29/10.9cm, MEG: 4.53/11.5cm

03.09.09 NBPEL: 6.26/15.9cm, BPEL: 7.09/18cm, BEG: 4.49/11.4cm, MEG: 4.92/12.5cm

Originally Posted by mr.black
Something’s a little odd here. From cursory examination of the data, it seems like the average height is like 6’ tall. And the average length and girth are also pretty high.

I think this is a very valuable survey, but just purely speaking of how it is being run, I think it is somewhat flawed. Where as the old pre-PE girth and length surveys (See my sig) were anonymous, this one is not. I think that it makes it more likely than not that the larger guys reply than the smaller guys. We’ll see in the end if the averages match up to the old surveys. I have a feeling they will be higher for this reason.

Still though - very valuable work!


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

Esc, yes, it’s a cool survey. One other possible problem, though, is that the “third variable” of the degree to which a guy is prone to exaggerate can produce spurious correlations between length, girth, and height. Suppose, for example, that two guys participated in the survey, who in reality are both 5’10”, 6” long, and 5” girth. If one of them is a bit self-deluded or prone to exaggeration or “generous” in his measuring technique, he may report himself as 6’0”, 6.5” long, and 5.25” girth, while the other guy reports his stats accurately. Suddenly, you have a positive correlation between all three measurements, according to the survey, yet no correlation in reality. Now, I’m not proposing that this is a huge problem that would massively distort the data, simply that it is, undoubtedly, one factor that will influence the results. The same thing would happen, of course, with a self-reported survey of IQ and max bench press :)

@Para-Goomba,

Esc is reducing the variables to simplify the equations… The more variables, the tougher to analyze the situation. If the height vs. length vs. girth relation exists… for an accurate analysis we should consider the probabilities of guys joining TP… The tallest with big dicks perhaps won’t join… or yes because the dick-body ratio make them feel small… who knows. On the other hand, the short guys with big dicks for sure won’t join TP… Perhaps, the average and short guys with average dicks perhaps will join TP to compensate their self-esteem (like myself). Perhaps the small penis guys won’t put their measurements here because they feel inferior or something like that.

The point of what I’m trying to say is that taking into account more variables is not a really good idea… We can estimate an error to the measurements to make it more “real”, but analyzing more things is madness.

Anyway, for me the height vs. length vs. girth relation is real.

Bigger

8inchM!

^^^ Agreed that there are too many variables. It could have been improved by making it anonymous although this is difficult given VBulletin’s poll limitations - there are three variables here, not one, and people would invariably mess up on a multiple-checkbox poll.

As far as the guys on Thunders…well I’d contend that it is pretty close to the real world distribution. Comparisons to outside sources have shown this to be true. I think the one difference would be that there are fewer truly big ones here (8x6 and up) than in the real world. Not too many fewer, but fewer for sure.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

I will help out but only in the name of science=) This is pre pe since I haven’t officially started.

Height: 75”
BPEL:7.375
MSEG:5.3125
Weight:220lbs

Height: 78”
BPEL: 6.8”
MSEG: 5.9”

I wouldn’t be surprised if Thunder’s guys skewed taller, because of the dick/height comparison. Apparently male porn stars are all pretty short.

I’ll probably throw off your stats.

Height: 63”
Pre BPEL: 6.75”
Pre EG: 5.5”

My wife calls me tripod :D


"Don't be like Jackie. There is only one Jackie. Go to school and study computers instead." Jackie Chan

Height: 66.5”

Pre PE BPEL: 7.0”

Pre PE MSEG: 5.8

Yea it seems the majority of the guys posting on this thread that are over 6ft tall have above 5 inch girth. I think that the girth stat will be well above average from Kinsey, lifestyles, etc. This also skews my perception a bit, now i’m thinking that taller guys on average are about the same length as shorter guys but the taller guys have more girth. No wonder my oldest sons mother likes tall guys (I think she’s a size queen).

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM.