erectionphotos.com disses PE! WTF?
A reply to a previous post of mine directed me to a site called http://erectiophotos.com I checked it out and mainly lost interest after about 5 seconds, but I did check out the Q&A section.
Now, although I’m not really certain of the real reason for this site’s existence, it does seem to be damned nicely put together by some folks who really care what they’re doing.
My point. If this were some chicken-shack operation, I might expect a little ignorance on the part of the operatives. But considering that it appears to be run by folks who have a clue, I was really shocked at questions #8 and #9.
“There is no hard (pun) evidence that any of the non-surgical methods work — even though you can find all sorts of testimonials that they do. People will swear to almost anything! If these methods really did work, they would be written up in all the most important magazines and scientific journals. This news would be shouted from the housetops. Instead these “offers” are from people who are ready to make money on the fact that quite a few men wish they had more of a good thing. There is some temporary stretching of the flaccid penis that can occur, but you probably add a little length at the loss of thickness — which is a bad trade in my book. The stretching, IF it occurs, will affect your flaccid penis and not your erection, so it’s no big gain.”
And this from the mouths of folks who have a dick site! Do they ever come over here to Thunder’s? We have enough “hard” evidence to lock up all those lying fools!
8/1/02: 5.75" BPEL X 4.5" EG
6/1/03: 7.5" BPEL X 5.75" EG as measured midshaft with a snapped chalk line....