Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Dick's changing shape: from oval to round

123

Dick's changing shape: from oval to round

I started clamping recently.

Good progress so far, manly base circumference shot up.

Main reason: shape’s changing from oval to round.

Reason for that: corpus spongiosum reacting faster than cavernosa.

Why that? - Much weaker tunica; and the logic of geometric stress response.


Later - ttt

For what is is worth the bit of girth I gained is because of corpus spongiosum development.

But my penis was always oval, wider top to bottom than across. So now it is even more oval!

I vaguely remember reading somewhere on Thunder’s that this is typical of girth gains.

Originally Posted by ticktickticker
I started clamping recently.

Good progress so far, manly base circumference shot up.

Main reason: shape’s changing from oval to round.

Reason for that: corpus spongiosum reacting faster than cavernosa.

Why that? - Much weaker tunica; and the logic of geometric stress response.

TTT,

I am a classic tree trunk shape. I originally start at 5.75 at the base and 4.5 at the circ scar. Now I am about 6.5 at the base (or more) and 5.25 at the scar. It is a dramatic change at the circ scar, but I noticed the roundness as well. I used to be about the same width, but the new thickness adds the greater girth. I agree with your assumption about the CS.

I was going to start a thread like this, but better to bump this one.

What have the other girth gainers noticed, in terms of CC growth compared to CS growth?

Also, hangers who gained base girth: was it CS exclusively?

I’ve noticed that porn actors have peculiarly overdeveloped corpus spongiosums. I wonder if that is a tell-tale sign of PE.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

My CS sucks. All my girth gains have been from CC expansion. If you took my CS away I would be close to 5.5” girth for sure.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Originally Posted by Esc
I’ve noticed that porn actors have peculiarly overdeveloped corpus spongiosums. I wonder if that is a tell-tale sign of PE.

Regarding porn actors, I have a comment:

I noticed many Thunder’s people mentioning Shane Diesel as a girth king. I never found his girth that visually shocking, in contrast to ironaddict (here), for example. Recently, I realized why: I have a very large CC and very small CS. For this reason, I get shocked by large CS girths, and for the same reason, large CS people find Shane Diesel’s CC girth extraordinary.

Functionally speaking, as a pose to visually, CC girth will give a much greater stretch on a girls pussy than a CS will. Then again, a big CS is great aesthetically.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Originally Posted by man-of-10
Functionally speaking, as a pose to visually, CC girth will give a much greater stretch on a girls pussy than a CS will. Then again, a big CS is great aesthetically.

The vaginal canal expands to a larger vertical than horizontal width?

If that is true, that is still not saying much. If CC girth will stretch more, CS girth will fill more.

I was referring to the fact that the CS lacks rigidity when compared to the CC chambers. The CS can be seen as “low-EQ girth” while the CC chambers can be seen as “high-EQ girth” (providing one has good overall erection quality).

In a tight pussy, a big CS will be compressed, and this give will prevent excessive stretch (maybe a good thing?). Two big CC chambers however, will not undergo such compression when under the constriction of a tight pussy, due to their rigidity.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Good point, man-of-10.

I hope other girth gainers can give their inputs. This can be very useful.

Originally Posted by LongVehicle
The vaginal canal expands to a larger vertical than horizontal width?

If that is true, that is still not saying much. If CC girth will stretch more, CS girth will fill more.


That is true for the women I’ve been width. My wife expands very little during sex horizontal. 2 fingers no problem, 3 fingers is getting tight and that is the same every time. Vertical goes from 2 fingers at start of sex to 4 (even taking the knuckles in) when she is excited. I guess a CC girth will give a more intense feeling for her and that is what I hope to achieve.


Historical graph since start including all Measures and Goals -

Start 2008-09-01: 5,9" X 4,5", 2012-03-31: 7,3" X 5.4" - Goal 7,5" X 5,5"

Has anyone actually managed to expand their CC significantly? For me girth gains have primarily come from the CS. If you have, what exercises targeted the CC and have shown you clear width expansion?


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

Originally Posted by Esc
Has anyone actually managed to expand their CC significantly? For me girth gains have primarily come from the CS. If you have, what exercises targeted the CC and have shown you clear width expansion?

The majority of my girth growth was CC-based. My CS only grew visibly at the base and tip (why the tip, I have no idea).

Top
123
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Baseball shape, tree trunk shape, I have a damn hourglass shape. How did this happen?ObafemiPenis Enlargement Basics008-16-2007 07:26 AM
changing shapejspacePenis Pumps205-11-2004 03:17 PM
changing shapemook26Penis Enlargement103-24-2004 02:38 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 PM.