Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Cut v.s Uncut, Which one looks bigger?

12

Cut v.s Uncut, Which one looks bigger?

For all of you, penis size gurus. Considering that you have two penises, with exactly the same dimensions, but one of them is cut and the other uncut, which one seems bigger?

Is that exactly the same dimensions pre-op or post-op? I mean the foreskin would add some girth just below the glans, but then if you mean the girth in that same position on both penises is the same with or without the extra skin, then the cut one might look bigger. I think it also depends on individuals’ perceptions, i.e. when looking at an intact penis do you imagine its size when the foreskin is retracted before comparing it to a cut penis, and so on.


Start: 22 Mar 04: 6.5" BPEL x 4.6" EG & 6" head. As at: 1 Jan 05: 7.5" BPEL x 4.8-4.9" EG & 6.3" head.

Re-re-start!: 6 Feb 17: 6.9" BPEL x 4.9" EG & 5.5" head. As of: 23 Feb 17: 7.0" BPEL x 5.0" EG & 6.0" head.

Ideal: ASAP: 8+" BPEL x 5.5+" EG & 6.5+" head But will continue if the going is good!!

Uncut - it has more skin.


Stats (bp) 2004/08/19 8.0 X 5.5" 2005/08/29 8.2 X 5.8" Goal - I am good for now

Ok, what I’m talking is about “perception”, that’s the word. Let’s say there are 2 guys with exactly the same penis size. (i.e. they are both 7” x 6”). They both have an erection at the same time, the only difference would be one of them is cut. Which penis looks bigger?

I think they would look the same except one would be wearing a turtle neck sweater.


Feb 2004 BPEL 6.7" NBPEL ???? BPFSL ???? EG 5.65" Feb 2005 BPEL 7.1" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 6.9" EG 5.8" Feb 2006 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.6" EG 5.85" Feb 2007 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.5" EG 5.9"

From what I can tell looking at porn, when erect, you can’t tell who is cut and who is uncut. So from a size stand point, they look the same.

Originally Posted by mbuc
I think they would look the same except one would be wearing a turtle neck sweater.

Yeah, probably.


Start: 22 Mar 04: 6.5" BPEL x 4.6" EG & 6" head. As at: 1 Jan 05: 7.5" BPEL x 4.8-4.9" EG & 6.3" head.

Re-re-start!: 6 Feb 17: 6.9" BPEL x 4.9" EG & 5.5" head. As of: 23 Feb 17: 7.0" BPEL x 5.0" EG & 6.0" head.

Ideal: ASAP: 8+" BPEL x 5.5+" EG & 6.5+" head But will continue if the going is good!!

Originally Posted by gprent101
From what I can tell looking at porn, when erect, you can’t tell who is cut and who is uncut. So from a size stand point, they look the same.

Yeah, when erect they are pretty much the same thing. When flacid, the uncut one may appear a little girthier because of the extra skin.

Ok, your answers are considering both penises retract their foreskin, but some guys don’t do that, I mean they have an erection with the foresking covering their glans. That’s what I mean. Do you understand me now guys? =)

I know its a common opinion, that I sometimes share, that circumcised penises look bigger. So I’d say, given the situation you’ve suggested, navarro, that if I couldn’t see them both side by side to compare but had to just go by my perception, I would say the cut one. Only because the uncut one would look like its nestled away under the foreskin, and I think that’s probably why one of the reasons given by some people for circumcision is that it makes it look bigger.


Start: 22 Mar 04: 6.5" BPEL x 4.6" EG & 6" head. As at: 1 Jan 05: 7.5" BPEL x 4.8-4.9" EG & 6.3" head.

Re-re-start!: 6 Feb 17: 6.9" BPEL x 4.9" EG & 5.5" head. As of: 23 Feb 17: 7.0" BPEL x 5.0" EG & 6.0" head.

Ideal: ASAP: 8+" BPEL x 5.5+" EG & 6.5+" head But will continue if the going is good!!

I am uncut, full on hard it looks the same as cut but with some pics I have seen some guys still have skin covering

I think there is no question exposed head looks way bigger and scarier

Can the skin be pulled back or the person just doesn’t op to?

In most cases, when erect there will be no significant difference in perception of size. But in a flaccid state, the uncut knob looks much longer. At least this is my perception—and I’m cut! First, the uncut skin usually extends 1/4” or so below the tip of the head. Second, the appearance of the head makes the shaft look shorter. With the skin covering the head, the shaft looks that much longer. But I could see that if one has a big head, having this exposed when flaccid may look scary, as someone suggests above.

Uncut gives the illusion of being bigger in my opinion.


You don't have to be great to start, but you have to start to be great.

Zig Ziglar

It’s simple.. when you cut something off from an object (e.g. your penis) the result is indeed smaller. ;)

Top
12
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Precum and being cut.........twatteaserMen's Sexual Health3208-27-2006 09:24 PM
Circumsized vs. Uncut HanginghobbyPenis Hangers912-24-2004 02:46 AM
Dr Lin, Cut vs Uncut and first masterbationtripsPenis Enlargement4211-12-2004 05:45 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 PM.