Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Average Penis Size, Revisited

Originally Posted by sparky91
Sure there are Asians with monster willies out there but they are definitely outnumbered by whites who in turn are outnumbered by blacks.

I am yet to see an Asian guy with an 8 incher NBP.

I’m curious to see what the average size for Asians are here. All I know is of Siam guy who is like 6.3 or something.

And I agree that on average, Asians have smaller penis. But 3.7 for an average seems a bit too small….

Originally Posted by ThunderSS
And this is supported by what survey again spark?

For example http://www.sizesurvey.com/result.html (BP results)

Blacks sport slightly shorter average than whites but the standard deviation for blacks is much larger than that for whites or Asians, suggesting the presence of true monsters in the knickers.


Stats (bp) 2004/08/19 8.0 X 5.5" 2005/08/29 8.2 X 5.8" Goal - I am good for now

From your link.

“Since the release of the fifth edition, the number of Black and Hispanic participants has not substantially increased. Because of the continued low sample sizes therefore, the results reported below concerning the aforementioned groups must be considered tentative, pending a larger number of responses.”


Penis Enlargement Forum -- How To Jelq -- Free Penis Enlargement Videos

Make a Donation This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

Ok, ok, let’s forget the black sample. I guess I was overly influenced by the urban myth :)

Although I have a gut feeling that blacks are bigger than anybody else (not trying to annoy anybody, just my personal opinion).


Stats (bp) 2004/08/19 8.0 X 5.5" 2005/08/29 8.2 X 5.8" Goal - I am good for now

So the average is 6.4 in length and 5.0 in girth.

Crude. I’m a tad bit below in all respects. Hopefully I can reach my goal with PE. If I seriously gain an inch in length and 0.5 in girth I will freaking donate to this forum.

Caucasians were surprisingly higher than blacks, but that could be due to the limited sampling size.

I think those are off, the length is way high and the girth is a tad high.

Everything I have seen never said more than 6.25, it was usually 5.9

And every girth I have seen in 4.75, wasn’t the Kinsley report the widest point.


Did you know America ranks the lowest in education but the highest in drug use? It's nice to be number one, but we can fix that. All we need to do is start the war on education. If it's anywhere near as successful as our war on drugs, in no time we'll all be hooked on phonics

- Leighann Lord

Hold your horses, fellows. I just posted this link to show the difference in averages across races. I never meant it to be a benchmark for the true and absolute average. If you ask me, those are high averages for length. For example when men take 5 measurements and report the best.


Stats (bp) 2004/08/19 8.0 X 5.5" 2005/08/29 8.2 X 5.8" Goal - I am good for now


Last edited by sparky91 : 10-08-2005 at .

Oops I was wrong, midshaft average is 4.85 according to the kinsey report.


Did you know America ranks the lowest in education but the highest in drug use? It's nice to be number one, but we can fix that. All we need to do is start the war on education. If it's anywhere near as successful as our war on drugs, in no time we'll all be hooked on phonics

- Leighann Lord

when comes to survey size, they refer to erected penis or flaccid penis?

Am I to understand that the French are the biggest pricks in the world?

Originally Posted by sparky91
For example http://www.sizesurvey.com/result.html (BP results)

Blacks sport slightly shorter average than whites but the standard deviation for blacks is much larger than that for whites or Asians, suggesting the presence of true monsters in the knickers.

The owner of that site discarded the top 2% in sizes, figuring that it would help keep the results realistic. On the other hand it could be that he also threw out some legitimate sizes that would have strongly affected a small sampling.


Last edited by beenthere : 11-10-2005 at .

Looking at his numbers, he shows a total of 2545 respondents (all ages and races combined) after the 2% top chopping and the 1% bottom chopping, and he mentions also subtracting some obviously bogus claims in addition to the those percentage cuts. He also says there were over 3100 respondents total, before chopping.

To just chop 2% off the total top overall, and then apply the leftover into racial distribution, could have a very strong effect on a racial group’s average if that group is small. Also, that cut could shrink substantially the sampling size of a small sampling group (if that group had many numbers in the top 2%) Is this why the results are the way they are, and the sampling size is small?

If that is what he did, better would have been to separate each racial group and only then proceed to take off the percentages.

What I just pointed out explains some things in my mind about the results, but without absolutely knowing precisely what he did, what the sizes were, how many of each race were in that cut group, and how many were legit, I can’t really know for sure what to make of it. Too many ifs, ands, and buts.

Originally Posted by sparky91
Hey folks,

I happened to stumble across a bunch of average penis statistics. Looks very interesting/encouraging :leftie:
Although adding to the raging average penis size controversy

http://www.altpenis.com/penis_news/global_penis_size_survey.shtml

Those poor guys in India - ave 4.0 !! And the big dudes in France - c’est magnifique !

One of the most scientific, objective studies was performed on some 440 college dudes by Lifestyle condom co., I think it was done during “spring break” in Cancu. The results were every close to the data shown at altpenis.com.

If you peruse lpsg.org, you get the impression that the average size is around 8.5 !

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:05 AM.