Originally Posted by Don Logan
Agreed. If you’ve ever had surgery of any type, you realize how foreign it is to cut open skin and re-arrange, remove, or add to anything inside, then zip you back up. It’s a reality of modern life and it saves lives. My Dad just got his heart done. But it also makes you hope for the day when cutting open humans will be seen as barbaric, akin to our view today of bloodletting or trepanning. Such elective surgery as penis enlargement, short of the couple mentioned above, is madness.
You’d be mostly right (you described invasive methods like de-gloving) in ascribing the dangers of elective medical penis enlargement, but times have changed — common knowledge on the matter has not.
The reality is that a significant sample size over nearly a decade have demonstrated the legitimacy & efficacy of girth enhancement (via non-surgical dermal filler injections via skilled & experienced practitioners). Some more “invasive” techniques also remain viable, although I could see reasons to opt for non-surgical options instead. Lengthening still remains hit-or-miss.
This all said, there still remains a few “players” in the industry that ensure sentiments expressed by yourself and others (e.g. “madness”) will continue to persist, despite any credible advancements in the field. Those “players” tend to be physicians that may-or-may-not be cited in this thread, but I’ll let the facts speak for themselves.
As far as “madness” in pursuing penis enlargement is concerned, I would (maybe) agree if the individual was already well-endowed. However, I suspect many lurkers are too embarrassed or disinterested in sharing their starting stats, the same type of men who aren’t “mad” for considering all viable options. If women have standardized elective options, why can’t men? And as men, we do have those choices now. I can say that in light of a decade’s worth of skepticism & cynicism. There’s a decade worth of content and first-hand photo evidence to review if you’d like to challenge that assertion.
Male cosmetic enhancement is real and is going to trend in the new decade. I’d know, I went from snugger-fit condoms to Magnum XL’s over the past decade with zero instances of complications, and I know many hundreds of others who’ve made their case via progress reports with the highest degree of scrutiny & moderation. What we also know is that some techniques historically cited as reasons to avoid phalloplasty are becoming increasingly obsolete, much like some of the methods employed by “certain doctors” found in this thread. That in it of itself is a sign that the PE market is evolving.
Are there risks associated with penis enlargement procedures? Of course, but they’ve come a long way from complications-of-old. We now live in a time where reasonable elective alternatives exist if attaining girth via manual PE exercises fail (e.g. pumping, jelqing, hanging, etc). I wouldn’t recommend this to men of above-average or average endowment, and I only chimed in because I think the term “madness” downplays the justifiable motivations of smaller men.
Good luck and always do your research. Be mindful of the scams associated with this industry and demand irrefutable evidence (example: credible before & after photos, etc) when making serious commitments to penis enlargement.
Cheers everyone, and may Santa bless us all with a fatter dick this coming year & decade!