Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Why are girth gains...

12

I fell in love with clamping. The sheer size of my dick while clamped was sometimes laughably huge….and I felt that along with girth gains (which while clamped were as much as 6 1/4”) I should also see some length gains.

While reading more here I got to the point where I felt that I was going to stop my length gains, which was actually happening at the time.

Since I stopped the clamping some three weeks ago I have got into a good mechanical stretching routine and I`m going to wait until july 1st to measure erect again and see if, for Me, the hypothesis is valid…that clamping detracts from length gains.

Originally Posted by cervixhunter

Could you elaborate on this? I don’t see how the glans can limit the expansion lengthwise, only if one presses his glans against the wall. Otherwise, if the glans is free to move together with the tunica, how is it limiting the internal pressure and expansion?

All he means is anatomically the glans are composed of different tissue fibers that limit expansion more then the tunica along the shaft. So being that the glans are harder to elongate lengthwise as well as by its diameter, wouldn’t make sense that it is acting like a rubber wedge caught in a door preventing it from opening freely.


Starting stats: Feb 08: [7.3 BPEL * 4.9? EG]----Now: [8.00 BPEL * 5.1-5.2 EG]------GOAL: [8 NBPEL * 6 EG]

Perception is reality.

The part that confused me was:

“… the glans is limiting the force that is enlarging the penis lengthwise, so the force is acting more proficiently girth-wise …”

I understand the glans can absorb pressure increases, but the effect is the same length- and girth-wise. Pressure is a scalar field, it’s the same in any direction.

I still miss an explanation why the tunica is easier to enlarge lengthwise than girth-wise. I’m not even sure this claim is supported by evidences.


Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

There is the practical aspect of lengthening the tunica by stretching. It is efficient, because it acts directly in the desired direction by direct force. We don’t have a similar way to stretch girth-wise, as we don’t have lateral grip. This makes lengthening easier, but not because longitudinal fibers are intrinsically easier to elongate.


Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

Originally Posted by cervixhunter

We don’t have a similar way to stretch girth-wise, as we don’t have lateral grip.

That would probably require a vacuum. Something you’d find in a pump. :)


I'm a big fan of 50 Cent, or as we call him in Zimbabwe, four hundred million dollars.

^ This makes me think about the unexplored virtues of an octopus used for lateral stretching :)


Starting BPEL: 6.9" (Dec.1st, 2008)

Current BPEL: 8.11" NBPEL: 7.63" BPFSL: 9.09"

Current MEG : 5.6"

Girth gains were easy for me; length was the real bitch. Different guys’ penises are built differently.


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

To the point, and to back ModestoMan up, girth gains are a lot easier for me too. I’ve seen some great girth gains, but no length gains at all.

Top
12

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28 AM.