Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

What is really the average circumference

I want more girth!

RAWR!

As of 11/27/2006 ~12:15am, of all users with at least two entries in the PE database (1083 users to be exact):

Average starting girth: 5.00”
Average ending girth: 5.32”

I know this is a post about girth, but here is the length also:

Average starting length (BPEL): 6.35”
Average ending length (BPEL): 7.03”


Oct 2006: BPEL: 7.75" NBPEL: 7.00" EG: 5.125"

Goal: 17+ cubic inches of volume, someday, currently inactive

Edit


Last edited by deukalion : 12-06-2006 at .

To be able to answer this question the best way possible I have spent lots of lots of time watching documented sex films (porn).

I have found out that:

1. The average penis length is 8-10 inches
2. The average girth is 6-8 inches.
3. The average woman swallows and loves to take big dicks in the ass.

:thumbs:

This is very credible data used by the World Health organization in the fight for AIDS. The title of the paper is Penis size by ethnicity. I’m not too sure if this is my first post of not. I’ve been reading these forums for a good year. Tabs don’t work so this table will come out badly formatted. The mesures are made on 3 groups; White USA, Black USA, Asian.

LENGTH White USA Black USA Asian
<10 cm (3.93 in) 0% 0% 3%
10-12.5 cm (3.93-4.92 in) 3% 0% 27%
12.6-15 cm (4.96-5.91 in) 27% 15% 51%
15.1-17.5 cm (5.94-6.89 in) 53% 59% 17%
17.6-20 cm (6.93-7.87 in) 15% 21% 2%
>20 cm (7.87 in) 2% 5% 0%
CIRCUMFERENCE
<7.5 cm (2.95 in) 2% 2% 0%
7.6-10 cm (2.99-3.94 in) 3% 2% 16%
10.1-11.2 cm (3.98-4.41 in) 13% 9% 37%
11.3-12.7 cm (4.45-5 in) 53% 53% 30%
12.8-13.7 cm (5.04-5.39 in) 10% 11% 14%
13.8-15 cm (5.43-5.91 in) 14% 14% 3%
>15 cm (5.91 in) 5% 9% 0%

Source: “The Male Latex Condom: Appendix III: Regional or Ethnic Differences in Erect Penis Size,” World Health Organization/UN AIDS, 1998. Data on USA subjects drawn from interviews conducted 1938-1963 by the Institute for Sex Research, tabulated 1979; circumference measured at maximum point. Data on Asian subjects conducted at Bangkok Medical University, 1979; circumference measured at base.

Quote
Data on USA subjects drawn from interviews

:-k

Yeah but it also says circumference measured.. Why measure circumference if you are just gonna _ask_ about length? Interviews were “intimate”.

Attached is a picture of a plot of the data.

Attached Images
chart.JPG
(78.7 KB, 215 views)

BP or NBP?

nice chart a_ht.

But I’m going to have to go with Joe_joe, BP or NBP?


Oct 2006: BPEL: 7.75" NBPEL: 7.00" EG: 5.125"

Goal: 17+ cubic inches of volume, someday, currently inactive

Nice chart. BP or NBP, but I don’t think he’d know. At least girth is smaller on average than I thought. Still, I’d like more.

Originally Posted by a_ht
Yeah but it also says circumference measured.. Why measure circumference if you are just gonna _ask_ about length? Interviews were “intimate”.

The data you’re referring to (“interviews conducted 1938-1963 by the Institute for Sex Research, tabulated 1979”) are the infamous Kinsey data. They are self-report, not physician measurements; the participants were instructed to measure their girth in a certain way. The full citation from the Kinsey page:

Gebhard, Paul, and Johnson, Alan. (1979/1998). The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research (reprint edition). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

You can tell the data are self-report if you look at the girth table. A substantial number of men (1+%) with a 2” girth or less?? No. Some guys got confused and reported diameter rather than circumference. Notice that the (presumably) physician-measured Asian data show no girths under 3”.

As documented in this thread, men seem to exaggerate their sizes in self-reports. If anything, the Kinsey data may overestimate the actual girth distribution. As others have said in this thread, though, there really aren’t many good objective data available on girth compared to length, so who really knows. Most agree the average is somewhere between 4.5 and 5”.

Originally Posted by a_ht
Circumference measured at maximum point.

Data on Asian subjects conducted at Bangkok Medical University, 1979; circumference measured at base.

!

Makes the difference even bigger


Later - ttt

Or not? Maximum is at the base most of the time.

However, I measure ad midpoint; if I’d check my base girth I’d probably make a major jump in the girth department without even putting a clamp on :)


Later - ttt

Good source a_ht. I believe there is something changed after the birth of Thunder’s forum :) Asian people start to be more interested in enlarging their boys. So sooner or later the chart will be reappeared with a huge change. Here is an example:

LENGTH White USA Black USA Asian

17.6-20 cm (6.93-7.87 in) 15% 21% 40%

CIRCUMFERENCE
13.8-15 cm (5.43-5.91 in) 14% 14% 50%

LOLZZZ

Regards,

D’


7 x 6 EG is perfect!

Routine : Manual-V-Inverted V-JAI-BTC stretches (alot of stretches :D ). Wet Jelq, Pumping (once a week to maintain my girth)

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:00 PM.