Unit shape, gain potential relevance.

Hey folks, how’re we all enjoying this PE game? good? good.
Okay, i guess my question-slash-observance is this:

I’ve read ALL the theories to death, and from what i’ve concluded, nothing means shit. Because, at the end of the day, some dude seems to come along and throw ‘em all out the window. Nevertheless, there is a certain “trend”, or a few truths i’ve noticed on LOT, TGC, all that.
Folks with units that point straight up, and that curve straight up (healthy curve),
seem to have a hard time gaining. I’m really sorry guys, no stats on this one, no scientific data. But if anyone can agree with me, or have observed the same deal, then say so, for sure!

It seems with these folks, of which i am one, there seems to be a lot of solid tunica - what i assume i can call the hard shaft, with the erection quality of a god(haha). So that’s perhaps what is creating the hardship.

Another thing i’ve noticed, is that I have made the most of my small gains through some minor tunica focused work, so that also backs up my thinking.
Also, all the folks that point down, seem to gain the most! Whats goin’ on? What’s happening brother?

Watcha think guys?

In years here and hundreds of thousands of posts read, I could not make the assumption you have made there. Very few guys, when talking about their gains, mention their erection angles or the shape of curve of their dicks. The threads on curvature are usually on straightening, not gains. LOT angle has not been considered of great importance to gains for a very long time.

Very often the ‘units that point straight up’ are not just because of short ligs; the last few degrees of angle come from erection strength. It used to be considered that older guys had an easier time gaining, but that has also been proven not to be true by analysing the statistics.

I find it strange that you consider that ALL the theories ‘mean shit’, and then propose one of your own, far less thoroughly researched than the ones you are disrespecting.

If I had to throw in two cents I would say that a healthy pre-gain penis would be the “straight up” super boner, but as you expand the tunica and ligs and make gains you will develop more of a “hang” in your dickus. Maybe because stuff is a bit looser in there, maybe because its mass is bigger and gravity pulls it down…whatever.

Either way, I don’t think there is any correlation between “straight up” wang’s and not being able to make gains.

Aaah, jeebus. I knew i shouldn’t have posted this. I’ll know for next time..
Look, FIREGOAT, i think you’re a champ, i like what you write, (seriously!) so i’m sorry if i offended ya!

I guess this was just a discussion on my part. Just asserting some things, so take it easy guys.. this is all just what I’m thinking, and wanted to know what you guys thought.
And come on, i didn’t say i had a new theory?
You don’t agree, alright, it’s all good, you know man? Haha damn though, glad for your input guys.

I’ll share my 2 cents here as well. I have a modest upward curve, the type that is considered “healthy”. It does not bother me, and I kind of like it so it is not my intent to straighten it out through PE. I started PE in 2002, and gained a little over an inch in length, and a little over a half inch girth in the first year. I was very happy with that, and it kind of caused me to stray from PE for a few years, while resting on my laurels, thinking I went from the lower part of average to mid-average. Big mistake, I should have kept going! I am back at it now, and I am hoping for some of the “newbie” gains all over again. With almost 4 years of no PE, I lost .1” length, and about half the girth I had previously gained. I attribute some of that loss to having started smoking again too…

So is there truth to that theory? Who knows in general, but for me, no. I think I gained very well in the first year of PE. I can actually see where my dick grew. I have great stretch marks to prove it.

Hey clamz, assert this.