Ok I have been doing a little research here, and I have a question.
There seems to be two schools of thought on how much training is necessary or acceptable for growth. One school seems to subscribe to ‘less is more’ and consequently more growth will occur with a routine that is more brief and/or less strenuous. The other school of thought (primarily hangers led by Bib? I assume) believe that continuing to train, even after fatigued, is the way to grow.
While I am sure the continuing to train, even after fatigued, regimen is far more advanced than my Newbie status will allow, I am curious as to which is the better approach, out of curiosity?
Thanks to anyone who has a contribution. :)